The effect of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional perspective view displays on situation awareness during command and control

J. V. D. Meulen, J. R. Smith
{"title":"The effect of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional perspective view displays on situation awareness during command and control","authors":"J. V. D. Meulen, J. R. Smith","doi":"10.1109/COGSIMA.2015.7108180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the potential of information technologies, specifically 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) perspective view displays, on situation awareness (SA) in a command and control environment. Furthermore, the influence of experience on SA while using the displays was investigated. SA of 10 air mission controllers (AMCs) was evaluated while using both displays during a simulated interception scenario. The protocol required each AMC to command two fighter jets in order to complete a successful intercept. The SA requirements for the scenario were extracted using a goal directed task analysis whereby the SA queries were derived. Significant differences (p <; 0.05) were found between the 2D and 3D displays for Level 1 SA while no significant differences were found for Level 2 and Level 3. The experienced AMCs demonstrated higher levels of SA at all 3 levels irrespective of display type but the differences were not significant. It is therefore deemed that experience does not play a major role in gaining SA when using the 3D display. This was expected because neither group had any prior experience with the 3D display. Level 1 SA was significantly higher for both the experienced and less experienced groups when using the 2D display. Level 1 was also significantly higher than Level 3 for both the experienced and less experienced groups when using the 3D display. The implication of these results are that although the AMCs were able to comprehend the mission, they were unable to perceive and project accurately what was going to happen next in the scenario when using the 3D display. Therefore the 3D display did not contribute towards improved SA or provide an advantage to command and control performance above that of the 2D display.","PeriodicalId":373467,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision","volume":"2009 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2015.7108180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the potential of information technologies, specifically 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) perspective view displays, on situation awareness (SA) in a command and control environment. Furthermore, the influence of experience on SA while using the displays was investigated. SA of 10 air mission controllers (AMCs) was evaluated while using both displays during a simulated interception scenario. The protocol required each AMC to command two fighter jets in order to complete a successful intercept. The SA requirements for the scenario were extracted using a goal directed task analysis whereby the SA queries were derived. Significant differences (p <; 0.05) were found between the 2D and 3D displays for Level 1 SA while no significant differences were found for Level 2 and Level 3. The experienced AMCs demonstrated higher levels of SA at all 3 levels irrespective of display type but the differences were not significant. It is therefore deemed that experience does not play a major role in gaining SA when using the 3D display. This was expected because neither group had any prior experience with the 3D display. Level 1 SA was significantly higher for both the experienced and less experienced groups when using the 2D display. Level 1 was also significantly higher than Level 3 for both the experienced and less experienced groups when using the 3D display. The implication of these results are that although the AMCs were able to comprehend the mission, they were unable to perceive and project accurately what was going to happen next in the scenario when using the 3D display. Therefore the 3D display did not contribute towards improved SA or provide an advantage to command and control performance above that of the 2D display.
二维和三维视角对指挥控制过程中态势感知的影响
该研究的主要目的是评估信息技术的潜力,特别是2维(2D)和3维(3D)视角显示,在指挥和控制环境中的态势感知(SA)。此外,还研究了使用显示器时经验对SA的影响。在模拟拦截场景中,使用两种显示器对10个空中任务控制器(amc)的SA进行了评估。该协议要求每个AMC指挥两架战斗机,以完成一次成功的拦截。使用目标导向任务分析提取场景的SA需求,从而派生SA查询。显著性差异(p <;1级SA的2D和3D显示差异为0.05),而2级和3级SA的2D和3D显示差异无统计学意义。经验丰富的amc在所有3个水平上均表现出较高的SA水平,而与显示类型无关,但差异不显著。因此,在使用3D显示器时,经验在获得SA方面并不起主要作用。这是意料之中的,因为两组人之前都没有任何3D显示器的经验。当使用2D显示时,有经验组和经验不足组的1级SA均显著较高。在使用3D显示器时,有经验和经验不足的组的1级明显高于3级。这些结果的含义是,尽管amc能够理解任务,但当使用3D显示器时,它们无法准确地感知和预测接下来会发生什么。因此,3D显示器对改进SA没有贡献,也没有提供优于2D显示器的命令和控制性能的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信