Localities in critical literacy practice: a critical review of the frameworks

Nita Novianti, Angela Thomas, V. To
{"title":"Localities in critical literacy practice: a critical review of the frameworks","authors":"Nita Novianti, Angela Thomas, V. To","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1970-2221/11471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large number of frameworks and models have been created to help translate the highly philosophical theory of critical literacy into practice. How these frameworks have been translated into classroom practice is an area much unexplored. The present study critically reviewed the frameworks of critical literacy applied in the classroom practices of language arts and language education within the last twenty years. Adapting the classification put forward by Luke and Woods (2009), the review divides the frameworks into critical pedagogy, textual, and practical approaches. The application of the frameworks identified in this review defies the rigid divisions between critical and textual approaches because text still plays an important role. The additional category of practical approaches is created to refer to frameworks that combine the critical and textual approaches and include more key tenets of critical literacy with a stronger focus on classroom practices. The more recent frameworks are increasingly embracing more key tenets of critical literacy, but the tenet of localities still has no place in these frameworks. Nonetheless, a small number of classroom practices have carefully included localities in the design and enactment of critical literacy.","PeriodicalId":366273,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1970-2221/11471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large number of frameworks and models have been created to help translate the highly philosophical theory of critical literacy into practice. How these frameworks have been translated into classroom practice is an area much unexplored. The present study critically reviewed the frameworks of critical literacy applied in the classroom practices of language arts and language education within the last twenty years. Adapting the classification put forward by Luke and Woods (2009), the review divides the frameworks into critical pedagogy, textual, and practical approaches. The application of the frameworks identified in this review defies the rigid divisions between critical and textual approaches because text still plays an important role. The additional category of practical approaches is created to refer to frameworks that combine the critical and textual approaches and include more key tenets of critical literacy with a stronger focus on classroom practices. The more recent frameworks are increasingly embracing more key tenets of critical literacy, but the tenet of localities still has no place in these frameworks. Nonetheless, a small number of classroom practices have carefully included localities in the design and enactment of critical literacy.
批判性读写实践中的地方:对框架的批判性回顾
大量的框架和模型已经被创造出来,以帮助将高度哲学的批判性读写理论转化为实践。如何将这些框架转化为课堂实践是一个尚未探索的领域。本研究批判性地回顾了过去二十年来在语言艺术和语言教育课堂实践中应用的批判性素养框架。本文采用Luke和Woods(2009)提出的分类方法,将这些框架分为批判教学法、文本方法和实践方法。在本综述中确定的框架的应用挑战了批判性和文本方法之间的严格划分,因为文本仍然发挥着重要作用。实践方法的额外类别是指结合了批判性和文本方法的框架,包括更多的批判性读写的关键原则,更注重课堂实践。最近的框架越来越多地包含了批判性素养的更多关键原则,但地方原则仍然没有在这些框架中占有一席之地。尽管如此,少数课堂实践已经仔细地将批判性素养的设计和制定纳入了地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信