Clinical investigation of potency and onset of different lidocaine sprays for topical anesthesia in dentistry.

M Daubländer, W Roth, P P Kleeman
{"title":"Clinical investigation of potency and onset of different lidocaine sprays for topical anesthesia in dentistry.","authors":"M Daubländer,&nbsp;W Roth,&nbsp;P P Kleeman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical effects of three lidocaine-containing solutions with and without frigen (freon-113) as a propellant, after different waiting periods, and with different dosages applied were investigated in 130 outpatients who were undergoing dental treatment in the maxilla under local anesthesia. They were divided randomly into five groups (A through E): (A) Xylocaine spray with frigen, two applications (20 mg lidocaine); (B) Xylestesin spray with frigen, two applications (14 mg lidocaine); (C) Xylestesin spray with frigen, three applications (21 mg lidocaine); (D) Xylestesin pump spray without frigen, two applications (14 mg lidocaine); and (E) no topical anesthesia. They were further divided into 12 subgroups to evaluate waiting periods between the application of the topical anesthesia and the injection (1, 2, or 3 minutes). Patients assessed the pain of the injection, intensity of numbness, and intensity of the taste on a visual analog scale; they also assessed the pain of the injection compared to former injections. Pain during injection was reduced by topical application of lidocaine. A waiting period of 2 minutes proved to be sufficient and can be justified to avoid impatience and increased numbness in patients. However, a 3-minute waiting period may be appropriate for sensitive patients. An increase in the dosage failed to show better analgesia. The pump spray without frigen proved to be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":76997,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & pain control in dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"25-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & pain control in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical effects of three lidocaine-containing solutions with and without frigen (freon-113) as a propellant, after different waiting periods, and with different dosages applied were investigated in 130 outpatients who were undergoing dental treatment in the maxilla under local anesthesia. They were divided randomly into five groups (A through E): (A) Xylocaine spray with frigen, two applications (20 mg lidocaine); (B) Xylestesin spray with frigen, two applications (14 mg lidocaine); (C) Xylestesin spray with frigen, three applications (21 mg lidocaine); (D) Xylestesin pump spray without frigen, two applications (14 mg lidocaine); and (E) no topical anesthesia. They were further divided into 12 subgroups to evaluate waiting periods between the application of the topical anesthesia and the injection (1, 2, or 3 minutes). Patients assessed the pain of the injection, intensity of numbness, and intensity of the taste on a visual analog scale; they also assessed the pain of the injection compared to former injections. Pain during injection was reduced by topical application of lidocaine. A waiting period of 2 minutes proved to be sufficient and can be justified to avoid impatience and increased numbness in patients. However, a 3-minute waiting period may be appropriate for sensitive patients. An increase in the dosage failed to show better analgesia. The pump spray without frigen proved to be effective.

不同利多卡因喷雾剂用于口腔表面麻醉的效价和起效的临床研究。
本文对130例门诊上颌局部麻醉牙科治疗患者,在不同的等待时间和不同的剂量下,分别用含利多卡因溶液(氟利昂-113)和不含氟利昂-113作为推进剂)进行临床疗效观察。随机分为5组(A ~ E):(A)木卡因喷雾加冷冻剂,两次应用(利多卡因20 mg);(B)木酯素喷雾剂加冷冻剂,2次(利多卡因14 mg);(C)木酯素喷雾加冷冻剂,3次(利多卡因21毫克);(D)木糖醇泵喷雾,不冷冻,两次(利多卡因14 mg);(E)不进行表面麻醉。他们被进一步分为12个亚组,以评估应用表面麻醉和注射之间的等待时间(1,2,3分钟)。患者在视觉模拟量表上评估注射疼痛、麻木强度和味道强度;他们还评估了与以前注射相比,注射后的疼痛程度。局部应用利多卡因减轻了注射时的疼痛。2分钟的等待时间证明是足够的,可以合理地避免病人不耐烦和增加麻木。然而,对于敏感患者,3分钟的等待时间可能是合适的。增加剂量并没有显示出更好的镇痛效果。试验证明,无冷泵喷雾是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书