Dentistry and national health insurance.

Current opinion in dentistry Pub Date : 1992-09-01
M H Schoen
{"title":"Dentistry and national health insurance.","authors":"M H Schoen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to dental care is not equitable in the United States. The dental health of the population varies widely by socioeconomic status. Private dental insurance coverage has peaked at about 40% of the population, and benefits are variable. Dentistry is not included in Medicare and is optional for adults under Medicaid. Inflation is greater than for all goods and services. There is considerable administrative waste, and quality is variable. In this author's opinion, only a national system with universal coverage, one set of benefits, a single payer, a cap on expenditures, and no participation by insurance companies that is increasingly based on salaried consumer-or community-owned group practices with dentist input into decision making can hope to solve the existing problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"2 ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to dental care is not equitable in the United States. The dental health of the population varies widely by socioeconomic status. Private dental insurance coverage has peaked at about 40% of the population, and benefits are variable. Dentistry is not included in Medicare and is optional for adults under Medicaid. Inflation is greater than for all goods and services. There is considerable administrative waste, and quality is variable. In this author's opinion, only a national system with universal coverage, one set of benefits, a single payer, a cap on expenditures, and no participation by insurance companies that is increasingly based on salaried consumer-or community-owned group practices with dentist input into decision making can hope to solve the existing problems.

牙科和国家健康保险。
在美国,获得牙科护理是不公平的。人口的牙齿健康因社会经济地位的不同而差别很大。私人牙科保险的覆盖范围达到顶峰,约占人口的40%,而且福利是可变的。牙科不包括在医疗保险中,对于医疗补助计划的成年人来说是可选的。通货膨胀高于所有商品和服务。存在相当大的行政浪费,质量参差不齐。在笔者看来,只有一个全民覆盖、一套福利、单一付款人、支出上限、保险公司不参与、越来越多地以受薪消费者或社区拥有的团体实践为基础、牙医参与决策的国家体系,才有希望解决现有的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信