ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW OF NEW APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF HISTORICAL REALITY

Y. Dobrolyubska
{"title":"ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW OF NEW APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF HISTORICAL REALITY","authors":"Y. Dobrolyubska","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-173-5/53-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Within the post-neoclassical subsystem of the philosophy of history, new approaches to the study of historical reality have emerged. Attention should be paid to analyzing the possibilities of applying synergistic concepts in the philosophy of history, as well as to attempts to construct theories of local civilizations in the context of globalization. Much attention is paid to the ideas and methods of synergetics, which offers a new perspective on the nature of the integrity of historical reality and allows one to study historical structures and processes in alternative situations of transition from chaos to order. Also, the post-neoclassical philosophy of history offers a synthetic concept of local civilizations in the context of their global interaction, which takes into account both the tendency for globalization and the tendency for localization. In the context of this understanding of civilization, it is recognized that in the modern world, on the one hand, there is a process of globalization, and on the other – the importance of civilizational differences. Universal idioms and meanings are perceived and understood by people through the civilizing prism of their historical experience, which contrasts with the “semiotic imperialism” of global culture.","PeriodicalId":203453,"journal":{"name":"MODERN PHILOSOPHY IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN PHILOSOPHY IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-173-5/53-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Within the post-neoclassical subsystem of the philosophy of history, new approaches to the study of historical reality have emerged. Attention should be paid to analyzing the possibilities of applying synergistic concepts in the philosophy of history, as well as to attempts to construct theories of local civilizations in the context of globalization. Much attention is paid to the ideas and methods of synergetics, which offers a new perspective on the nature of the integrity of historical reality and allows one to study historical structures and processes in alternative situations of transition from chaos to order. Also, the post-neoclassical philosophy of history offers a synthetic concept of local civilizations in the context of their global interaction, which takes into account both the tendency for globalization and the tendency for localization. In the context of this understanding of civilization, it is recognized that in the modern world, on the one hand, there is a process of globalization, and on the other – the importance of civilizational differences. Universal idioms and meanings are perceived and understood by people through the civilizing prism of their historical experience, which contrasts with the “semiotic imperialism” of global culture.
历史现实研究新方法的分析概述
在历史哲学的后新古典子系统中,出现了研究历史现实的新方法。应注意分析在历史哲学中应用协同概念的可能性,以及在全球化背景下构建地方文明理论的尝试。我们非常关注协同学的思想和方法,它提供了一个关于历史现实完整性本质的新视角,并允许人们在从混乱到有序过渡的替代情况下研究历史结构和过程。此外,后新古典主义历史哲学提供了一种综合的地方文明概念,这种概念考虑了全球化趋势和本土化趋势。在这种对文明的理解的背景下,人们认识到,在现代世界中,一方面存在着全球化的进程,另一方面也存在着文明差异的重要性。人们通过历史经验的文明棱镜来感知和理解通用的习语和意义,这与全球文化的“符号帝国主义”形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信