From bench to bedside with advanced confocal microendoscope

W. Piyawattanametha, M. Mandella, H. Ra, J. Liu, S. Friedland, Z. Qiu, G. Kino, T. D. Wang, C. Contag, O. Solgaard
{"title":"From bench to bedside with advanced confocal microendoscope","authors":"W. Piyawattanametha, M. Mandella, H. Ra, J. Liu, S. Friedland, Z. Qiu, G. Kino, T. D. Wang, C. Contag, O. Solgaard","doi":"10.1109/PHOTWTM.2010.5421940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Confocal microscopy is an indispensable tool for three-dimensional (3-D) imaging in both intravital and clinical settings. Because of its optical sectioning property achieved from its optical pinhole, it allows serial image stacking of each focus image plane to re-create volumetric imaging. Conventional single-axis confocal (SAC) microscopes have a tradeoff between resolution, field of view (FOV), and objective lens size, since a high numerical aperture (NA) lens is needed for sufficient resolution, and a long focal length is needed for a large FOV and working distance (WD). A dual-axes confocal (DAC) microscope architecture has been proposed utilizing two overlapping low NA beams, which effectively decouples these tradeoffs [1]. The DAC microscope offers several advantages over the SAC design. First, the higher NA required by the SAC design implies a smaller WD and smaller FOV. In contrast, the DAC design has a long WD, providing room for a postobjective MEMS scanner. Second, in the SAC design, the transverse resolution is substantially better than the axial resolution, while the DAC design provides balanced resolutions in all spatial dimensions. Third, the DAC design has superior optical sectioning because light scattered along the illumination path outside the focal volume couples to the output spatial filter with very low efficiency, enhancing both detection sensitivity and dynamic range. Previously, MEMS-scanner-based DAC microscopes have been demonstrated in a tabletop setup [2], and then in the first miniaturized proto-type system on a V-block with 1300- and 488-nm-wavelength, respectively [3, 4].","PeriodicalId":367324,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Photonics Society Winter Topicals Meeting Series (WTM)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Photonics Society Winter Topicals Meeting Series (WTM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PHOTWTM.2010.5421940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Confocal microscopy is an indispensable tool for three-dimensional (3-D) imaging in both intravital and clinical settings. Because of its optical sectioning property achieved from its optical pinhole, it allows serial image stacking of each focus image plane to re-create volumetric imaging. Conventional single-axis confocal (SAC) microscopes have a tradeoff between resolution, field of view (FOV), and objective lens size, since a high numerical aperture (NA) lens is needed for sufficient resolution, and a long focal length is needed for a large FOV and working distance (WD). A dual-axes confocal (DAC) microscope architecture has been proposed utilizing two overlapping low NA beams, which effectively decouples these tradeoffs [1]. The DAC microscope offers several advantages over the SAC design. First, the higher NA required by the SAC design implies a smaller WD and smaller FOV. In contrast, the DAC design has a long WD, providing room for a postobjective MEMS scanner. Second, in the SAC design, the transverse resolution is substantially better than the axial resolution, while the DAC design provides balanced resolutions in all spatial dimensions. Third, the DAC design has superior optical sectioning because light scattered along the illumination path outside the focal volume couples to the output spatial filter with very low efficiency, enhancing both detection sensitivity and dynamic range. Previously, MEMS-scanner-based DAC microscopes have been demonstrated in a tabletop setup [2], and then in the first miniaturized proto-type system on a V-block with 1300- and 488-nm-wavelength, respectively [3, 4].
先进的共聚焦显微内窥镜,从工作台到床边
共聚焦显微镜是一个不可缺少的工具,三维(3-D)成像在生命和临床设置。由于其光学针孔具有光学切片特性,因此可以对每个焦点图像平面进行串行图像叠加,以重新生成体成像。传统的单轴共聚焦(SAC)显微镜需要在分辨率、视场(FOV)和物镜尺寸之间进行权衡,因为高数值孔径(NA)透镜需要足够的分辨率,而长焦距需要大视场和工作距离(WD)。双轴共聚焦(DAC)显微镜结构利用两个重叠的低NA光束,有效地解耦了这些权衡[1]。与SAC设计相比,DAC显微镜有几个优点。首先,SAC设计要求的更高的NA意味着更小的WD和更小的FOV。相比之下,DAC设计具有较长的WD,为后物镜MEMS扫描仪提供了空间。其次,在SAC设计中,横向分辨率大大优于轴向分辨率,而DAC设计在所有空间维度上提供平衡的分辨率。第三,DAC设计具有优越的光学切片,因为光沿着焦体外的照明路径散射到输出空间滤波器,效率非常低,提高了检测灵敏度和动态范围。先前,基于mems扫描仪的DAC显微镜已经在桌面设置中进行了演示[2],然后在分别具有1300 nm和488 nm波长的v块上的第一个小型化原型系统中进行了演示[3,4]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信