セクシュアリティ化される男性性の理想:1930―80年代の米国フィジカル・カルチャー雑誌における男性身体表象とホモソーシャル連続体

桂一 岡田
{"title":"セクシュアリティ化される男性性の理想:1930―80年代の米国フィジカル・カルチャー雑誌における男性身体表象とホモソーシャル連続体","authors":"桂一 岡田","doi":"10.5432/JJPEHSS.15110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed the momentum of the (hetero) sexualization of masculinity through physical culture magazines published during the 1930s-1980s in the United States, and also examined the social conditions caused by the corresponding changes. Since Foucault suggested the \"repressive hypothesis\" of sexuality, it has been widely recognized that, at some moment in modern history, same sex desire was identified as an inevitable identity, rather than just a deviant act, as considered previously. However, several recent studies have questioned this hypothesis as being oversimplified. By reviewing previous research, this study examined the momentum of segregation between hetero/homosexual desire, which was observed in the 1950s, i.e. much more recently than generally recognized, and the obvious hetero-sexualization of the masculine ideal, which occurred after the 1970s. The method employed was to compare 2 major physical culture magazines. To provide a contrasting perspective with regard to different sexuality, the first (famous) physique magazine, which began to be published in 1951 for potentially homosexual customers, was adopted to comparatively and diachronically examine the representation of male figures on the cover pages. This analysis revealed the following results: 1. During the 1930s-1950s, the ideal of masculinity was not yet hetero-sexualized and exemplified a broad range of desire which was not yet segregated as hetero/homosexual. 2. During the 1950s-1960s, physical culture magazines started to exclude non-heterosexual elements from their representations because of the risk that they could be potentially interpreted as homosexual. 3. The rise of the sexual minority rights movement in and after the 1970s, and the 1980s AIDS panic promoted homosexual visibility and expedited homophobia as a form of counter-action. This advance caused rapid and obvious hetero-sexualization of mainstream physical culture media. In conclusion, the reason for the hetero-sexualization of physical culture magazines was a reaction to the increasing presence of homosexuals. It could be said that the rise of heterosexual self-consciousness itself was, to some extent, a counter to, and paradoxically caused by the creation and increasing awareness of homosexual identity. Moreover, these changes in the masculine ideal, and especially the examples before the 1950s, suggest the possibility of an ideal masculinity shared by hetero/homosexual males, which Sedgwick (1985) suggests is a homosocial continuum--namely, homosociality without discontinuity between homosocial and homosexual desire.","PeriodicalId":147719,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences","volume":"361 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5432/JJPEHSS.15110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzed the momentum of the (hetero) sexualization of masculinity through physical culture magazines published during the 1930s-1980s in the United States, and also examined the social conditions caused by the corresponding changes. Since Foucault suggested the "repressive hypothesis" of sexuality, it has been widely recognized that, at some moment in modern history, same sex desire was identified as an inevitable identity, rather than just a deviant act, as considered previously. However, several recent studies have questioned this hypothesis as being oversimplified. By reviewing previous research, this study examined the momentum of segregation between hetero/homosexual desire, which was observed in the 1950s, i.e. much more recently than generally recognized, and the obvious hetero-sexualization of the masculine ideal, which occurred after the 1970s. The method employed was to compare 2 major physical culture magazines. To provide a contrasting perspective with regard to different sexuality, the first (famous) physique magazine, which began to be published in 1951 for potentially homosexual customers, was adopted to comparatively and diachronically examine the representation of male figures on the cover pages. This analysis revealed the following results: 1. During the 1930s-1950s, the ideal of masculinity was not yet hetero-sexualized and exemplified a broad range of desire which was not yet segregated as hetero/homosexual. 2. During the 1950s-1960s, physical culture magazines started to exclude non-heterosexual elements from their representations because of the risk that they could be potentially interpreted as homosexual. 3. The rise of the sexual minority rights movement in and after the 1970s, and the 1980s AIDS panic promoted homosexual visibility and expedited homophobia as a form of counter-action. This advance caused rapid and obvious hetero-sexualization of mainstream physical culture media. In conclusion, the reason for the hetero-sexualization of physical culture magazines was a reaction to the increasing presence of homosexuals. It could be said that the rise of heterosexual self-consciousness itself was, to some extent, a counter to, and paradoxically caused by the creation and increasing awareness of homosexual identity. Moreover, these changes in the masculine ideal, and especially the examples before the 1950s, suggest the possibility of an ideal masculinity shared by hetero/homosexual males, which Sedgwick (1985) suggests is a homosocial continuum--namely, homosociality without discontinuity between homosocial and homosexual desire.
被性取向化的男性理想:20世纪30 - 80年代美国物理文化杂志上的男性身体表象与同性恋社会连续体
本研究通过美国20世纪30 - 80年代出版的体育杂志,分析了男性气质(异性)性化的势头,并考察了相应变化所引起的社会条件。自从福柯提出性的“压抑假说”以来,人们已经广泛认识到,在现代历史的某个时刻,同性欲望被认定为一种不可避免的身份,而不仅仅是一种越轨行为,就像之前所考虑的那样。然而,最近的几项研究质疑这一假设过于简化。通过回顾以往的研究,本研究考察了异性恋/同性恋欲望隔离的势头,这种隔离出现在20世纪50年代,即比一般认为的要晚得多,而男性理想的异性化则出现在20世纪70年代之后。采用比较两种主要体育杂志的方法。为了提供一个关于不同性别的对比视角,1951年开始出版的第一本(著名的)体质杂志,针对潜在的同性恋顾客,采用了比较和历时性的方法来研究封面上男性形象的表现。这一分析揭示了以下结果:在20世纪30年代至50年代,理想的男子气概还没有异性化,体现了广泛的欲望,还没有被区分为异性恋/同性恋。2. 在20世纪50年代至60年代,体育杂志开始将非异性恋元素排除在他们的表现之外,因为他们有可能被解读为同性恋。3.在20世纪70年代和之后,性少数群体权利运动的兴起,以及80年代的艾滋病恐慌,促进了同性恋的知名度,并加速了同性恋恐惧症作为一种对抗形式。这一进步导致主流体育媒体的异性化迅速而明显。总之,体育杂志异性化的原因是对越来越多的同性恋者的反应。可以说,异性恋自我意识的兴起本身在某种程度上是与同性恋身份认同的产生和意识的增强相矛盾的。此外,男性理想的这些变化,尤其是20世纪50年代之前的例子,表明异性恋/同性恋男性共享理想男性气质的可能性,塞奇威克(1985)认为这是一种同性恋社会连续体——即同性恋社会和同性恋欲望之间没有间断的同性恋社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信