Rethinking Artificial Intelligence

N. Howard
{"title":"Rethinking Artificial Intelligence","authors":"N. Howard","doi":"10.1109/ICCI-CC.2015.7259423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern school of Artificial Intelligence was originally expected to provide a full working model of intelligence as a set of procedures. Scholars implemented these procedures over time to conceptualize the notion of an intelligent machine. Computer scientists rushed to implement working models that would allegedly reach beyond many limits. Perhaps the most debilitating act was equating what is efficient in procedures to what is artificialized in intelligence. Equally debilitating was interpreting the speed of arithmetic calculations as a quantifier: it led to teams being interpreting speed and accuracy as reflections of intelligence. In order to reach an artificial form of intelligence that is faithful to the amalgam of biological, physical and chemical that it seeks to imitate; scholars of AI must reach a deeper synthesis of its integrative nature, leading to the creation of many artificial synthetic forms of Intelligence, instead of a single vision of intelligence that simply focuses on matching the performance of the human brain. Having said that, we can clearly concur that most of the AI Modern School's limitations have been discovered and are well-documented and known to the AI community. Our aim is to discuss a number of these issues, particularly the limits previously described. We avow that these limits emerged from epistemological misunderstandings on the perceived meanings of intelligence itself, leading to the limits imposed in the current interpretations of AI. Future work in AI, or alternatively coined Synthetic Intelligence, must revisit fundamental assumptions about the nature of the brain, cognition, computing, and intelligence. Synthetic Intelligence focuses on the phenomena such as intelligence and consciousness, and mapping them to the physics of the brain and models of brain processes at each of its multiple levels. It is the ‘stack’ of brain subsystems at multiple levels, from cortical down to molecular, joined by a common thread, that make up a mind. What we need are mathematically described mechanisms and information structures to integrate computational discourse analysis, value systems, mapping of cognitive structures to neuron interactions and to the molecular mechanisms of such interactions. The key to this discovery will be the study of emergence of intelligence and consciousness in engineered systems - implemented in silico or in vitro.","PeriodicalId":167843,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCI-CC.2015.7259423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The modern school of Artificial Intelligence was originally expected to provide a full working model of intelligence as a set of procedures. Scholars implemented these procedures over time to conceptualize the notion of an intelligent machine. Computer scientists rushed to implement working models that would allegedly reach beyond many limits. Perhaps the most debilitating act was equating what is efficient in procedures to what is artificialized in intelligence. Equally debilitating was interpreting the speed of arithmetic calculations as a quantifier: it led to teams being interpreting speed and accuracy as reflections of intelligence. In order to reach an artificial form of intelligence that is faithful to the amalgam of biological, physical and chemical that it seeks to imitate; scholars of AI must reach a deeper synthesis of its integrative nature, leading to the creation of many artificial synthetic forms of Intelligence, instead of a single vision of intelligence that simply focuses on matching the performance of the human brain. Having said that, we can clearly concur that most of the AI Modern School's limitations have been discovered and are well-documented and known to the AI community. Our aim is to discuss a number of these issues, particularly the limits previously described. We avow that these limits emerged from epistemological misunderstandings on the perceived meanings of intelligence itself, leading to the limits imposed in the current interpretations of AI. Future work in AI, or alternatively coined Synthetic Intelligence, must revisit fundamental assumptions about the nature of the brain, cognition, computing, and intelligence. Synthetic Intelligence focuses on the phenomena such as intelligence and consciousness, and mapping them to the physics of the brain and models of brain processes at each of its multiple levels. It is the ‘stack’ of brain subsystems at multiple levels, from cortical down to molecular, joined by a common thread, that make up a mind. What we need are mathematically described mechanisms and information structures to integrate computational discourse analysis, value systems, mapping of cognitive structures to neuron interactions and to the molecular mechanisms of such interactions. The key to this discovery will be the study of emergence of intelligence and consciousness in engineered systems - implemented in silico or in vitro.
重新思考人工智能
现代人工智能学派最初期望提供作为一套程序的完整智能工作模型。随着时间的推移,学者们实施了这些程序来概念化智能机器的概念。计算机科学家们急于实现据称将超越许多限制的工作模型。也许最让人衰弱的行为是将程序中的效率等同于人工智能中的效率。同样令人沮丧的是,将算术计算的速度解释为量词:它导致团队将速度和准确性解释为智力的反映。为了达到一种人工智能形式,它忠实于它试图模仿的生物、物理和化学的混合体;人工智能学者必须对其综合性质进行更深层次的综合,从而创造出许多人工合成形式的智能,而不是仅仅关注与人类大脑的表现相匹配的单一智能愿景。话虽如此,我们可以清楚地同意,AI现代学派的大多数局限性已经被发现,并且被AI社区充分记录和了解。我们的目的是讨论其中的一些问题,特别是前面描述的限制。我们承认,这些限制来自于对智能本身感知意义的认识论误解,导致了当前对人工智能的解释所施加的限制。人工智能或人工智能的未来工作必须重新审视关于大脑、认知、计算和智能本质的基本假设。人工智能专注于智力和意识等现象,并将它们映射到大脑的物理和大脑过程的模型中,在每个层面上。它是大脑子系统在多个层次上的“堆栈”,从皮层到分子,由一条共同的线索连接起来,构成了一个思想。我们需要的是数学上描述的机制和信息结构,以整合计算话语分析、价值系统、认知结构映射到神经元相互作用以及这种相互作用的分子机制。这一发现的关键将是研究智能和意识在工程系统中的出现——在计算机或体外实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信