Click traffic analysis of short URL spam on Twitter

De Wang, S. Navathe, Ling Liu, Danesh Irani, Acar Tamersoy, C. Pu
{"title":"Click traffic analysis of short URL spam on Twitter","authors":"De Wang, S. Navathe, Ling Liu, Danesh Irani, Acar Tamersoy, C. Pu","doi":"10.4108/ICST.COLLABORATECOM.2013.254084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With an average of 80% length reduction, the URL shorteners have become the norm for sharing URLs on Twitter, mainly due to the 140-character limit per message. Unfortunately, spammers have also adopted the URL shorteners to camouflage and improve the user click-through of their spam URLs. In this paper, we measure the misuse of the short URLs and analyze the characteristics of the spam and non-spam short URLs. We utilize these measurements to enable the detection of spam short URLs. To achieve this, we collected short URLs from Twitter and retrieved their click traffic data from Bitly, a popular URL shortening system. We first investigate the creators of over 600,000 Bitly short URLs to characterize short URL spammers. We then analyze the click traffic generated from various countries and referrers, and determine the top click sources for spam and non-spam short URLs. Our results show that the majority of the clicks are from direct sources and that the spammers utilize popular websites to attract more attention by cross-posting the links. We then use the click traffic data to classify the short URLs into spam vs. non-spam and compare the performance of the selected classifiers on the dataset. We determine that the Random Tree algorithm achieves the best performance with an accuracy of 90.81% and an F-measure value of 0.913.","PeriodicalId":222111,"journal":{"name":"9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"79","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.COLLABORATECOM.2013.254084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

Abstract

With an average of 80% length reduction, the URL shorteners have become the norm for sharing URLs on Twitter, mainly due to the 140-character limit per message. Unfortunately, spammers have also adopted the URL shorteners to camouflage and improve the user click-through of their spam URLs. In this paper, we measure the misuse of the short URLs and analyze the characteristics of the spam and non-spam short URLs. We utilize these measurements to enable the detection of spam short URLs. To achieve this, we collected short URLs from Twitter and retrieved their click traffic data from Bitly, a popular URL shortening system. We first investigate the creators of over 600,000 Bitly short URLs to characterize short URL spammers. We then analyze the click traffic generated from various countries and referrers, and determine the top click sources for spam and non-spam short URLs. Our results show that the majority of the clicks are from direct sources and that the spammers utilize popular websites to attract more attention by cross-posting the links. We then use the click traffic data to classify the short URLs into spam vs. non-spam and compare the performance of the selected classifiers on the dataset. We determine that the Random Tree algorithm achieves the best performance with an accuracy of 90.81% and an F-measure value of 0.913.
Twitter短URL垃圾点击流量分析
由于平均缩短80%的长度,URL缩短器已经成为Twitter上分享URL的标准,主要是由于每条消息的140个字符限制。不幸的是,垃圾邮件发送者也采用了URL缩短器来伪装和提高用户对垃圾邮件URL的点击率。本文对短url的误用进行了度量,分析了垃圾短url和非垃圾短url的特征。我们利用这些度量来检测垃圾短url。为了做到这一点,我们从Twitter收集了短网址,并从Bitly(一个流行的网址缩短系统)检索了他们的点击流量数据。我们首先调查了超过600,000个Bitly短URL的创建者,以表征短URL垃圾邮件发送者。然后,我们分析来自不同国家和推荐人的点击流量,并确定垃圾和非垃圾短url的顶级点击来源。我们的结果表明,大多数点击来自直接来源,垃圾邮件发送者利用热门网站通过交叉发布链接来吸引更多的关注。然后,我们使用点击流量数据将短url分为垃圾邮件和非垃圾邮件,并比较所选分类器在数据集上的性能。我们确定Random Tree算法达到了最佳性能,准确率为90.81%,f测量值为0.913。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信