Principles toward Optimization of Characters in a Semantic-Writing
System
P. New
{"title":"Principles toward Optimization of Characters in a Semantic-Writing\n System","authors":"P. New","doi":"10.22425/jul.2022.23.2.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semantic characters such as for ‘skiing’ represent meaning rather than sound. For centuries, great minds such as Descartes, Leibniz, Francis Lodowyck, and Rev. John Wilkins have called for the creation of a writing-system comprised completely of semantic characters. Such a writing-system must possess enough characters to represent the universe; But too many characters will pose a challenge for users to learn and remember. This article argues for principles limiting the number of basic, non-derived characters (“radicals”) while maximizing the expressive power coaxed from them. I advance three primary strategies here: First, use of the arrow or other Paul Lance New, Jr. ESL-Instructor, MA Linguistics, University of Texas El Paso, USA Email: paulnew@paulnew.com Received 27 June, 2022; Revised 1 August, 2022; Accepted 24 September, 2022 Copyright © 2022 Language Research Institute, Sejong University Journal of Universal Language is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed online under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 24 Principles toward Optimization of Characters in a Semantic-Writing System selector to derive related meanings from one radical (e.g., for ‘skier’ as opposed to (no arrow) for ‘skiing’); Second, a series of “radical-disqualifiers” requiring most concepts or notions to be derived from one or more radicals, rather than being represented by one radical. Finally, constructing radicals from smaller elements whose meanings are consistent across them (e.g., if we designate the single-shafted arrow to mean ‘change’, then it should appear with that meaning in all radicals dealing with change.). Ample visual examples illustrating these points are given, applying these principles to Egyptian, Chinese, Mayan and some modern constructed systems.","PeriodicalId":231529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Universal Language","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Universal Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2022.23.2.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Semantic characters such as for ‘skiing’ represent meaning rather than sound. For centuries, great minds such as Descartes, Leibniz, Francis Lodowyck, and Rev. John Wilkins have called for the creation of a writing-system comprised completely of semantic characters. Such a writing-system must possess enough characters to represent the universe; But too many characters will pose a challenge for users to learn and remember. This article argues for principles limiting the number of basic, non-derived characters (“radicals”) while maximizing the expressive power coaxed from them. I advance three primary strategies here: First, use of the arrow or other Paul Lance New, Jr. ESL-Instructor, MA Linguistics, University of Texas El Paso, USA Email: paulnew@paulnew.com Received 27 June, 2022; Revised 1 August, 2022; Accepted 24 September, 2022 Copyright © 2022 Language Research Institute, Sejong University Journal of Universal Language is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed online under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 24 Principles toward Optimization of Characters in a Semantic-Writing System selector to derive related meanings from one radical (e.g., for ‘skier’ as opposed to (no arrow) for ‘skiing’); Second, a series of “radical-disqualifiers” requiring most concepts or notions to be derived from one or more radicals, rather than being represented by one radical. Finally, constructing radicals from smaller elements whose meanings are consistent across them (e.g., if we designate the single-shafted arrow to mean ‘change’, then it should appear with that meaning in all radicals dealing with change.). Ample visual examples illustrating these points are given, applying these principles to Egyptian, Chinese, Mayan and some modern constructed systems.
语义书写系统中字符的优化原则
像“skiing”这样的语义字符代表的是意义而不是声音。几个世纪以来,诸如笛卡儿、莱布尼茨、弗朗西斯·洛多维克和约翰·威尔金斯牧师等伟大的思想家都呼吁创造一种完全由语义字符组成的书写系统。这样的书写系统必须拥有足够的字符来代表宇宙;但是太多的字符会给用户的学习和记忆带来挑战。本文主张限制基本、非派生字符(“部首”)数量的原则,同时最大限度地利用它们的表达能力。我在这里提出了三个主要策略:首先,使用箭头或其他Paul Lance New, Jr. esl讲师,语言学硕士,德克萨斯大学埃尔帕索,美国电子邮件:paulnew@paulnew.com收到2022年6月27日;2022年8月1日修订;版权所有©2022语言研究所,世宗大学通用语言杂志是一个开放获取期刊。所有文章都是在知识共享署名非商业许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)的条款下在线发布的,该许可允许不受限制的非商业使用、分发和在任何媒体上复制,只要原始作品被适当引用。在语义书写系统选择器中,从一个词根(例如,“skier”与“skiing”(没有箭头)相对)派生相关含义的字符优化原则;第二,一系列的“激进否定”要求大多数概念或概念来自一个或多个激进,而不是由一个激进来表示。最后,从意义一致的较小元素构建基(例如,如果我们指定单轴箭头表示“变化”,那么它应该出现在所有与变化有关的基中)。举例说明这些观点,并将这些原则应用于埃及、中国、玛雅和一些现代建筑系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。