Studying Textual Studies:Problems and AgendasModiano, Raimonda, Leroy F.Searle, andPeter Shillingsburg, eds.Voice, Text, Hypertext: Emerging Practices in Textual Studies

J. Bryant
{"title":"Studying Textual Studies:Problems and AgendasModiano, Raimonda, Leroy F.Searle, andPeter Shillingsburg, eds.Voice, Text, Hypertext: Emerging Practices in Textual Studies","authors":"J. Bryant","doi":"10.2979/TEX.2008.3.2.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"VOICE. TEXT. HYPERTEXT. EACH TERM REPRESENTS A DISTINCT \"moment\" in the development of textuality, from orality to literacy to digitization. But each is also the scene of considerable dispute, a point not at all lost on the editors and contributors of the volume under review. How distinct are these \"moments\"? How momentous? What threads of human consciousness connect them? What technologies advance them? For that matter, in what ways are this book's featured transmission technologiesspeech, inscription, print, pixel-at all relevant to the phenomenon of textuality? The subtitle's focus on the \"practices\" of textual study indicate problems articulated for some future disciplinary agenda. How might we study these transitional, evolutionary textual phenomena, edit them for critics and students, and bring them and textual criticism to center stage in current critical thinking and pedagogy? Voice, Text, Hypertext is at times ungainly, but a gamesome and thoroughly engrossing field book that should inspire cosmopolitan research, critical editing, and interpretation. Of the three organizing principles, the least accessible and hence most compelling is Voice. The age of the voiced text was an age of memory, performance, and textual evolution. Authority resided not so much in the text as in its singer, an individual of demonstrable memory, spiritual depth, and theatrical skill. What must it have been like when singers developed written aids to prompt their memory; or when full performances were first transcribed; or when transcriptions simply replaced singing: when agency was transferred from singer to writer, and authority was lodged, indeed sacralized, in words not sung but written? Reflecting on these imagined moments of transition deepens our appreciation of both the substance and insubstantiality of textuality. Despite the efforts of Walter J. Ong and others, the","PeriodicalId":447122,"journal":{"name":"Textual Cultures: Text, Contexts, Interpretation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Textual Cultures: Text, Contexts, Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/TEX.2008.3.2.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

VOICE. TEXT. HYPERTEXT. EACH TERM REPRESENTS A DISTINCT "moment" in the development of textuality, from orality to literacy to digitization. But each is also the scene of considerable dispute, a point not at all lost on the editors and contributors of the volume under review. How distinct are these "moments"? How momentous? What threads of human consciousness connect them? What technologies advance them? For that matter, in what ways are this book's featured transmission technologiesspeech, inscription, print, pixel-at all relevant to the phenomenon of textuality? The subtitle's focus on the "practices" of textual study indicate problems articulated for some future disciplinary agenda. How might we study these transitional, evolutionary textual phenomena, edit them for critics and students, and bring them and textual criticism to center stage in current critical thinking and pedagogy? Voice, Text, Hypertext is at times ungainly, but a gamesome and thoroughly engrossing field book that should inspire cosmopolitan research, critical editing, and interpretation. Of the three organizing principles, the least accessible and hence most compelling is Voice. The age of the voiced text was an age of memory, performance, and textual evolution. Authority resided not so much in the text as in its singer, an individual of demonstrable memory, spiritual depth, and theatrical skill. What must it have been like when singers developed written aids to prompt their memory; or when full performances were first transcribed; or when transcriptions simply replaced singing: when agency was transferred from singer to writer, and authority was lodged, indeed sacralized, in words not sung but written? Reflecting on these imagined moments of transition deepens our appreciation of both the substance and insubstantiality of textuality. Despite the efforts of Walter J. Ong and others, the
《文本研究:问题与议程》莫迪亚诺、雷蒙达、勒罗伊·f·塞尔和彼得·希林斯伯格编。语音、文本、超文本:文本研究中的新兴实践
的声音。文本。超文本。从口语到识字再到数字化,每一个术语都代表了文本发展的一个独特的“时刻”。但每一本书也都引发了相当大的争议,这一点在本书的编辑和撰稿人身上一点也不陌生。这些“时刻”有多明显?重大的如何?人类意识的哪些线索将它们联系在一起?是什么技术推动了它们的发展?就此而言,这本书的特色传播技术——语音、铭文、印刷、像素——在哪些方面与文本性现象相关?副标题对文本研究“实践”的关注表明了一些未来学科议程所阐述的问题。我们如何研究这些过渡性的、进化的文本现象,为评论家和学生编辑它们,并将它们和文本批评置于当前批判性思维和教育学的中心位置?《声音,文本,超文本》有时显得笨拙,但却是一本有趣的、引人入胜的领域著作,应该能激发世界范围的研究、批判性的编辑和解释。在这三个组织原则中,最不容易实现,但也最引人注目的是Voice。语音文本的时代是一个记忆、表演和文本进化的时代。权威与其说是存在于歌词中,不如说是存在于演唱者身上,演唱者是一个具有明显记忆力、精神深度和戏剧技巧的人。当歌手发明了书面辅助工具来促进他们的记忆时,那一定是什么样子;或者当完整的表演第一次被转录;或者当唱词简单地取代了歌唱,当代理权从歌手转移到作家,权威被赋予,甚至被神圣化,不是用歌唱的,而是用书写的?对这些想象中的过渡时刻的反思加深了我们对文本的实质和非实质的欣赏。尽管沃尔特·j·翁等人做出了努力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信