Comparison of external treatment of Acupuncture and moxibustion and intervention of Chinese and Western Medicine on postoperative pain of hemorrhoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis

X. Zou, Q. Liu, L. Gao, H. Zhao
{"title":"Comparison of external treatment of Acupuncture and moxibustion and intervention of Chinese and Western Medicine on postoperative pain of hemorrhoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"X. Zou, Q. Liu, L. Gao, H. Zhao","doi":"10.1101/2023.01.20.23284830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of postoperative pain of hemorrhoids compared with traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine. Methods The CNKI, pubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Wan Fang, VIP, CBM, WOS, Bailian Yun Library and other databases were systematically retrieved from 2017 to October 2022 for clinical randomized controlled trials of acupuncture versus traditional Chinese and Western medicine for postoperative pain in hemorrhoids. The two evaluators independently retrieved, sifted through literature and extracted data for inclusion in a randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for the treatment of hemorrhoid pain that matched the study. Literature quality assessment was performed using RevMan5.4 for meta-analysis. Results A total of 540 related literature articles were retrieved, of which 139 were from CNKI, 104 from Wan Fang, 104 from VIP26, 7 from PubMed, 9 from Cochrane, 35 from WOS, 173 from China Biomedical Literature Database, 1 from Science Direct and 46 from the Bailian Yun Library, Screening resulted in inclusion of 10 RCTs including 870 patients. Meta analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the degree of pain in 2 hours [MD=0.01, 95%CI (- 0.23, 0.24), P [≤] 0.95]. And it showed that the total effective rate of the two groups was [RR=1.14, 95%CI (1.06, 1.24), P [≤] 0.0001], intervention for 2days pain degree was [MD=-0.41, 95%CI (- 0.69, 0.13), P [≤] 0.004], the incidence of adverse reaction was [RR=0.15, 95%CI (0.03, 0.79), P=0.03], the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Drug treatment is effective quickly, analgesia effect is better than acupuncture in early treatment, but the effect is not lasting. Acupuncture treatment is slow to start but the effects of acupuncture will gradually become apparent at a later stage. However, due to the low quality of inclusion, multicenter, large sample size and double-blind randomized controlled trials are still needed.","PeriodicalId":338270,"journal":{"name":"Medical Theory and Hypothesis","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Theory and Hypothesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.20.23284830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of postoperative pain of hemorrhoids compared with traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine. Methods The CNKI, pubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Wan Fang, VIP, CBM, WOS, Bailian Yun Library and other databases were systematically retrieved from 2017 to October 2022 for clinical randomized controlled trials of acupuncture versus traditional Chinese and Western medicine for postoperative pain in hemorrhoids. The two evaluators independently retrieved, sifted through literature and extracted data for inclusion in a randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for the treatment of hemorrhoid pain that matched the study. Literature quality assessment was performed using RevMan5.4 for meta-analysis. Results A total of 540 related literature articles were retrieved, of which 139 were from CNKI, 104 from Wan Fang, 104 from VIP26, 7 from PubMed, 9 from Cochrane, 35 from WOS, 173 from China Biomedical Literature Database, 1 from Science Direct and 46 from the Bailian Yun Library, Screening resulted in inclusion of 10 RCTs including 870 patients. Meta analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the degree of pain in 2 hours [MD=0.01, 95%CI (- 0.23, 0.24), P [≤] 0.95]. And it showed that the total effective rate of the two groups was [RR=1.14, 95%CI (1.06, 1.24), P [≤] 0.0001], intervention for 2days pain degree was [MD=-0.41, 95%CI (- 0.69, 0.13), P [≤] 0.004], the incidence of adverse reaction was [RR=0.15, 95%CI (0.03, 0.79), P=0.03], the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Drug treatment is effective quickly, analgesia effect is better than acupuncture in early treatment, but the effect is not lasting. Acupuncture treatment is slow to start but the effects of acupuncture will gradually become apparent at a later stage. However, due to the low quality of inclusion, multicenter, large sample size and double-blind randomized controlled trials are still needed.
针灸外敷与中西医干预治疗痔疮术后疼痛的比较:系统综述与荟萃分析
目的评价针灸治疗痔疮术后疼痛的临床疗效和安全性,并与中西医结合进行比较。方法系统检索中国知网(CNKI)、pubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Science Direct、万方、VIP、CBM、WOS、百联云图书馆等数据库,检索2017 - 2022年10月针灸与中西医结合治疗痔疮术后疼痛的临床随机对照试验。两位评估人员独立检索、筛选文献并提取数据,纳入与该研究相匹配的针灸治疗痔疮痛的随机对照试验。文献质量评价采用RevMan5.4进行meta分析。结果共检索到相关文献540篇,其中CNKI 139篇,万方104篇,VIP26 104篇,PubMed 7篇,Cochrane 9篇,WOS 35篇,中国生物医学文献数据库173篇,Science Direct 1篇,百联云图书馆46篇,筛选入组10篇rct,共纳入870例患者。Meta分析显示两组患者2小时疼痛程度差异无统计学意义[MD=0.01, 95%CI (- 0.23, 0.24), P[≤]0.95]。结果显示,两组总有效率[RR=1.14, 95%CI (1.06, 1.24), P[≤]0.0001],干预2d疼痛程度[MD=-0.41, 95%CI (- 0.69, 0.13), P[≤]0.004],不良反应发生率[RR=0.15, 95%CI (0.03, 0.79), P=0.03],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论药物治疗见效快,镇痛效果优于针刺早期治疗,但效果不持久。针灸治疗开始缓慢,但针灸的效果会在后期逐渐显现。但由于纳入质量较低,仍需开展多中心、大样本量、双盲随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信