Assessment of Private Health Sector in China

Jianmin Gao, Jun Xu
{"title":"Assessment of Private Health Sector in China","authors":"Jianmin Gao, Jun Xu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1579846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the reform and development of the health service system, China now is Facing a shortage of medical services. A policy that permitted qualified medical professionals to engage in private practice was issued by the state government in 1980, and reconfirmed and detailed in later years. Public-private partnerships become the new target for Chinese government and researching institutes. Private Health Sectors have there competition advantage in a certain aspect, according to the features of their ownership system. Although the development of private practice was already a fact, debates related to whether government should ban privatization and limit the scale of private practice have never stopped. Arguments in favors of private practices were that the development of the private health sector could improve access to health services, and that efficiency and quality could be improved by introducing competition into the health care market. The way of assessment private sector is the key for study on Public-private partnerships in China. There is no uniform methodology for measuring quality of health care. The method commonly used is to measure respectively three quality dimensions: structure, process and outcome. Four indicators that are observable and measurable were selected for measuring clinic quality. These indicators are quality of health workers, amount of medical equipment, working conditions, and clinic supervisors’ evaluation. Since village clinics are very small health units with one to two health workers and limited medical technology and equipment, to a large extent the quality of the health workers will determine the quality of the services provided. The four indicators were measured for each type of clinic and then compared between clinic groups. This paper is mainly study on the assessment means of Private Health Sectors. Building information systems around Private Health Sectors was the hardest work for assessment research. This paper tries to make a point on how to avoid this problem, and do well assessment work.","PeriodicalId":307125,"journal":{"name":"Institutional & Transition Economics Policy Paper Series","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutional & Transition Economics Policy Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1579846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the reform and development of the health service system, China now is Facing a shortage of medical services. A policy that permitted qualified medical professionals to engage in private practice was issued by the state government in 1980, and reconfirmed and detailed in later years. Public-private partnerships become the new target for Chinese government and researching institutes. Private Health Sectors have there competition advantage in a certain aspect, according to the features of their ownership system. Although the development of private practice was already a fact, debates related to whether government should ban privatization and limit the scale of private practice have never stopped. Arguments in favors of private practices were that the development of the private health sector could improve access to health services, and that efficiency and quality could be improved by introducing competition into the health care market. The way of assessment private sector is the key for study on Public-private partnerships in China. There is no uniform methodology for measuring quality of health care. The method commonly used is to measure respectively three quality dimensions: structure, process and outcome. Four indicators that are observable and measurable were selected for measuring clinic quality. These indicators are quality of health workers, amount of medical equipment, working conditions, and clinic supervisors’ evaluation. Since village clinics are very small health units with one to two health workers and limited medical technology and equipment, to a large extent the quality of the health workers will determine the quality of the services provided. The four indicators were measured for each type of clinic and then compared between clinic groups. This paper is mainly study on the assessment means of Private Health Sectors. Building information systems around Private Health Sectors was the hardest work for assessment research. This paper tries to make a point on how to avoid this problem, and do well assessment work.
中国民营卫生部门评估
随着卫生服务体制的改革和发展,中国目前面临着医疗服务短缺的问题。1980年,州政府颁布了一项政策,允许合格的医疗专业人员从事私人执业,并在后来的几年里得到了重申和详细说明。公私合作成为中国政府和研究机构的新目标。民营卫生部门根据其所有制的特点,在一定程度上具有竞争优势。虽然私人执业的发展已经是一个事实,但有关政府是否应该禁止私有化和限制私人执业规模的争论从未停止过。赞成私人执业的理由是,发展私营保健部门可以改善获得保健服务的机会,而且可以通过在保健市场引入竞争来提高效率和质量。私营部门的评估方式是研究中国公私伙伴关系的关键。衡量卫生保健质量没有统一的方法。常用的方法是分别测量结构、过程和结果三个质量维度。选取4个可观察、可测量的指标来衡量临床质量。这些指标是卫生工作者的素质、医疗设备的数量、工作条件和诊所主管的评价。由于乡村诊所是非常小的保健单位,只有一到两名保健工作人员,医疗技术和设备有限,因此在很大程度上,保健工作人员的素质将决定所提供服务的质量。对各类型临床进行四项指标测量,并在临床组间进行比较。本文主要对民营卫生机构的评价方法进行研究。围绕私营卫生部门建立信息系统是评估研究中最困难的工作。本文试图就如何避免这一问题,做好评价工作提出一些看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信