The Caste of Cinema and the Cinema of Caste: Shooting the Dalit 24 Frames Per Second

Patrali Chatterjee
{"title":"The Caste of Cinema and the Cinema of Caste: Shooting the Dalit 24 Frames Per Second","authors":"Patrali Chatterjee","doi":"10.48189/nl.2023.v04i2.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though Bombay has been hailed as the capital of Indian Cinema, film enthusiasts and connoisseurs would agree that it is South Indian Cinema that deserves the honour. It was 1936 when the ‘social’ films tainted with politics infiltrated the sphere of Tamil Cinema and since then, it has become extremely pervasive in all spheres of life, particularly political life. During the first phase of Tamil Cinema, that is in the pre-1950s, films such as Sevasadanam (1938), and Sabapathy (1941) were an instrument to represent the upper caste communities with upper caste protagonists revelling in their privileges. The recent phase not only addresses the caste issues explicitly but lets the Dalit occupy the centre stage. This was initiated by director Pa Ranjith in his films Madras (2014), Kabali (2016), Kaala (2018), Sarpatta Parambarai (2021) and as a producer for Pariyerum Perumal (2018). The film industry of Tamil Nadu is as heterogenous as the Indian society and has metamorphosed into an instrument incumbent for understanding the battleground of the caste system of India. My paper attempts to analyse the ways in which caste-based films are affecting the politics of Tamil Nadu and vice versa. My paper intends to reflect on how the caste-based cinematic themes have created class consciousness on one hand, but have given rise to caste-based narcissism among the people of the same caste on the other. Among this chaos and dichotomy, the enormous popularity, as well as the commercial success of films like Pariyerum Perumal and Asuran (2019), and Karnan (2021), deserves a detailed study that would enable us critically assess the cinematic representation of Dalits and their perils in the quest for social identity and acknowledgment.","PeriodicalId":205595,"journal":{"name":"New Literaria","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2023.v04i2.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even though Bombay has been hailed as the capital of Indian Cinema, film enthusiasts and connoisseurs would agree that it is South Indian Cinema that deserves the honour. It was 1936 when the ‘social’ films tainted with politics infiltrated the sphere of Tamil Cinema and since then, it has become extremely pervasive in all spheres of life, particularly political life. During the first phase of Tamil Cinema, that is in the pre-1950s, films such as Sevasadanam (1938), and Sabapathy (1941) were an instrument to represent the upper caste communities with upper caste protagonists revelling in their privileges. The recent phase not only addresses the caste issues explicitly but lets the Dalit occupy the centre stage. This was initiated by director Pa Ranjith in his films Madras (2014), Kabali (2016), Kaala (2018), Sarpatta Parambarai (2021) and as a producer for Pariyerum Perumal (2018). The film industry of Tamil Nadu is as heterogenous as the Indian society and has metamorphosed into an instrument incumbent for understanding the battleground of the caste system of India. My paper attempts to analyse the ways in which caste-based films are affecting the politics of Tamil Nadu and vice versa. My paper intends to reflect on how the caste-based cinematic themes have created class consciousness on one hand, but have given rise to caste-based narcissism among the people of the same caste on the other. Among this chaos and dichotomy, the enormous popularity, as well as the commercial success of films like Pariyerum Perumal and Asuran (2019), and Karnan (2021), deserves a detailed study that would enable us critically assess the cinematic representation of Dalits and their perils in the quest for social identity and acknowledgment.
电影种姓和种姓电影:拍摄达利特每秒24帧
尽管孟买被誉为印度电影之都,但电影爱好者和鉴赏家都会同意,南印度电影才配得上这一荣誉。1936年,带有政治色彩的“社会”电影渗透到泰米尔电影领域,从那时起,它在生活的各个领域,尤其是政治生活中变得极其普遍。在泰米尔电影的第一阶段,也就是20世纪50年代前,像《塞瓦萨达南》(1938年)和《萨帕帕蒂》(1941年)这样的电影是代表上层种姓社区的工具,上层种姓的主角陶醉于他们的特权。最近的阶段不仅明确地解决了种姓问题,而且让达利特占据了中心舞台。这是由导演Pa Ranjith在他的电影《Madras》(2014年)、《Kabali》(2016年)、《Kaala》(2018年)、《Sarpatta Parambarai》(2021年)以及《Pariyerum Perumal》(2018年)中发起的。泰米尔纳德邦的电影业与印度社会一样具有异质性,已经蜕变为理解印度种姓制度战场的工具。我的论文试图分析以种姓为基础的电影影响泰米尔纳德邦政治的方式,反之亦然。我的论文旨在反思基于种姓的电影主题如何一方面创造了阶级意识,但另一方面却在同一种姓的人们中引起了基于种姓的自恋。在这种混乱和两分法中,像Pariyerum Perumal和Asuran(2019)以及Karnan(2021)这样的电影的巨大人气和商业成功值得我们进行详细的研究,这将使我们能够批判性地评估达利特人的电影表现及其在寻求社会认同和承认方面的危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信