Evaluation of a customized 3D-printed saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study.

Seungeon Lee, Jinsu Kang, Namsoo Kim, S. Heo
{"title":"Evaluation of a customized 3D-printed saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study.","authors":"Seungeon Lee, Jinsu Kang, Namsoo Kim, S. Heo","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine whether a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) performed with a customized 3D-printed guide and jig is more accurate than the traditional technique using a jig alone.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nIn vitro study.\n\n\nSAMPLE POPULATION\nCadaveric canine pelvic limbs (n = 10) and 20 synthetic bone models.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTibial plateau leveling osteotomy using a jig with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in bone models, and TPLO using a jig with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in cadaveric limbs. Angulation of the osteotomy, angulation of the proximal jig pin, angular/torsional deformity and medial cortex damage were measured from photographs of the specimens and compared.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn the bone models, there were differences with and without the 3D guide for mean osteotomy inclination (-0.06° vs. -1.74°, P < .001), osteotomy torsion (5268 vs. 10 469 visible osteotomy pixels, P < .001), and medial cortical damage (2970 vs. 18 562 pixels, P < .001). In the cadaveric study, osteotomy inclination (-1.1° vs. 1.01°, P < .01), induced angular deformity (0.17° vs. -3.01°, P < .001) and angulation of the proximal jig pin (-0.27° vs. 0.80°, P < .001) differed between groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe 3D-printed guide during TPLO resulted in slightly more accurate osteotomies and proximal jig pin placement, and reduced medial cortex damage.\n\n\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\nA customized 3D-printed guide may improve intraoperative accuracy for TPLO, although the clinical significance of the small benefits is unknown.","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) performed with a customized 3D-printed guide and jig is more accurate than the traditional technique using a jig alone. STUDY DESIGN In vitro study. SAMPLE POPULATION Cadaveric canine pelvic limbs (n = 10) and 20 synthetic bone models. METHODS Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy using a jig with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in bone models, and TPLO using a jig with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in cadaveric limbs. Angulation of the osteotomy, angulation of the proximal jig pin, angular/torsional deformity and medial cortex damage were measured from photographs of the specimens and compared. RESULTS In the bone models, there were differences with and without the 3D guide for mean osteotomy inclination (-0.06° vs. -1.74°, P < .001), osteotomy torsion (5268 vs. 10 469 visible osteotomy pixels, P < .001), and medial cortical damage (2970 vs. 18 562 pixels, P < .001). In the cadaveric study, osteotomy inclination (-1.1° vs. 1.01°, P < .01), induced angular deformity (0.17° vs. -3.01°, P < .001) and angulation of the proximal jig pin (-0.27° vs. 0.80°, P < .001) differed between groups. CONCLUSION The 3D-printed guide during TPLO resulted in slightly more accurate osteotomies and proximal jig pin placement, and reduced medial cortex damage. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE A customized 3D-printed guide may improve intraoperative accuracy for TPLO, although the clinical significance of the small benefits is unknown.
评估定制的3d打印锯引导胫骨平台水平截骨:离体研究。
目的探讨采用定制3d打印导轨和夹具进行胫骨平台水平截骨术(TPLO)是否比单独使用夹具的传统技术更准确。研究设计体外研究。样本群尸体犬骨盆肢(n = 10)和20个合成骨模型。方法在骨模型上分别使用(n = 10)和(n = 10)定制3d打印导向器进行胫骨平台水平截骨,在尸体肢体上分别使用(n = 5)和(n = 5)定制3d打印导向器进行TPLO。从标本的照片中测量截骨角度、近端夹具角度、角/扭转畸形和内侧皮质损伤并进行比较。结果在骨模型中,有和没有3D引导的平均截骨倾角(-0.06°vs -1.74°,P < .001)、截骨扭转(5268 vs. 10469可见截骨像素,P < .001)和内侧皮质损伤(2970 vs. 18562像素,P < .001)存在差异。在尸体研究中,截骨倾角(-1.1°vs. 1.01°,P < 0.01)、诱导角度畸形(0.17°vs. -3.01°,P < 0.001)和近端夹具成角(-0.27°vs. 0.80°,P < 0.001)在两组之间存在差异。结论3d打印导具在TPLO术中截骨和近端夹针放置精度略高,减少内侧皮质损伤。定制的3d打印导具可提高TPLO术中准确性,但其微小益处的临床意义尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信