Experimental Design and Modeling for Propylene Oxide - CO2 - Poly (Propylene Carbonate) Solutions

U. Pandey, K. A. Sætre, Jostein Mathiassen, Sara Ronasi, S. Fredriksen, C. Pfeiffer
{"title":"Experimental Design and Modeling for Propylene Oxide - CO2 - Poly (Propylene Carbonate) Solutions","authors":"U. Pandey, K. A. Sætre, Jostein Mathiassen, Sara Ronasi, S. Fredriksen, C. Pfeiffer","doi":"10.3384/ECP1815373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, experimental design was used to formulate the empirical models of viscosity and density of poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC), propylene oxide (PO), and carbon dioxide (CO2) solutions by designing experiments at key values of the process variables; concentration of PPC between 0 to 34% (% w/w), temperature in the reactor between 50 to 75°C, and gas phase manometric CO2 pressure between 20 to 40 bar. A bench scale reactor (2000 ml) comprising an external circulation loop equipped with in-line viscosity and density measurement devices was used to carry out the tests. The results show that the equilibrium viscosity and density of the solution increased with the concentration of PPC and decreased with the pressure and temperature in the reactor. The density model has Radjusted 2 value close to unity indicating that the model can predict the variation in the density with very high accuracy. In comparison, the viscosity model has a lower Radjusted 2 value indicating a need for additional experiments to improve the model. However, both empirical models predict the general trends of the density and viscosity characteristics in the selected range and can be used as a viable alternative to thermodynamic models.","PeriodicalId":350464,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 59th Conference on imulation and Modelling (SIMS 59), 26-28 September 2018, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 59th Conference on imulation and Modelling (SIMS 59), 26-28 September 2018, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/ECP1815373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research, experimental design was used to formulate the empirical models of viscosity and density of poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC), propylene oxide (PO), and carbon dioxide (CO2) solutions by designing experiments at key values of the process variables; concentration of PPC between 0 to 34% (% w/w), temperature in the reactor between 50 to 75°C, and gas phase manometric CO2 pressure between 20 to 40 bar. A bench scale reactor (2000 ml) comprising an external circulation loop equipped with in-line viscosity and density measurement devices was used to carry out the tests. The results show that the equilibrium viscosity and density of the solution increased with the concentration of PPC and decreased with the pressure and temperature in the reactor. The density model has Radjusted 2 value close to unity indicating that the model can predict the variation in the density with very high accuracy. In comparison, the viscosity model has a lower Radjusted 2 value indicating a need for additional experiments to improve the model. However, both empirical models predict the general trends of the density and viscosity characteristics in the selected range and can be used as a viable alternative to thermodynamic models.
环氧丙烷-二氧化碳-聚(碳酸丙烯酯)溶液的实验设计与建模
本研究采用实验设计的方法,通过对工艺变量的关键值进行实验设计,建立了聚碳酸丙烯酯(PPC)、环氧丙烷(PO)和二氧化碳(CO2)溶液粘度和密度的经验模型;PPC浓度在0 ~ 34% (% w/w)之间,反应器温度在50 ~ 75℃之间,气相测压CO2压力在20 ~ 40 bar之间。一个实验规模的反应器(2000毫升),包括一个外部循环回路,配备了在线粘度和密度测量装置,用于进行测试。结果表明,溶液的平衡粘度和平衡密度随PPC浓度的增加而增加,随反应器内压力和温度的升高而降低。密度模型的Radjusted 2值接近于1,表明该模型可以非常准确地预测密度的变化。相比之下,粘度模型的Radjusted 2值较低,表明需要进行额外的实验来改进模型。然而,这两种经验模型都预测了在所选范围内密度和粘度特性的一般趋势,可以作为热力学模型的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信