Intra-articular osteotomies for medial compartment osteoarthritis: Is adding an extra-articular osteotomy worthwhile?

IF 0.3
A. Apte, R. Bhadiyadra, M. Chaudhary
{"title":"Intra-articular osteotomies for medial compartment osteoarthritis: Is adding an extra-articular osteotomy worthwhile?","authors":"A. Apte, R. Bhadiyadra, M. Chaudhary","doi":"10.4103/jllr.jllr_16_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Medial compartment osteoarthritis (MCOA) of the knee presents with varus deformity arising from the upper tibia or lower femur. High tibial osteotomies relieve pain by correcting the varus and improving the mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Closing wedge, opening wedge, and dome osteotomies are popular choices in the upper tibial metaphysis. These are all extra-articular osteotomies (EAO). Recently, attention has turned to detection and treatment of intra articular deformity arising from the knee to treat MCOA. Tibial condylar valgus osteotomy (TCVO) is an intra-articular osteotomy (IAO) which corrects the varus malalignment by elevating the medial tibial condyle and is usually fixed with a plate (Tibial condylar valgus osteotomy-plating [TCVO-P]). A second distal extra articular osteotomy, fixed with an Ilizarov fixator (tibial condylar valgus osteotomy-Ilizarov [TCVO-I]) is performed in some patients for better correction of the mechanical axis. The two groups were treated with different surgical approaches based on preoperative analysis of deformity. Hence this is a level IV study. We aimed to study the improvement in radiological parameters after TCVO in MCOA. We also compared the results between TCVO-P and TCVO-I. Patients and Methods: We performed 64 osteotomies in 55 patients over the last 7 years. 30 (33 tibiae) had a TCVO-P. 25 (31 tibiae) had a TCVO-I. The mean age in TCVO-P was 55 years, and in TCVO-I was 48 years. Results: The mean preoperative (bo) MAD was more in TCVO-I at –37.4% and improved to a mean postoperative MAD of 53.8%. TCVO-P had a lesser mean bo MAD of –7.4%, which corrected to 46.4%. MAD was better corrected by TCVO-I (P = 0.0058). Correction of medial proximal tibial angle, hip knee ankle angle, ankle joint line orientation improved significantly in both groups. The knee joint line orientation was improved by TCVO-I (P = 0.001), but not by TCVO-P (P = 0.075). Joint line convergence angle (JLCA), spine edge angle, and spine vertical distance were all significantly improved in both groups. Condylar plateau angle was not changed significantly in either group. Conclusion: TCVO is an Intra articular osteotomy which effectively corrects the varus deformity arising from the knee joint in MCOA. An isolated TCVO-P slightly under-corrects the mechanical axis. TCVO-I is better at restoring mechanical axis to beyond neutral and is better for younger patients and with intorsion deformities.","PeriodicalId":307806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jllr.jllr_16_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Medial compartment osteoarthritis (MCOA) of the knee presents with varus deformity arising from the upper tibia or lower femur. High tibial osteotomies relieve pain by correcting the varus and improving the mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Closing wedge, opening wedge, and dome osteotomies are popular choices in the upper tibial metaphysis. These are all extra-articular osteotomies (EAO). Recently, attention has turned to detection and treatment of intra articular deformity arising from the knee to treat MCOA. Tibial condylar valgus osteotomy (TCVO) is an intra-articular osteotomy (IAO) which corrects the varus malalignment by elevating the medial tibial condyle and is usually fixed with a plate (Tibial condylar valgus osteotomy-plating [TCVO-P]). A second distal extra articular osteotomy, fixed with an Ilizarov fixator (tibial condylar valgus osteotomy-Ilizarov [TCVO-I]) is performed in some patients for better correction of the mechanical axis. The two groups were treated with different surgical approaches based on preoperative analysis of deformity. Hence this is a level IV study. We aimed to study the improvement in radiological parameters after TCVO in MCOA. We also compared the results between TCVO-P and TCVO-I. Patients and Methods: We performed 64 osteotomies in 55 patients over the last 7 years. 30 (33 tibiae) had a TCVO-P. 25 (31 tibiae) had a TCVO-I. The mean age in TCVO-P was 55 years, and in TCVO-I was 48 years. Results: The mean preoperative (bo) MAD was more in TCVO-I at –37.4% and improved to a mean postoperative MAD of 53.8%. TCVO-P had a lesser mean bo MAD of –7.4%, which corrected to 46.4%. MAD was better corrected by TCVO-I (P = 0.0058). Correction of medial proximal tibial angle, hip knee ankle angle, ankle joint line orientation improved significantly in both groups. The knee joint line orientation was improved by TCVO-I (P = 0.001), but not by TCVO-P (P = 0.075). Joint line convergence angle (JLCA), spine edge angle, and spine vertical distance were all significantly improved in both groups. Condylar plateau angle was not changed significantly in either group. Conclusion: TCVO is an Intra articular osteotomy which effectively corrects the varus deformity arising from the knee joint in MCOA. An isolated TCVO-P slightly under-corrects the mechanical axis. TCVO-I is better at restoring mechanical axis to beyond neutral and is better for younger patients and with intorsion deformities.
内侧腔室骨关节炎的关节内截骨术:是否值得增加关节外截骨术?
背景和目的:膝关节内侧骨关节炎(MCOA)表现为胫骨上部或股骨下部的内翻畸形。高位胫骨截骨术通过纠正内翻和改善机械轴偏差(MAD)来缓解疼痛。闭合楔形、打开楔形和圆顶截骨术是胫骨上干骺端常用的术式。这些都是关节外截骨术(EAO)。最近,人们的注意力转向了检测和治疗由膝关节引起的关节内畸形来治疗MCOA。胫骨髁外翻截骨术(Tibial condylar valgus osteotomy, TCVO)是一种关节内截骨术(IAO),通过抬高胫骨内侧髁来矫正内翻错位,通常用钢板固定(胫骨髁外翻截骨钢板[TCVO- p])。为了更好地矫正机械轴,一些患者采用Ilizarov固定器(胫骨髁外翻截骨术-Ilizarov [tcvo - 1])进行第二次远端关节外截骨。根据术前畸形情况分析,两组采用不同手术入路治疗。因此,这是一个四级研究。我们的目的是研究TCVO后MCOA放射学参数的改善。我们还比较了TCVO-P和TCVO-I的结果。患者和方法:在过去的7年中,我们对55例患者进行了64例截骨手术。30例(33例胫骨)出现tvop。25例(31例胫骨)发生tvoi。TCVO-P组平均年龄55岁,TCVO-I组平均年龄48岁。结果:tvo - 1患者术前平均MAD为-37.4%,术后平均MAD为53.8%。tvo - p的平均bo - MAD较低,为-7.4%,修正后为46.4%。tvo - 1对MAD的矫正效果较好(P = 0.0058)。两组胫骨内侧近端角、髋膝踝关节角、踝关节线方向矫正均有明显改善。TCVO-I能改善膝关节线的定位(P = 0.001),而TCVO-P不能改善膝关节线的定位(P = 0.075)。两组患者关节线收敛角(JLCA)、脊柱边缘角、脊柱垂直距离均有明显改善。两组患者髁平台角均无明显变化。结论:TCVO是一种关节内截骨术,能有效矫正膝关节内翻畸形。一个孤立的tvo - p稍微低于机械轴的校正。tvo - 1能更好地将机械轴恢复到中性以上,更适合年轻患者和有内翻畸形的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书