Compensating Wage Differentials for Workplace Risks and Local Unemployment: New Evidence for Gender, Union, and Nonunion Workers in the USA

H. A. Mridha
{"title":"Compensating Wage Differentials for Workplace Risks and Local Unemployment: New Evidence for Gender, Union, and Nonunion Workers in the USA","authors":"H. A. Mridha","doi":"10.1353/jda.2022.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This study estimates the compensating wage differentials (CWDs) for work-related fatal injuries while controlling for the impact of local unemployment on the risk premium. The main argument is that the workers in occupations with fatal injury risk may not be fully compensated for workplacerelated injuries in high unemployment areas due to workers' weakening bargaining power. Two risk measures, employment-based and hour-based injury risks, are used to estimate the effects of different job risks on CWDs using both ordinary least squares (OLS) and the two-stage least squares (2SLS) methods. The risk measures are constructed from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data for the 2012-2016 period. The fatal injury risk data incorporate white and blue-collar occupations by gender and union membership status to estimate CWDs more accurately. The OLS estimates broadly support the theory of CWD. The CWDs for employmentbased fatal risks for union, nonunion, and female, and hour-based union workers increase when controlling for the local area unemployment, supporting a negative impact of unemployment on CWDs. Results show that, except for the employment-based male sample, the CWDs for union and male samples are larger than those for the nonunion and female samples. The endogeneity corrected results from the 2SLS confirm that workers receive the CWDs for their exposure to workplace-related fatal risks. However, results find no evidence of the effects of local area unemployment on the CWDs. The estimated values of a statistical life (VSL) of about $4.69 million to $31.79 million derived from OLS estimates are slightly above the estimates reported in the literature. These results are particularly important as an unbiased estimate of the CWD leads to the precise calculation of the VSL. The findings from this study would help policymakers understand the implication behind wage-fatality risk tradeoff in the workplace. The estimates of the VSL would allow them to design policies aimed at reducing workplace-related fatal injury risk and improving the worker's compensation system.","PeriodicalId":286315,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Developing Areas","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Developing Areas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2022.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This study estimates the compensating wage differentials (CWDs) for work-related fatal injuries while controlling for the impact of local unemployment on the risk premium. The main argument is that the workers in occupations with fatal injury risk may not be fully compensated for workplacerelated injuries in high unemployment areas due to workers' weakening bargaining power. Two risk measures, employment-based and hour-based injury risks, are used to estimate the effects of different job risks on CWDs using both ordinary least squares (OLS) and the two-stage least squares (2SLS) methods. The risk measures are constructed from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data for the 2012-2016 period. The fatal injury risk data incorporate white and blue-collar occupations by gender and union membership status to estimate CWDs more accurately. The OLS estimates broadly support the theory of CWD. The CWDs for employmentbased fatal risks for union, nonunion, and female, and hour-based union workers increase when controlling for the local area unemployment, supporting a negative impact of unemployment on CWDs. Results show that, except for the employment-based male sample, the CWDs for union and male samples are larger than those for the nonunion and female samples. The endogeneity corrected results from the 2SLS confirm that workers receive the CWDs for their exposure to workplace-related fatal risks. However, results find no evidence of the effects of local area unemployment on the CWDs. The estimated values of a statistical life (VSL) of about $4.69 million to $31.79 million derived from OLS estimates are slightly above the estimates reported in the literature. These results are particularly important as an unbiased estimate of the CWD leads to the precise calculation of the VSL. The findings from this study would help policymakers understand the implication behind wage-fatality risk tradeoff in the workplace. The estimates of the VSL would allow them to design policies aimed at reducing workplace-related fatal injury risk and improving the worker's compensation system.
补偿工作场所风险和地方失业的工资差异:美国性别、工会和非工会工人的新证据
摘要:本研究在控制地方失业对风险溢价影响的基础上,估算了工伤致死性工资补偿差异(CWDs)。主要论点是,在高失业率地区,由于工人的议价能力减弱,具有致命伤害风险的职业中的工人可能无法获得与工作有关的伤害的全额补偿。使用普通最小二乘(OLS)和两阶段最小二乘(2SLS)方法,采用基于就业和基于工时的伤害风险两种风险度量来估计不同工作风险对CWDs的影响。风险度量是根据2012-2016年期间的当前人口调查(CPS)和劳工统计局(BLS)数据构建的。致命伤害风险数据包括白人和蓝领职业的性别和工会成员身份,以更准确地估计CWDs。OLS估计大体上支持CWD理论。在控制当地失业率的情况下,工会、非工会、女性和以小时为基础的工会工人基于就业的致命风险的CWDs增加,支持失业对CWDs的负面影响。结果表明,除了以就业为基础的男性样本外,工会和男性样本的CWDs大于非工会和女性样本的CWDs。2SLS的内生性校正结果证实,工人因暴露于与工作场所相关的致命风险而获得CWDs。然而,结果没有发现当地失业对CWDs影响的证据。从生命线行动估计数得出的统计寿命估计数约为469万至3179万美元,略高于文献中报告的估计数。这些结果特别重要,因为对CWD的无偏估计可以精确计算VSL。这项研究的发现将有助于政策制定者理解工作场所工资与死亡风险权衡背后的含义。VSL的估计将使他们能够设计旨在减少与工作场所有关的致命伤害风险和改善工人赔偿制度的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信