POST-SECULARITY AS A SUBJECT OF RESEARCH: PROBLEMS OF CONCEPTUALIZATION AND PLURALITY OF APPROACHES

{"title":"POST-SECULARITY AS A SUBJECT OF RESEARCH: PROBLEMS OF CONCEPTUALIZATION AND PLURALITY OF APPROACHES","authors":"","doi":"10.26565/2077-5105-2020-23-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, in many countries around the world, the role of religion in the public sphere is strengthening. This causes the methodological problems of the theory of secularization, which claimed the gradual and irreversible decline of religion. At the same time, the processes of religious revival in societies that have undergone secularization do not lead to the restoration of religion in the forms that preceded it. To denote this state of society, which occurs after secularization, Jürgen Habermas proposed to use the term \"post-secular\". A number of both foreign and domestic scientists became interested in this issue. But the purposeful study of postsecularity is still in its infancy and is mostly descriptive. In the scientific works devoted to its research, insufficient attention is focused on specific characteristics of postsecular societies. Therefore, there is a need to generalize these characteristics in order to better understand post-secular society. To achieve this goal, the article analyzes some conceptual approaches to the study of postsecularity. These approaches argue that the \"return\" of religion does not preclude the preservation of a powerful (or even dominant) secularization cluster in society. Post-secularization is a move forward and the creation of a new system characterized by religious freedom, pluralism, competition between different denominations, rather than a return to the traditions of the pre-modern era. In a post-secular society, as the authors of the works analyzed in the article prove, religion has all the opportunities from secular power for its development. At the same time, there is a reduction in the role of religious institutions and the individualization of religious practices, ie the \"privatization\" of religion, which is an element of secularization. But this \"privatization\" is significantly different from secularization, because it is not due to coercion, but to pluralism of choice. According to many researchers, a post-secular situation is possible under the condition of ideological pluralism and parity between religious and non-religious people, when each party has the opportunity to propagate its opinion, but does not impose it, when there is no place for privileged and discriminated, but awareness of mutual coexistence. That is, post-secularity is possible only in democratic and legal societies. The post-secular situation is also characterized by religious competition, intensification of missionary work, manifestations of fundamentalism, globalization of religious piety, transformation of religion into a commodity and the emergence (mostly in the West) of the phenomenon used to refer to the term \"spirituality\". The situation of post-secularism is a situation of uncertainty, when it is not known how the processes of interaction between the secular and the religious will take place in the future, and it is impossible to make any predictions about how stable this situation is. As the analysis carried out in the article shows, the post-secular approach has not become a full-fledged theory, but is perceived mostly as a program of what should be paid attention to, as a certain correction and continuation of the secularization approach. But with its help, scientists are trying to describe religious processes in modern societies.","PeriodicalId":153351,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Sociological Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Sociological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2077-5105-2020-23-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, in many countries around the world, the role of religion in the public sphere is strengthening. This causes the methodological problems of the theory of secularization, which claimed the gradual and irreversible decline of religion. At the same time, the processes of religious revival in societies that have undergone secularization do not lead to the restoration of religion in the forms that preceded it. To denote this state of society, which occurs after secularization, Jürgen Habermas proposed to use the term "post-secular". A number of both foreign and domestic scientists became interested in this issue. But the purposeful study of postsecularity is still in its infancy and is mostly descriptive. In the scientific works devoted to its research, insufficient attention is focused on specific characteristics of postsecular societies. Therefore, there is a need to generalize these characteristics in order to better understand post-secular society. To achieve this goal, the article analyzes some conceptual approaches to the study of postsecularity. These approaches argue that the "return" of religion does not preclude the preservation of a powerful (or even dominant) secularization cluster in society. Post-secularization is a move forward and the creation of a new system characterized by religious freedom, pluralism, competition between different denominations, rather than a return to the traditions of the pre-modern era. In a post-secular society, as the authors of the works analyzed in the article prove, religion has all the opportunities from secular power for its development. At the same time, there is a reduction in the role of religious institutions and the individualization of religious practices, ie the "privatization" of religion, which is an element of secularization. But this "privatization" is significantly different from secularization, because it is not due to coercion, but to pluralism of choice. According to many researchers, a post-secular situation is possible under the condition of ideological pluralism and parity between religious and non-religious people, when each party has the opportunity to propagate its opinion, but does not impose it, when there is no place for privileged and discriminated, but awareness of mutual coexistence. That is, post-secularity is possible only in democratic and legal societies. The post-secular situation is also characterized by religious competition, intensification of missionary work, manifestations of fundamentalism, globalization of religious piety, transformation of religion into a commodity and the emergence (mostly in the West) of the phenomenon used to refer to the term "spirituality". The situation of post-secularism is a situation of uncertainty, when it is not known how the processes of interaction between the secular and the religious will take place in the future, and it is impossible to make any predictions about how stable this situation is. As the analysis carried out in the article shows, the post-secular approach has not become a full-fledged theory, but is perceived mostly as a program of what should be paid attention to, as a certain correction and continuation of the secularization approach. But with its help, scientists are trying to describe religious processes in modern societies.
作为研究主题的后世俗性:概念化与研究方法多元化的问题
今天,在世界上许多国家,宗教在公共领域的作用正在加强。这导致了世俗化理论的方法论问题,世俗化理论声称宗教的逐渐和不可逆转的衰落。与此同时,在经历了世俗化的社会中,宗教复兴的过程并不会导致宗教恢复到以前的形式。为了表示这种发生在世俗化之后的社会状态,j根·哈贝马斯提出使用“后世俗”一词。许多国内外科学家对这个问题产生了兴趣。但是,对后世俗性的有目的研究仍处于起步阶段,而且主要是描述性的。在致力于其研究的科学著作中,对后世俗社会的具体特征关注不够。因此,有必要概括这些特征,以便更好地理解后世俗社会。为了达到这个目的,本文分析了一些研究后世俗性的概念方法。这些方法认为,宗教的“回归”并不排除在社会中保留一个强大的(甚至是占主导地位的)世俗化集群。后世俗化是一种进步,是一种以宗教自由、多元主义、不同教派之间竞争为特征的新体系的创造,而不是回到前现代时代的传统。在一个后世俗社会中,正如本文所分析的作品的作者所证明的那样,宗教拥有来自世俗权力的一切发展机会。同时,宗教机构的作用减少,宗教活动的个体化,即宗教的“私有化”,这是世俗化的一个因素。但这种“私有化”与世俗化明显不同,因为它不是由于强制,而是由于选择的多元化。许多研究人员认为,在意识形态多元化和宗教人士与非宗教人士平等的条件下,当每个政党都有机会宣传自己的意见,但不强加于人,当没有特权和歧视的地方,而是意识到相互共存时,后世俗局面是可能的。也就是说,后世俗主义只有在民主和法治社会中才有可能。后世俗形势的另一个特点是宗教竞争、传教工作的加强、原教旨主义的表现、宗教虔诚的全球化、宗教转化为商品以及用于指称“灵性”一词的现象的出现(主要在西方)。后世俗主义的情况是一种不确定的情况,不知道未来世俗与宗教之间的互动过程将如何发生,也不可能预测这种情况有多稳定。正如文章中所进行的分析所显示的那样,后世俗方法并没有成为一种成熟的理论,而主要被视为一种应该注意的方案,是对世俗化方法的某种纠正和延续。但在它的帮助下,科学家们正试图描述现代社会中的宗教进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信