Using Advanced Probability of Exceedance Methods for Defining Remediation Options

T. Bubenik, B. Hanna, W. Harper, Matthew A. Ellinger
{"title":"Using Advanced Probability of Exceedance Methods for Defining Remediation Options","authors":"T. Bubenik, B. Hanna, W. Harper, Matthew A. Ellinger","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Probability of Exceedance (POE) methodology is used by pipeline operators to manage corrosion. It prioritizes anomalies identified by an in-line inspection (ILI) based on their likelihood of exceeding one or more failure thresholds. Two types of thresholds are commonly used: leak and rupture. The calculations represent the likelihood an anomaly will leak or rupture as a function of time. By assessing the likelihood of such a release as a function of time, an operator can design rational and statistically valid remediation programs.\n In this study, the likelihood that an anomaly will cause a leak or rupture was based on the ILI dimensions, the ILI system’s accuracies, and the corrosion growth rate at the anomaly location. The ILI dimensions were adjusted by the mean error as determined using ILI-to-field comparison data. The same ILI-to-field data were used to determine the scatter (standard deviation) in reported dimensions for different categories of anomalies.\n The POE (likelihood) of a leak or rupture was taken as a function of the mean and standard deviation of a corrosion growth rate at the anomaly location. Anomalies were “grown” using mean growth rates that were established by performing ILI run-to-run comparisons. By using accurate growth rates and ILI performance characteristics, realistic estimates were made of the POE of an anomaly, pipe joint, pipe segment, and the overall pipeline itself.\n This paper discusses improved methods of calculating leak and rupture POEs using realistic assumptions on how anomaly growth occurs as a function of time. Case studies are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the advanced POE method.\n The introduction and select portions of this paper are based, in part, on “Advanced Probability of Exceedance Method Overcomes Previous Weaknesses,” by the authors,1Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference, February 2–4, 2022.","PeriodicalId":264830,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"2009 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Probability of Exceedance (POE) methodology is used by pipeline operators to manage corrosion. It prioritizes anomalies identified by an in-line inspection (ILI) based on their likelihood of exceeding one or more failure thresholds. Two types of thresholds are commonly used: leak and rupture. The calculations represent the likelihood an anomaly will leak or rupture as a function of time. By assessing the likelihood of such a release as a function of time, an operator can design rational and statistically valid remediation programs. In this study, the likelihood that an anomaly will cause a leak or rupture was based on the ILI dimensions, the ILI system’s accuracies, and the corrosion growth rate at the anomaly location. The ILI dimensions were adjusted by the mean error as determined using ILI-to-field comparison data. The same ILI-to-field data were used to determine the scatter (standard deviation) in reported dimensions for different categories of anomalies. The POE (likelihood) of a leak or rupture was taken as a function of the mean and standard deviation of a corrosion growth rate at the anomaly location. Anomalies were “grown” using mean growth rates that were established by performing ILI run-to-run comparisons. By using accurate growth rates and ILI performance characteristics, realistic estimates were made of the POE of an anomaly, pipe joint, pipe segment, and the overall pipeline itself. This paper discusses improved methods of calculating leak and rupture POEs using realistic assumptions on how anomaly growth occurs as a function of time. Case studies are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the advanced POE method. The introduction and select portions of this paper are based, in part, on “Advanced Probability of Exceedance Method Overcomes Previous Weaknesses,” by the authors,1Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference, February 2–4, 2022.
使用先进的超越概率方法来定义补救方案
管道运营商使用超出概率(POE)方法来管理腐蚀。它根据超过一个或多个故障阈值的可能性,对在线检查(ILI)识别的异常进行优先级排序。常用的阈值有两种:泄漏和破裂。计算结果代表了异常泄漏或破裂的可能性作为时间的函数。通过评估这种释放作为时间函数的可能性,操作人员可以设计合理且统计上有效的补救方案。在本研究中,异常导致泄漏或破裂的可能性是基于ILI的尺寸、ILI系统的精度以及异常位置的腐蚀增长速度。ILI维度通过ILI-to-field比较数据确定的平均误差进行调整。使用相同的i -to-field数据来确定不同类别异常的报告维度的散点(标准差)。POE(泄漏或破裂的可能性)作为异常位置腐蚀增长率的平均值和标准差的函数。利用ILI逐行比较建立的平均增长率“增长”异常。通过使用准确的增长率和ILI性能特征,对异常、管接头、管段和整个管道本身的POE进行了现实的估计。本文讨论了计算泄漏和破裂POEs的改进方法,该方法使用了关于异常增长如何作为时间函数发生的现实假设。通过实例分析,验证了该方法的有效性。本文的引言和选择部分基于作者在2022年2月2日至4日举行的管道清管和完整性管理会议上提出的“先进的超越概率方法克服了以前的缺点”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信