Fighting and Victory as Basic Terms in Agonistics and Praxeology and the Art of War

Safety & Defense Pub Date : 2021-07-13 DOI:10.37105/SD.121
J. Wołejszo, Konrad Malasiewicz
{"title":"Fighting and Victory as Basic Terms in Agonistics and Praxeology and the Art of War","authors":"J. Wołejszo, Konrad Malasiewicz","doi":"10.37105/SD.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Questions of how to overcome problems are probably the basic questions of fighters. Answers to them, from a historical perspective, the principles of martial art have been provided. These provisions, often mutually exclusive, raise questions related to the scientific approach to this issue. The scientific specialty dealing with the issue of combat is agonistics. This article is devoted to the presentation of the main concepts of agonistics and the general combat theory. In the first section, the author searches for an answer to the question whether an agonist meets the basic criteria of a scientific theory. The second section is devoted to the presentation of its main category, which is  the concept of struggle. The last chapter refers to the purposeful cause of this theory represented by the concept of victory. This article confronts praxeological and sociological content with concepts characteristic of martial arts, and its main idea is to harmonize divergent insights on the phenomenon of struggle and victory, the main categories of agonistics. The research used theoretical (analysis, synthesis, comparison, inference and generalization) and empirical methods have been used. Additionally, a diagnostic survey has included the expert interview technique. The research results are presented in individual subsections of the article.","PeriodicalId":436921,"journal":{"name":"Safety & Defense","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety & Defense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37105/SD.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions of how to overcome problems are probably the basic questions of fighters. Answers to them, from a historical perspective, the principles of martial art have been provided. These provisions, often mutually exclusive, raise questions related to the scientific approach to this issue. The scientific specialty dealing with the issue of combat is agonistics. This article is devoted to the presentation of the main concepts of agonistics and the general combat theory. In the first section, the author searches for an answer to the question whether an agonist meets the basic criteria of a scientific theory. The second section is devoted to the presentation of its main category, which is  the concept of struggle. The last chapter refers to the purposeful cause of this theory represented by the concept of victory. This article confronts praxeological and sociological content with concepts characteristic of martial arts, and its main idea is to harmonize divergent insights on the phenomenon of struggle and victory, the main categories of agonistics. The research used theoretical (analysis, synthesis, comparison, inference and generalization) and empirical methods have been used. Additionally, a diagnostic survey has included the expert interview technique. The research results are presented in individual subsections of the article.
战斗与胜利:战争学、行动学与兵法中的基本术语
如何克服困难的问题可能是战士的基本问题。对这些问题的答案,从历史的角度来看,武术的原则已经提供了。这些条款往往相互排斥,提出了与科学方法有关的问题。研究战斗问题的科学专业是格斗学。本文主要介绍了格斗的主要概念和一般作战理论。在第一部分中,作者对激动剂是否符合科学理论的基本标准这一问题寻求答案。第二部分专门介绍其主要范畴,即斗争的概念。最后一章论述了以胜利观为代表的这一理论产生的目的性原因。本文以武术的概念来面对行动学和社会学的内容,其主要思想是协调对斗争现象和胜利现象的不同见解,这是格斗学的主要范畴。本研究采用了理论方法(分析、综合、比较、推理、概括)和实证方法。此外,诊断性调查还包括专家访谈技术。研究结果在文章的各个小节中提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信