THE PROBLEM OF CORRUPTION LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT CAUSES STATE LOSSES SINCE THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 25 / PUU-XIV / 2016 DECISION

POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.55047/polri.v1i3.204

Muhammad Zaki, Tofik Y Chandra, Hedwig Adianto Mau

{"title":"THE PROBLEM OF CORRUPTION LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT CAUSES STATE LOSSES SINCE THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 25 / PUU-XIV / 2016 DECISION","authors":"Muhammad Zaki, Tofik Y Chandra, Hedwig Adianto Mau","doi":"10.55047/polri.v1i3.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"are increasingly widespread, so that the boundaries of the characteristics of acts of corruption and the characteristics of acts that are not corrupt but characterized by very detrimental to the state and society become difficult to distinguish, and lead to uncertainty about how to formulate groups. his crime. This research is a normative legal research that uses primary and secondary legal sources with library research collection techniques through legislation approach, historical approach and case approach. The results obtained are the legal considerations of the judges of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 25/PUU/XIV/2016 in Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption in Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016 which grants the abolition of the phrase “can” is to create legal certainty for the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) regarding discretionary policies or decisions or the implementation of the Ermessen freies principle which is criminalized as a criminal act of corruption because it is detrimental to state finances.","PeriodicalId":434803,"journal":{"name":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i3.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

are increasingly widespread, so that the boundaries of the characteristics of acts of corruption and the characteristics of acts that are not corrupt but characterized by very detrimental to the state and society become difficult to distinguish, and lead to uncertainty about how to formulate groups. his crime. This research is a normative legal research that uses primary and secondary legal sources with library research collection techniques through legislation approach, historical approach and case approach. The results obtained are the legal considerations of the judges of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 25/PUU/XIV/2016 in Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption in Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016 which grants the abolition of the phrase “can” is to create legal certainty for the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) regarding discretionary policies or decisions or the implementation of the Ermessen freies principle which is criminalized as a criminal act of corruption because it is detrimental to state finances.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自印度尼西亚共和国宪法法院第25 / puu-xiv / 2016号决定以来，导致国家损失的腐败执法问题

越来越普遍，使腐败行为的特征与不腐败但特征对国家和社会非常有害的行为的界限变得难以区分，并导致如何制定群体的不确定性。他的犯罪。本研究采用立法法、历史法和案例法，运用图书馆研究收集技术，运用一手和第二手法律资料进行规范性法律研究。获得的结果是宪法法院的法官的法律考量的印度尼西亚共和国宪法法院的决定25号/噗/十四/ 2016条2款(1)和第三条数20 2001年关于根除腐败的犯罪行为决定25号/ PUU-XIV / 2016赠款废除“可以”一词是创建法律确定性的国家民事机构关于自由政策或(ASN)决定或埃尔梅森自由原则的实施被定为腐败犯罪行为，因为它不利于国家财政。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)

自引率

0.00%

发文量