Critical Risk Path Method: A Risk and Contingency-Driven Model for Construction Procurement in Complex and Dynamic Projects

Chi Iromuanya, Kathleen M. Hargiss, Caroline Howard
{"title":"Critical Risk Path Method: A Risk and Contingency-Driven Model for Construction Procurement in Complex and Dynamic Projects","authors":"Chi Iromuanya, Kathleen M. Hargiss, Caroline Howard","doi":"10.4018/jsita.2013040105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing approaches to risk management in construction procurement primarily dwell on strategies designed for commonly identifiable risk factors in typical project environments. Commonly identifiable risk factors would include too early or late material delivery-a condition typically ameliorated by implementing a Just In Time JIT plan; inferior construction materials typically mitigated by employing trusted vendors; or ineffective contractors primarily avoided by the use of experienced contractors. The purpose of this paper is to present a coherent model for procurement risk management for construction and infrastructure development projects within the context of dynamic project environments-complex, or chaotic. For the purpose of this study, a critical risk path activity is one in which a delay of activity completion not only leads to project delay, but does so in a manner that may be fatal to project or at best, far greater than the actual delay. The study incorporates observations and theory with practical application for improving initiatives by emergency infrastructure development response organizations such as FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency and USACE US Army Corps of Engineers in the United States, the NEMA National Emergency Management Agency in Nigeria, or ANDMA Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority etc. This study presents risk response plans aimed at improving the potential occurrence of positive risk aspects while reducing, or eliminating the same for negative risk occurrences. This study explored material, equipment, and skilled labor procurement strategies related to project risk management from the perspectives of scheduling, cost, and quality-three factors often referred to as the triple project constraints. It identified gaps within specific national and multinational organizations' approaches, and provided detailed recommendations for process improvements from the procurement management perspective to ensure the potential for successful project outcomes in unstable project conditions.","PeriodicalId":201145,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Strateg. Inf. Technol. Appl.","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Strateg. Inf. Technol. Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jsita.2013040105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Existing approaches to risk management in construction procurement primarily dwell on strategies designed for commonly identifiable risk factors in typical project environments. Commonly identifiable risk factors would include too early or late material delivery-a condition typically ameliorated by implementing a Just In Time JIT plan; inferior construction materials typically mitigated by employing trusted vendors; or ineffective contractors primarily avoided by the use of experienced contractors. The purpose of this paper is to present a coherent model for procurement risk management for construction and infrastructure development projects within the context of dynamic project environments-complex, or chaotic. For the purpose of this study, a critical risk path activity is one in which a delay of activity completion not only leads to project delay, but does so in a manner that may be fatal to project or at best, far greater than the actual delay. The study incorporates observations and theory with practical application for improving initiatives by emergency infrastructure development response organizations such as FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency and USACE US Army Corps of Engineers in the United States, the NEMA National Emergency Management Agency in Nigeria, or ANDMA Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority etc. This study presents risk response plans aimed at improving the potential occurrence of positive risk aspects while reducing, or eliminating the same for negative risk occurrences. This study explored material, equipment, and skilled labor procurement strategies related to project risk management from the perspectives of scheduling, cost, and quality-three factors often referred to as the triple project constraints. It identified gaps within specific national and multinational organizations' approaches, and provided detailed recommendations for process improvements from the procurement management perspective to ensure the potential for successful project outcomes in unstable project conditions.
关键风险路径方法:复杂动态项目中风险与权变驱动的建筑采购模型
现有的建筑采购风险管理方法主要是针对典型项目环境中常见的风险因素而设计的策略。通常可识别的风险因素包括太早或太晚的材料交付——这种情况通常通过实施准时制JIT计划来改善;劣质建筑材料通常通过雇用可靠的供应商来缓解;或无效的承包商主要避免使用有经验的承包商。本文的目的是在动态项目环境(复杂或混乱)的背景下,为建筑和基础设施开发项目提供一个连贯的采购风险管理模型。为了本研究的目的,关键风险路径活动是指活动完成的延迟不仅导致项目延迟,而且对项目可能是致命的,或者充其量是远远大于实际延迟的活动。该研究将观察和理论与实际应用相结合,以改进紧急基础设施发展响应组织的举措,这些组织包括联邦紧急事务管理局和美国陆军工程兵团、尼日利亚国家紧急事务管理局或阿富汗国家灾害管理局等。本研究提出了风险应对计划,旨在提高积极风险方面的潜在发生,同时减少或消除消极风险的发生。本研究从进度、成本和质量的角度探讨了与项目风险管理相关的材料、设备和熟练劳动力采购策略——这三个因素通常被称为三重项目约束。它确定了具体国家组织和多国组织的方法中的差距,并从采购管理的角度提出了改进程序的详细建议,以确保在不稳定的项目条件下取得成功的项目成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信