An Experiment Evaluating the Impact of Large-Scale, High-Payoff Vaccine Regret Lotteries

Linnea Gandhi, Katherine L. Milkman, Sean F. Ellis, Heather N. Graci, Dena M. Gromet, Rayyan S Mobarak, A. Buttenheim, A. Duckworth, Devin Pope, Ala Stanford, R. Thaler, K. Volpp
{"title":"An Experiment Evaluating the Impact of Large-Scale, High-Payoff Vaccine Regret Lotteries","authors":"Linnea Gandhi, Katherine L. Milkman, Sean F. Ellis, Heather N. Graci, Dena M. Gromet, Rayyan S Mobarak, A. Buttenheim, A. Duckworth, Devin Pope, Ala Stanford, R. Thaler, K. Volpp","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3904365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a pre-registered experiment testing the effects of three, high-payoff (up to $50,000) vaccine regret lotteries in Philadelphia. In each drawing, residents of a randomly selected “treatment” zip code received half of the 12 lottery prizes (boosting their chances to 59-98x those of their neighbors). Our quasi-experimental results yield mixed estimates of the benefits of these lotteries for Philadelphia’s overall vaccination rate. Our experimental results, however, offer a causal estimate of the limited return on even high-odds vaccine lotteries. Difference-in-difference regressions estimate the first treated zip code experienced an insignificant 11% jump in vaccinations compared to control zip codes. Pooling results from all three, we do not detect significant benefits from treatment, and our 95% confidence interval bounds the benefits at 9%.","PeriodicalId":289555,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Decision-Making & National Security (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Decision-Making & National Security (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

We present a pre-registered experiment testing the effects of three, high-payoff (up to $50,000) vaccine regret lotteries in Philadelphia. In each drawing, residents of a randomly selected “treatment” zip code received half of the 12 lottery prizes (boosting their chances to 59-98x those of their neighbors). Our quasi-experimental results yield mixed estimates of the benefits of these lotteries for Philadelphia’s overall vaccination rate. Our experimental results, however, offer a causal estimate of the limited return on even high-odds vaccine lotteries. Difference-in-difference regressions estimate the first treated zip code experienced an insignificant 11% jump in vaccinations compared to control zip codes. Pooling results from all three, we do not detect significant benefits from treatment, and our 95% confidence interval bounds the benefits at 9%.
评估大规模、高回报疫苗后悔彩票影响的实验
我们提出了一项预先注册的实验,测试费城三种高回报(高达50,000美元)疫苗后悔彩票的效果。在每次抽奖中,随机选择“治疗”邮政编码的居民获得12个彩票奖金的一半(将他们的机会提高到邻居的59-98倍)。我们的准实验结果对这些彩票对费城整体疫苗接种率的好处产生了不同的估计。然而,我们的实验结果提供了一个因果估计,即使是高赔率的疫苗彩票也有有限的回报。差异中差异回归估计,与对照邮政编码相比,第一个处理邮政编码的疫苗接种率微不足道地增加了11%。综合这三者的结果,我们没有发现治疗的显著益处,我们的95%置信区间将益处限定在9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信