A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease

Celina S. Liu, N. Herrmann, D. Gallagher, T. Rajji, A. Kiss, D. Vieira, K. Lanctôt
{"title":"A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease","authors":"Celina S. Liu, N. Herrmann, D. Gallagher, T. Rajji, A. Kiss, D. Vieira, K. Lanctôt","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective While transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can enhance aspects of memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD), there has been wide variability in both the placement of tDCS electrodes and treatment response. This study compared the effects of bifrontal (anodal stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices), bitemporal (anodal stimulation over the temporal cortices), and sham tDCS on cognitive performance in MCI and AD. Methods Seventeen patients diagnosed with MCI or mild AD received 3 sessions of anodal tDCS (bifrontal, bitemporal, 2 mA for 20 minutes; and sham) in random order. Sessions were separated by 1 week. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Word Recognition Task, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Word Recall Task, 2-back, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used to assess cognition. Results There was a significant effect of stimulation condition on 2-back accuracy (F2,28 = 5.28 P = 0.01, η2p = 0.27), with greater improvements following bitemporal tDCS compared with both bifrontal and sham stimulations. There were no significant changes on other outcome measures following any stimulation. Adverse effects from stimulation were mild and temporary. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that improvements in specific memory tasks can be safely achieved after a single session of bitemporal tDCS in MCI and mild AD patients.","PeriodicalId":287576,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ECT","volume":"350 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ECT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objective While transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can enhance aspects of memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD), there has been wide variability in both the placement of tDCS electrodes and treatment response. This study compared the effects of bifrontal (anodal stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices), bitemporal (anodal stimulation over the temporal cortices), and sham tDCS on cognitive performance in MCI and AD. Methods Seventeen patients diagnosed with MCI or mild AD received 3 sessions of anodal tDCS (bifrontal, bitemporal, 2 mA for 20 minutes; and sham) in random order. Sessions were separated by 1 week. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Word Recognition Task, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Word Recall Task, 2-back, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used to assess cognition. Results There was a significant effect of stimulation condition on 2-back accuracy (F2,28 = 5.28 P = 0.01, η2p = 0.27), with greater improvements following bitemporal tDCS compared with both bifrontal and sham stimulations. There were no significant changes on other outcome measures following any stimulation. Adverse effects from stimulation were mild and temporary. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that improvements in specific memory tasks can be safely achieved after a single session of bitemporal tDCS in MCI and mild AD patients.
比较双额叶与双颞叶经颅直流电刺激对轻度认知障碍和轻度阿尔茨海默病的影响的初步研究
虽然经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可以增强轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的记忆功能,但tDCS电极的放置和治疗反应存在很大差异。本研究比较了双额(在背外侧前额叶皮层上的阳极刺激)、双颞叶(在颞叶皮层上的阳极刺激)和假tDCS对MCI和AD患者认知表现的影响。方法17例诊断为轻度认知障碍或轻度AD的患者接受3次淋巴结tDCS(双额、双颞、2 mA,持续20分钟;和假)随机顺序。每个疗程间隔1周。采用阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知词识别任务、阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知词回忆任务、2-back和蒙特利尔认知评估来评估认知。结果刺激条件对双背准确度有显著影响(F2,28 = 5.28, P = 0.01, η2p = 0.27),双颞叶tDCS比双额叶和假刺激有更大的改善。在任何刺激后,其他结果测量没有显著变化。刺激的副作用是轻微和暂时的。这些研究结果表明,在MCI和轻度AD患者中,单次双颞叶tDCS可以安全地改善特定记忆任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信