{"title":"[Identification of enteric bacteria using the ENTEROtest 1 and 2 and the ENTERO-Rapid systems].","authors":"I Sedlácek, E Pakrová","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The identification efficacy of two systems, ENTEROtest 1 & 2 and ENTERO-Rapid (fy. Lachema a. c., Brno), was compared. A total 123 well known strains of enteric bacteria were tested. The ENTEROtest 1 & 2 system correctly identified 87.0% tested strains to the species level, the ENTERO-Rapid system correctly identified 76.4% of these strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":75687,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","volume":"41 3","pages":"145-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The identification efficacy of two systems, ENTEROtest 1 & 2 and ENTERO-Rapid (fy. Lachema a. c., Brno), was compared. A total 123 well known strains of enteric bacteria were tested. The ENTEROtest 1 & 2 system correctly identified 87.0% tested strains to the species level, the ENTERO-Rapid system correctly identified 76.4% of these strains.