“Landscape” and “Space Consciousness” in Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children: Shortfalls in the Analytic Diasporic Eye

Shuvendu Ghosh, R. Bhushan, Maninder Kapoor
{"title":"“Landscape” and “Space Consciousness” in Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children: Shortfalls in the Analytic Diasporic Eye","authors":"Shuvendu Ghosh, R. Bhushan, Maninder Kapoor","doi":"10.48189/nl.2022.v03i1.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diasporic lens often misses the ground zero reality of the cultural space of the Indian multicultural dynamic. Salman Rushdie dramatized the issue of “space-consciousness” or “borderline-consciousness” of Kashmir, Bangladesh and Bombay in Midnight’s Children from an emotional or cognitive mode of mapping. As a mestize, Rushdie’s portrait of Indian culture, history and politics can never be an accurate estimate of the vastness of the Indian experience. Rushdie as a privileged post-colonial cultural relativist viewed Indian multicultural ethnicity from the top (a colonial male gaze). With the help of the compare and contrast research technique, this paper will try to comprehend the limitations of the diasporic cognitive cultural mapping of Midnight’s Children as opposed to the strengths of a cartographic landscape assessed through discourse analysis. The comprehension of the “Oriental Crisis” in the domain of literature and cultural studies could enable a gauging of the research gap in determining the limitations of “Landscape” and “Space-Consciousness” from an analytic diasporic eye. “New Mestiza Consciousness”, “Landscape”, “Critical Marxism”, “Eco-Feminism” and “Psycho analytic Criticism” under critical discourse analysis are some multicultural perspectives that may help to identify the research gap and the research questions. Indian history and politics have always had a direct influence in shaping Indian culture, and to some extent the east still carries the “White man’s burden” even in estimating one’s indigenous cultural identity and value before the world. Rushdie as a colonial mimic no doubt extended the legacy of the “White man’s / woman’s burden” seeing it from a diasporic eye. The distinction between “self” and “other” is selfcontradictory in any diasporic writing and Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children is no exception. Saleem’s non-linear narration, imagination, and lack of factual evidence in presenting Indian culture, history and politics are questionable in terms of authenticity before the reader. In Midnight’s Children, Padma, portrayed by Rushdie, as an epistemological, metaphoric, oriental puppet often questions Saleem’s reliability as a narrator.","PeriodicalId":205595,"journal":{"name":"New Literaria","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2022.v03i1.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diasporic lens often misses the ground zero reality of the cultural space of the Indian multicultural dynamic. Salman Rushdie dramatized the issue of “space-consciousness” or “borderline-consciousness” of Kashmir, Bangladesh and Bombay in Midnight’s Children from an emotional or cognitive mode of mapping. As a mestize, Rushdie’s portrait of Indian culture, history and politics can never be an accurate estimate of the vastness of the Indian experience. Rushdie as a privileged post-colonial cultural relativist viewed Indian multicultural ethnicity from the top (a colonial male gaze). With the help of the compare and contrast research technique, this paper will try to comprehend the limitations of the diasporic cognitive cultural mapping of Midnight’s Children as opposed to the strengths of a cartographic landscape assessed through discourse analysis. The comprehension of the “Oriental Crisis” in the domain of literature and cultural studies could enable a gauging of the research gap in determining the limitations of “Landscape” and “Space-Consciousness” from an analytic diasporic eye. “New Mestiza Consciousness”, “Landscape”, “Critical Marxism”, “Eco-Feminism” and “Psycho analytic Criticism” under critical discourse analysis are some multicultural perspectives that may help to identify the research gap and the research questions. Indian history and politics have always had a direct influence in shaping Indian culture, and to some extent the east still carries the “White man’s burden” even in estimating one’s indigenous cultural identity and value before the world. Rushdie as a colonial mimic no doubt extended the legacy of the “White man’s / woman’s burden” seeing it from a diasporic eye. The distinction between “self” and “other” is selfcontradictory in any diasporic writing and Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children is no exception. Saleem’s non-linear narration, imagination, and lack of factual evidence in presenting Indian culture, history and politics are questionable in terms of authenticity before the reader. In Midnight’s Children, Padma, portrayed by Rushdie, as an epistemological, metaphoric, oriental puppet often questions Saleem’s reliability as a narrator.
萨尔曼·拉什迪《午夜的孩子》中的“景观”和“空间意识”:分析散居者眼中的不足
流散的镜头往往忽略了印度多元文化动态的文化空间的零现实。在《午夜的孩子》中,萨尔曼·拉什迪将克什米尔、孟加拉国和孟买的“空间意识”或“边界意识”问题从情感或认知的映射模式中戏剧化了。拉什迪对印度文化、历史和政治的描绘,作为一部杂糅作品,永远无法准确估计印度经历的广泛性。拉什迪作为一个享有特权的后殖民文化相对主义者,从上层(殖民时期的男性视角)看待印度的多元文化种族。借助比较与对比研究技术,本文将试图理解《午夜的孩子》的流散认知文化映射的局限性,而不是通过话语分析评估的地图景观的优势。在文学和文化研究领域对“东方危机”的理解,可以从分析流散的视角来衡量在确定“景观”和“空间意识”的局限性方面的研究差距。批判话语分析下的“新梅斯蒂萨意识”、“景观”、“批判马克思主义”、“生态女性主义”和“精神分析批评”等多元文化视角有助于识别研究缺口和研究问题。印度的历史和政治一直对印度文化的形成有着直接的影响,在某种程度上,即使在世界面前评估自己的本土文化身份和价值,东方也仍然背负着“白人的负担”。拉什迪作为一个殖民时期的模仿者,无疑扩展了“白人男性/女性的负担”的遗产,从流散者的角度来看待它。“自我”与“他者”的区别在任何散居作品中都是自相矛盾的,拉什迪的《午夜的孩子》也不例外。Saleem在呈现印度文化、历史和政治时的非线性叙事、想象力和缺乏事实证据,在读者面前的真实性值得怀疑。在《午夜的孩子》中,拉什迪笔下的帕德玛是一个认识论的、隐喻的东方木偶,她经常质疑萨利姆作为叙述者的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信