[Stability of body composition in boys and girls 12 through 15 years of age].

K Watanabe, F Nakadomo, M Miyake, K Tanaka, K Maeda
{"title":"[Stability of body composition in boys and girls 12 through 15 years of age].","authors":"K Watanabe,&nbsp;F Nakadomo,&nbsp;M Miyake,&nbsp;K Tanaka,&nbsp;K Maeda","doi":"10.2114/ahs1983.11.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although underwater weighing has been regarded as a representative of the criterion reference methods for determining body composition, this technique is cumbersome for screening. The purpose of the present study was to examine the stability of body composition assessed not only by underwater weighting but also by existing bioelectrical impedance equations and skinfold thickness equations during a 4-week period. Ten male and 10 female junior high school pupils, aged 12 to 15 years, volunteered to serve as subjects. Body density (Db) was estimated by underwater weighing (UW), skinfold thickness (ST) method, and bioelectrical impedance (BI) method. The UW was considered criterion reference method. The underwater weight was the heaviest value that was reproduced twice at least among 5 to 10 measurements. Residual lung volume was estimated \"in water,\" with the subject in the sitting position, by a closed-circuit helium-dilution method. The ST equations used for determination of Db were those developed by Nagamine et al., while in the BI method equations proposed by Nakadomo et al. were applied. The Db for boys by UW did not differ significantly during the 4-week period; however, in girls it was significantly lower in the 2nd test (1.0479 +/- 0.018 g/ml) than in the 1st test (1.0500 +/- 0.019 g/ml). Likewise, the Db estimated by ST and BI methods remained unchanged in boys, while in girls it was significantly lower in the 2nd test (BI: 1.0445 +/- 0.010 vs. 1.0389 +/- 0.013 g/ml). Test-retest reliability of all the three methods for measurements conducted 4 weeks apart were statistically significant (e.g. UW: r = 0.99, ST: r = 0.94, BI: r = 0.89 in girls). In conclusion, the validity of Db estimated by these two methods was found to be insufficient when absolute values are required. However, body composition estimates assessed by ST and BI methods for boys and girls may be stable on a relative basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":77409,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi","volume":"11 4","pages":"409-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2114/ahs1983.11.409","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2114/ahs1983.11.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although underwater weighing has been regarded as a representative of the criterion reference methods for determining body composition, this technique is cumbersome for screening. The purpose of the present study was to examine the stability of body composition assessed not only by underwater weighting but also by existing bioelectrical impedance equations and skinfold thickness equations during a 4-week period. Ten male and 10 female junior high school pupils, aged 12 to 15 years, volunteered to serve as subjects. Body density (Db) was estimated by underwater weighing (UW), skinfold thickness (ST) method, and bioelectrical impedance (BI) method. The UW was considered criterion reference method. The underwater weight was the heaviest value that was reproduced twice at least among 5 to 10 measurements. Residual lung volume was estimated "in water," with the subject in the sitting position, by a closed-circuit helium-dilution method. The ST equations used for determination of Db were those developed by Nagamine et al., while in the BI method equations proposed by Nakadomo et al. were applied. The Db for boys by UW did not differ significantly during the 4-week period; however, in girls it was significantly lower in the 2nd test (1.0479 +/- 0.018 g/ml) than in the 1st test (1.0500 +/- 0.019 g/ml). Likewise, the Db estimated by ST and BI methods remained unchanged in boys, while in girls it was significantly lower in the 2nd test (BI: 1.0445 +/- 0.010 vs. 1.0389 +/- 0.013 g/ml). Test-retest reliability of all the three methods for measurements conducted 4 weeks apart were statistically significant (e.g. UW: r = 0.99, ST: r = 0.94, BI: r = 0.89 in girls). In conclusion, the validity of Db estimated by these two methods was found to be insufficient when absolute values are required. However, body composition estimates assessed by ST and BI methods for boys and girls may be stable on a relative basis.

[12 - 15岁男孩和女孩身体成分的稳定性]。
虽然水下称重已被认为是确定身体成分的标准参考方法的代表,但这种技术筛选起来很麻烦。本研究的目的是在为期4周的时间内,通过水下称重以及现有的生物电阻抗方程和皮褶厚度方程来评估身体成分的稳定性。12至15岁的初中学生,男10名,女10名,自愿作为研究对象。采用水下称重法(UW)、皮褶厚度法(ST)和生物电阻抗法(BI)估算体密度(Db)。UW被认为是标准参考方法。水下重量是在5到10次测量中至少再现两次的最重值。在受试者坐着的情况下,通过闭路氦稀释法“在水中”估计残余肺容量。用于测定Db的ST方程为Nagamine等人开发的方程,而BI方法中采用Nakadomo等人提出的方程。在4周的时间内,男生的Db没有显著差异;然而,在女孩中,第二次检测(1.0479 +/- 0.018 g/ml)明显低于第一次检测(1.0500 +/- 0.019 g/ml)。同样,ST和BI方法估计的Db在男孩中保持不变,而在女孩中,在第二次测试中显著降低(BI: 1.0445 +/- 0.010 vs 1.0389 +/- 0.013 g/ml)。三种测量方法间隔4周的重测信度均具有统计学意义(例如,女孩的UW: r = 0.99, ST: r = 0.94, BI: r = 0.89)。综上所述,当需要绝对值时,这两种方法估计的Db的有效性不足。然而,通过ST和BI方法评估的男孩和女孩的身体成分估计值可能相对稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书