Preliminary Causal Discovery Results with Software Effort Estimation Data

Anandi Hira, B. Boehm, R. Stoddard, M. Konrad
{"title":"Preliminary Causal Discovery Results with Software Effort Estimation Data","authors":"Anandi Hira, B. Boehm, R. Stoddard, M. Konrad","doi":"10.1145/3172871.3172876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correlation does not imply causation. Though this is a well-known fact, most analyses depend on correlation as proof of relationships that are often treated as causal. Causal discovery, also referred to as causal model search, involves the application of statistical methods to identify causal relationships from conditional independences (and/or other statistical relationships) in the data. Though software cost estimation models use both domain knowledge and statistics, to date, there has yet to be a published report describing the evaluation of a software dataset using causal discovery. Two of the authors have previously used regression analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the International Function Points User Group (IFPUG)'s and the Common Software Measurement International Consortium (COSMIC)'s functional size measurement methods for analyzing the Unified Code Count (UCC)1's dataset of maintenance tasks. Using the same dataset, the authors will report in this paper on what types of information causal discovery provides, and how they differ from correlation tests. This paper will introduce causal discovery to software engineering research, and its use in the future may impact how software effort models are built.","PeriodicalId":199550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3172871.3172876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Correlation does not imply causation. Though this is a well-known fact, most analyses depend on correlation as proof of relationships that are often treated as causal. Causal discovery, also referred to as causal model search, involves the application of statistical methods to identify causal relationships from conditional independences (and/or other statistical relationships) in the data. Though software cost estimation models use both domain knowledge and statistics, to date, there has yet to be a published report describing the evaluation of a software dataset using causal discovery. Two of the authors have previously used regression analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the International Function Points User Group (IFPUG)'s and the Common Software Measurement International Consortium (COSMIC)'s functional size measurement methods for analyzing the Unified Code Count (UCC)1's dataset of maintenance tasks. Using the same dataset, the authors will report in this paper on what types of information causal discovery provides, and how they differ from correlation tests. This paper will introduce causal discovery to software engineering research, and its use in the future may impact how software effort models are built.
基于软件工作量估算数据的初步因果发现结果
相关性并不意味着因果关系。虽然这是一个众所周知的事实,但大多数分析依赖于相关性作为通常被视为因果关系的关系的证明。因果发现,也称为因果模型搜索,涉及应用统计方法从数据中的条件独立性(和/或其他统计关系)中识别因果关系。虽然软件成本估算模型同时使用领域知识和统计数据,但到目前为止,还没有一篇发表的报告描述了使用因果发现对软件数据集的评估。两位作者先前使用回归分析来评估国际功能点用户组(IFPUG)和通用软件测量国际联盟(COSMIC)的功能大小测量方法的有效性,以分析统一代码计数(UCC)1的维护任务数据集。使用相同的数据集,作者将在论文中报告因果发现提供的信息类型,以及它们与相关测试的区别。本文将向软件工程研究介绍因果发现,它在未来的使用可能会影响如何构建软件工作模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信