{"title":"Intra-Operative Complic atio n of Lumbar Kyphoplasty Instrumentatio n\nin Non-Osteoporotic Patients with Compression Fractures","authors":"Calvin R. Chen","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2018/2/221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vertebral augmentation is a\nsurgical procedure used to stabilize fractured\nvertebrae and reduce pain in patients with compression\nfractures. When intra-operative and\npost-operative complications do occur, they can\nhave dire consequences. Some of the common\nrisks associated with kyphoplasty are worsening\nof the fracture, infections, spinal cord compression,\netc. Typically, we do not consider the risk\nof instrumentation failure.\nObjectives: In 2 cases, we describe patients\nwho has undergone kyphoplasties with live\nfluoroscopic guidance. Both procedures used\na unipedicular approach and the CareFusion\nsystem (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).\nThe CareFusion AVAFlex curved augmentation\nneedle was used, and intra-operatively the\nhandle broke off at the neck making it difficult\nto remove the cannula and curved needle. To\nremove the system, an Arthrex Reamer (Arthrex\nInc., Naples, NY).was used with Chuck Key (Arthrex\nInc., Naples, NY).\nStudy Design: Case report.\nSetting: Outpatient Interventional Pain Clinic.\nMethods: The vertebral body was accessed with\nan AVAFlex curved needle, a CareFusion AVAMax\nvertebral balloon, and Cement injection with\npolymethylmethacrylate, were used. The removal\nof the AVAFlex cannula was attempted with a gripping\nand pulling motion of the blue handle on the\ncannula, which resulted in the handle breaking at\nthe most distal portion of the cannula. The cannula\nwas then removed using the Arthrex Reamer with\nChuck Key. The entire cannula was successfully\nremoved from the vertebral body after cement had\nbeen delivered.\nResults: The density of bone tissue in a traumatic\ncompression fracture of a nonosteoporotic individual\nwill be higher and less porous when placing\nthe needle and cannulas. Also, it is important to\nhave an understanding of the different instruments\nthat are available in the operative setting.\nLimitations: Small sample size.\nConclusion: Instrumentation experience, understanding\nhow to handle instrument failures, bone\nhealth of the patient, and the history of mechanism\nfor compression fracture should all be considered\nwhen performing kyphoplasty.\nKey words: Kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, compression\nfracture, instrumentation failure","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2018/2/221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vertebral augmentation is a
surgical procedure used to stabilize fractured
vertebrae and reduce pain in patients with compression
fractures. When intra-operative and
post-operative complications do occur, they can
have dire consequences. Some of the common
risks associated with kyphoplasty are worsening
of the fracture, infections, spinal cord compression,
etc. Typically, we do not consider the risk
of instrumentation failure.
Objectives: In 2 cases, we describe patients
who has undergone kyphoplasties with live
fluoroscopic guidance. Both procedures used
a unipedicular approach and the CareFusion
system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
The CareFusion AVAFlex curved augmentation
needle was used, and intra-operatively the
handle broke off at the neck making it difficult
to remove the cannula and curved needle. To
remove the system, an Arthrex Reamer (Arthrex
Inc., Naples, NY).was used with Chuck Key (Arthrex
Inc., Naples, NY).
Study Design: Case report.
Setting: Outpatient Interventional Pain Clinic.
Methods: The vertebral body was accessed with
an AVAFlex curved needle, a CareFusion AVAMax
vertebral balloon, and Cement injection with
polymethylmethacrylate, were used. The removal
of the AVAFlex cannula was attempted with a gripping
and pulling motion of the blue handle on the
cannula, which resulted in the handle breaking at
the most distal portion of the cannula. The cannula
was then removed using the Arthrex Reamer with
Chuck Key. The entire cannula was successfully
removed from the vertebral body after cement had
been delivered.
Results: The density of bone tissue in a traumatic
compression fracture of a nonosteoporotic individual
will be higher and less porous when placing
the needle and cannulas. Also, it is important to
have an understanding of the different instruments
that are available in the operative setting.
Limitations: Small sample size.
Conclusion: Instrumentation experience, understanding
how to handle instrument failures, bone
health of the patient, and the history of mechanism
for compression fracture should all be considered
when performing kyphoplasty.
Key words: Kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, compression
fracture, instrumentation failure