Intrathecal bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial

Sana Urooj, A. Mughal, Madiha Shareef, A. Naz, M. Shah, S. Siddiqui
{"title":"Intrathecal bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Sana Urooj, A. Mughal, Madiha Shareef, A. Naz, M. Shah, S. Siddiqui","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i5.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objectives: Spinal anesthesia is the preferred technique for obstetric patients as it is economical, simple to perform, has a rapid onset and provides complete muscle relaxation. A variety of adjuvants have been used to enhance or prolong its effects. We compared the effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on the onset and recovery times of sensory and motor blockade as well as on hemodynamics, postoperative complications and duration of postoperative analgesia in parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). Methodology: It was a prospective, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Sixty healthy parturients having cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group BD was given 10 mg bupivacaine plus 5 µg of dexmedetomidine and Group BF was given 10 mg bupivacaine plus 10 µg of fentanyl. Parturients was then observed for the onset and recovery times of sensorimotor blockade, hemodynamics, postoperative complications and postoperative analgesia. \nResults: There was no statistically significant difference in the onset of sensorimotor block between the groups. The time to complete sensory and motor recovery was significantly prolonged in Group BD (P = 0.01 and P = 0.0001 respectively) as compared to Group BF. Both groups did not show significant differences in hemodynamic changes, but there was a reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressures ≥ 20% from baseline intraoperative. The VAS at 3 and 4 h postoperatively in the Group BD was significantly lower (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01 respectively). The incidence of complications was found comparable in two groups, except incidence of hypotension and nausea was more in the Group BD compared to Group BF (P = 0.006 and 0.002 respectively). \nConclusion: Although intrathecal dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of sensory block, with comparable hemodynamic changes and good postoperative analgesia, prolonged motor block due to it, compared to intrathecal fentanyl, is not a desirable outcome particularly in short duration surgeries like LSCS, which can increase discharge time from post anesthesia care unit (PACU) to the ward. \nAbbreviations: LSCS: lower segment cesarean section; PACU: post anesthesia care unit; \nCitation: Urooj S, Mughal A, Shareef M, Naz A, Shah MU, Siddiqui SZ. Intrathecal bupivacaine-fentanyl vs. bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;26(5):616-622; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i5.2019 \n ","PeriodicalId":108815,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i5.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: Spinal anesthesia is the preferred technique for obstetric patients as it is economical, simple to perform, has a rapid onset and provides complete muscle relaxation. A variety of adjuvants have been used to enhance or prolong its effects. We compared the effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on the onset and recovery times of sensory and motor blockade as well as on hemodynamics, postoperative complications and duration of postoperative analgesia in parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). Methodology: It was a prospective, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Sixty healthy parturients having cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group BD was given 10 mg bupivacaine plus 5 µg of dexmedetomidine and Group BF was given 10 mg bupivacaine plus 10 µg of fentanyl. Parturients was then observed for the onset and recovery times of sensorimotor blockade, hemodynamics, postoperative complications and postoperative analgesia. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the onset of sensorimotor block between the groups. The time to complete sensory and motor recovery was significantly prolonged in Group BD (P = 0.01 and P = 0.0001 respectively) as compared to Group BF. Both groups did not show significant differences in hemodynamic changes, but there was a reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressures ≥ 20% from baseline intraoperative. The VAS at 3 and 4 h postoperatively in the Group BD was significantly lower (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01 respectively). The incidence of complications was found comparable in two groups, except incidence of hypotension and nausea was more in the Group BD compared to Group BF (P = 0.006 and 0.002 respectively). Conclusion: Although intrathecal dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of sensory block, with comparable hemodynamic changes and good postoperative analgesia, prolonged motor block due to it, compared to intrathecal fentanyl, is not a desirable outcome particularly in short duration surgeries like LSCS, which can increase discharge time from post anesthesia care unit (PACU) to the ward. Abbreviations: LSCS: lower segment cesarean section; PACU: post anesthesia care unit; Citation: Urooj S, Mughal A, Shareef M, Naz A, Shah MU, Siddiqui SZ. Intrathecal bupivacaine-fentanyl vs. bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;26(5):616-622; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i5.2019  
剖宫产术鞘内布比卡因-芬太尼和布比卡因-右美托咪定:一项随机对照试验
背景与目的:脊髓麻醉是产科患者的首选技术,因为它经济,操作简单,起效快,并提供完全的肌肉放松。各种佐剂已被用于增强或延长其效果。我们比较右美托咪定和芬太尼对下段剖宫产术(LSCS)产妇感觉和运动阻滞的发生和恢复时间、血流动力学、术后并发症和术后镇痛时间的影响。研究方法:前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。将60例健康剖宫产患者随机分为两组。BD组给予布比卡因10 mg +右美托咪定5µg, BF组给予布比卡因10 mg +芬太尼10µg。观察产妇感觉运动阻滞、血流动力学、术后并发症及术后镇痛的发生及恢复时间。结果:两组间感觉运动阻滞发生率无统计学差异。与BF组相比,BD组完成感觉和运动恢复的时间明显延长(P = 0.01和P = 0.0001)。两组在血流动力学变化方面无显著差异,但术中收缩压和舒张压较基线降低≥20%。BD组术后3、4 h VAS评分明显低于对照组(P = 0.02、P = 0.01)。两组并发症发生率无明显差异,但BD组低血压和恶心发生率高于BF组(P分别为0.006和0.002)。结论:虽然鞘内右美托咪定延长了感觉阻滞的持续时间,血流动力学变化相当,术后镇痛效果良好,但与鞘内芬太尼相比,由于右美托咪定延长了运动阻滞的时间,这并不是一个理想的结果,特别是在像LSCS这样的短时间手术中,它会增加从麻醉后护理单位(PACU)到病房的出院时间。缩写:LSCS:下段剖宫产术;PACU:麻醉后护理病房;引用本文:urrooj S, Mughal A, Shareef M, Naz A, Shah MU, Siddiqui SZ。剖宫产术鞘内布比卡因-芬太尼vs布比卡因-右美托咪定:一项随机对照试验。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2022;26(5):616-622;DOI: 10.35975 / apic.v26i5.2019
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信