Simulated Performance of TFRC, DCCP, SCTP, and UDP Protocols Over Wired Networks

D. Kanellopoulos, Ali H. Wheeb
{"title":"Simulated Performance of TFRC, DCCP, SCTP, and UDP Protocols Over Wired Networks","authors":"D. Kanellopoulos, Ali H. Wheeb","doi":"10.4018/ijitn.2020100107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multimedia applications impose different QoS requirements (e.g., bounded end-to-end delay and jitter) and need an enhanced transport layer protocol that should handle packet loss, minimize errors, manage network congestion, and transmit efficiently. Across an IP network, the transport layer protocol provides data transmission and affects the QoS provided to the application on hand. The most common transport layer protocols used by Internet applications are TCP and UDP. There are also advanced transport layer protocols such as DCCP and TFRC. The authors evaluated the performance of UDP, DCCP, SCTP, and TFRC over wired networks for three traffic flows: data transmission, video streaming, and voice over IP. The evaluation criteria were throughput, end-to-end delay, and packet loss ratio. They compared their performance to learn in which traffic flow/service each of these protocols functions better than the others. The throughput of SCTP and TFRC is better than UDP. DCCP is superior to SCTP and TFRC in terms of end-to-end delay. SCTP is suitable for Internet applications that require high bandwidth.","PeriodicalId":120331,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Interdiscip. Telecommun. Netw.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Interdiscip. Telecommun. Netw.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijitn.2020100107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Multimedia applications impose different QoS requirements (e.g., bounded end-to-end delay and jitter) and need an enhanced transport layer protocol that should handle packet loss, minimize errors, manage network congestion, and transmit efficiently. Across an IP network, the transport layer protocol provides data transmission and affects the QoS provided to the application on hand. The most common transport layer protocols used by Internet applications are TCP and UDP. There are also advanced transport layer protocols such as DCCP and TFRC. The authors evaluated the performance of UDP, DCCP, SCTP, and TFRC over wired networks for three traffic flows: data transmission, video streaming, and voice over IP. The evaluation criteria were throughput, end-to-end delay, and packet loss ratio. They compared their performance to learn in which traffic flow/service each of these protocols functions better than the others. The throughput of SCTP and TFRC is better than UDP. DCCP is superior to SCTP and TFRC in terms of end-to-end delay. SCTP is suitable for Internet applications that require high bandwidth.
有线网络中TFRC、DCCP、SCTP和UDP协议的仿真性能
多媒体应用施加了不同的QoS要求(例如,有界的端到端延迟和抖动),并且需要一个增强的传输层协议来处理数据包丢失、最小化错误、管理网络拥塞和有效传输。在IP网络中,传输层协议提供数据传输,并影响提供给应用程序的QoS。Internet应用程序使用的最常见的传输层协议是TCP和UDP。还有一些高级的传输层协议,如DCCP和TFRC。作者评估了有线网络上UDP、DCCP、SCTP和TFRC在三种流量流(数据传输、视频流和IP语音)下的性能。评估标准是吞吐量、端到端延迟和丢包率。他们比较了它们的性能,以了解这些协议中哪个流量/服务比其他协议更好。SCTP和TFRC的吞吐量优于UDP。DCCP在端到端延迟方面优于SCTP和TFRC。SCTP适用于对带宽要求较高的Internet应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信