Privacy Protection of Public Figures in China—The Case of Yundi Li’s Prostitution

Yanbing Wang
{"title":"Privacy Protection of Public Figures in China—The Case of Yundi Li’s Prostitution","authors":"Yanbing Wang","doi":"10.56397/slj.2023.06.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the birth of the right to privacy, more and more attention has been paid to the protection of the right to privacy. In China, since the introduction of privacy rights from the West, the protection of privacy rights has been focused on civil law, while the protection of privacy rights in legislation and judicial practice in other branches of law has only been superficial but not in-depth. The effect of civil law on the protection of privacy rights is undeniable, especially after the introduction of the Civil Code, which provides more thorough and complete regulations on privacy rights in the field of civil law. However, with the development of society, relying on civil law alone to protect the right to privacy has become a challenge. The protection of the right to privacy of public figures is even more lacking. For example, the case of Li Yundi’s prostitution, which was publicly reported by the Beijing Chaoyang Public Security Bureau on 21 October 2021, reveals the loopholes in the protection of privacy and the privacy of public figures in China. Firstly, civil law in China has been effective in protecting the right to privacy, but in this case, the right of public security to disclose Li Yundi’s private life involves the infringement of citizens’ privacy by public power. Secondly, in China, public figures are often involved in the public interest, and it is the consensus of the academia and society as a whole that anyone in conflict with the public interest should give way to the public interest. However, in judicial practice, the author believes that it is unfair to treat public figures and ordinary citizens differently in terms of privacy rights when the public interest is not seriously endangered. Therefore, this article aims to analyse the current status and shortcomings of the legislation and judicial practice on the protection of the privacy of public figures in China on the basis of the right to privacy and the privacy of public figures, and to draw on the advanced experience of other countries in order to establish and improve the privacy protection mechanism of public figures in China.","PeriodicalId":377631,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Law and Justice","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Law and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2023.06.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the birth of the right to privacy, more and more attention has been paid to the protection of the right to privacy. In China, since the introduction of privacy rights from the West, the protection of privacy rights has been focused on civil law, while the protection of privacy rights in legislation and judicial practice in other branches of law has only been superficial but not in-depth. The effect of civil law on the protection of privacy rights is undeniable, especially after the introduction of the Civil Code, which provides more thorough and complete regulations on privacy rights in the field of civil law. However, with the development of society, relying on civil law alone to protect the right to privacy has become a challenge. The protection of the right to privacy of public figures is even more lacking. For example, the case of Li Yundi’s prostitution, which was publicly reported by the Beijing Chaoyang Public Security Bureau on 21 October 2021, reveals the loopholes in the protection of privacy and the privacy of public figures in China. Firstly, civil law in China has been effective in protecting the right to privacy, but in this case, the right of public security to disclose Li Yundi’s private life involves the infringement of citizens’ privacy by public power. Secondly, in China, public figures are often involved in the public interest, and it is the consensus of the academia and society as a whole that anyone in conflict with the public interest should give way to the public interest. However, in judicial practice, the author believes that it is unfair to treat public figures and ordinary citizens differently in terms of privacy rights when the public interest is not seriously endangered. Therefore, this article aims to analyse the current status and shortcomings of the legislation and judicial practice on the protection of the privacy of public figures in China on the basis of the right to privacy and the privacy of public figures, and to draw on the advanced experience of other countries in order to establish and improve the privacy protection mechanism of public figures in China.
中国公众人物的隐私保护——李云迪卖淫案
自隐私权诞生以来,隐私权的保护越来越受到人们的重视。在中国,自西方引入隐私权以来,对隐私权的保护主要集中在民法上,而其他法律部门在立法和司法实践中对隐私权的保护只是肤浅而不深入。民法在隐私权保护方面的作用是不可否认的,特别是在《民法典》出台后,民法领域对隐私权的规定更加深入和完善。然而,随着社会的发展,仅仅依靠民法来保护隐私权已成为一项挑战。对公众人物隐私权的保护更是缺乏。例如,北京市朝阳区公安局于2021年10月21日公开举报的李云迪嫖娼案,暴露了中国在隐私保护和公众人物隐私保护方面的漏洞。首先,中国民法对隐私权的保护是有效的,但在本案中,公安对李云迪私生活的披露权涉及公权力对公民隐私权的侵犯。其次,在中国,公众人物经常涉及公共利益,任何与公共利益相冲突的人都应该让位于公共利益,这是学术界和整个社会的共识。然而,在司法实践中,笔者认为在公共利益没有受到严重危害的情况下,将公众人物与普通公民在隐私权方面区别对待是不公平的。因此,本文旨在以隐私权和公众人物隐私权为基础,分析中国公众人物隐私权保护立法和司法实践的现状和不足,并借鉴其他国家的先进经验,以期建立和完善中国公众人物隐私权保护机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信