Community representations of unconventional gas development in Australia, Canada and the United States, and their effect on social licence

Hanabeth Luke, D. Evensen
{"title":"Community representations of unconventional gas development in Australia, Canada and the United States, and their effect on social licence","authors":"Hanabeth Luke, D. Evensen","doi":"10.4324/9781315637280-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unconventional gas development provides a fascinating opportunity for better understanding how the intersection of local social structure and external industrial pressures shape rural landscapes. Previous research on social responses to unconventional gas development (UGD) explores motivations for supporting or opposing industry development. Research has revealed differing perceptions in areas where the UGD industry emerged early versus later on (or not at all). We take up the question of why systematic differences may exist between regions at different stages of development, integrating social representations theory with the concept of social licence to operate to explain differences in attitudes to UGD. \n \nBorn to social psychology, social representations theory describes how communities characterise concepts, ideas, or objects. Social representations underpin the development of community views, opinions, attitudes and behaviours, and are useful for understanding how communities respond to novel industrial developments (Deaux & Philogene, 2001; Evensen and Stedman, 2016; Moscovici, 2001). Social representations are collectively generated characterisations of an issue that are then internalised to various extents by individuals. ‘Social licence to operate’ is also a community-level attribute that has a mix of societal-level and individual-level antecedents. The concept of social licence to operate provides a frame for understanding community responses to industrial developments, upon which a spectrum of community views, opinions, attitudes and behaviours can be placed (Dare, Schirmer, & Vanclay, 2014; Luke, Lloyd, Boyd, & den Exter, 2014b; Thomson & Boutilier, 2011). Social representations could include portrayals of both the effects of UGD and of the UGD industry, each potentially shaping assessment of the extent to which social licence may exist or not.","PeriodicalId":144004,"journal":{"name":"Governing Shale Gas","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governing Shale Gas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637280-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Unconventional gas development provides a fascinating opportunity for better understanding how the intersection of local social structure and external industrial pressures shape rural landscapes. Previous research on social responses to unconventional gas development (UGD) explores motivations for supporting or opposing industry development. Research has revealed differing perceptions in areas where the UGD industry emerged early versus later on (or not at all). We take up the question of why systematic differences may exist between regions at different stages of development, integrating social representations theory with the concept of social licence to operate to explain differences in attitudes to UGD. Born to social psychology, social representations theory describes how communities characterise concepts, ideas, or objects. Social representations underpin the development of community views, opinions, attitudes and behaviours, and are useful for understanding how communities respond to novel industrial developments (Deaux & Philogene, 2001; Evensen and Stedman, 2016; Moscovici, 2001). Social representations are collectively generated characterisations of an issue that are then internalised to various extents by individuals. ‘Social licence to operate’ is also a community-level attribute that has a mix of societal-level and individual-level antecedents. The concept of social licence to operate provides a frame for understanding community responses to industrial developments, upon which a spectrum of community views, opinions, attitudes and behaviours can be placed (Dare, Schirmer, & Vanclay, 2014; Luke, Lloyd, Boyd, & den Exter, 2014b; Thomson & Boutilier, 2011). Social representations could include portrayals of both the effects of UGD and of the UGD industry, each potentially shaping assessment of the extent to which social licence may exist or not.
澳大利亚、加拿大和美国非常规天然气开发的社区代表及其对社会许可的影响
非常规天然气开发为更好地理解当地社会结构和外部工业压力的交集如何塑造农村景观提供了一个绝佳的机会。之前关于非常规天然气开发(UGD)的社会反应的研究探讨了支持或反对行业发展的动机。研究揭示了人们对UGD产业出现较早和较晚(或根本不存在)的不同看法。我们探讨了为什么在不同发展阶段的地区之间可能存在系统性差异的问题,将社会表征理论与社会许可概念相结合,以解释对UGD的态度差异。源于社会心理学的社会表征理论描述了群体如何描述概念、想法或对象。社会表征支撑着社区观点、意见、态度和行为的发展,有助于理解社区如何应对新的工业发展(Deaux & Philogene, 2001;Evensen and Stedman, 2016;莫斯科维奇,2001)。社会表征是集体产生的问题特征,然后由个人在不同程度上内化。“社会经营许可证”也是一个社区层面的属性,它混合了社会层面和个人层面的前因。社会许可经营的概念为理解社区对工业发展的反应提供了一个框架,在这个框架上可以放置一系列社区观点、意见、态度和行为(Dare, Schirmer, & Vanclay, 2014;Luke, Lloyd, Boyd, & den Exter, 2014;Thomson & Boutilier, 2011)。社会表征可以包括对UGD和UGD行业影响的描述,每一种都可能影响对社会许可存在与否程度的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信