A Comparative Analysis of Feature Extraction Algorithms for Augmented Reality Applications

M. S. Alam, Malik Morshidi, T. Gunawan, R. F. Olanrewaju
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Feature Extraction Algorithms for Augmented Reality Applications","authors":"M. S. Alam, Malik Morshidi, T. Gunawan, R. F. Olanrewaju","doi":"10.1109/ICSIMA50015.2021.9526295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The algorithms based on image feature detection and matching are critical in the field of computer vision. Feature extraction and matching algorithms are used in many computer vision problems, including object recognition and structure from motion. Each feature detector and descriptor algorithm’s computational efficiency and robust performance have a major impact on image matching precision and time utilization. The performance of image matching algorithms that use expensive descriptors for detection and matching is addressed using existing approaches. The algorithm’s efficiency is measured by the number of matches found and the number of faults discovered when evaluated against a given pair of images. It also depends on the algorithm that detects the features and matches them in less amount of time. This paper examines and compares the different algorithm (SURF, ORB, BRISK, FAST, KAZE, MINEIGEN, MSER) performances using distinct parameters such as affine transformation, blur, scale, illumination, and rotation. The Oxford dataset is used to assess their robustness and efficiency against the parameters of interest. The time taken to detect features, the time taken to match images, the number of identified feature points, and the total running time is recorded in this study. The quantitative results show that the ORB and SURF algorithms detect and match more features than other algorithms. Furthermore, they are computationally less expensive and robust compared to other algorithms. In addition, the robustness of ORB and SURF is quite high in terms of outliers, and the amount of time taken to match with the reference is also significantly less. However, the efficiency of SURF reduces against blur transformation. FAST is good in detecting corners but lacks efficiency under different transformations. Experiments show that when each algorithm is subjected to numerous alterations, it has its own set of advantages and limitations.","PeriodicalId":404811,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA50015.2021.9526295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The algorithms based on image feature detection and matching are critical in the field of computer vision. Feature extraction and matching algorithms are used in many computer vision problems, including object recognition and structure from motion. Each feature detector and descriptor algorithm’s computational efficiency and robust performance have a major impact on image matching precision and time utilization. The performance of image matching algorithms that use expensive descriptors for detection and matching is addressed using existing approaches. The algorithm’s efficiency is measured by the number of matches found and the number of faults discovered when evaluated against a given pair of images. It also depends on the algorithm that detects the features and matches them in less amount of time. This paper examines and compares the different algorithm (SURF, ORB, BRISK, FAST, KAZE, MINEIGEN, MSER) performances using distinct parameters such as affine transformation, blur, scale, illumination, and rotation. The Oxford dataset is used to assess their robustness and efficiency against the parameters of interest. The time taken to detect features, the time taken to match images, the number of identified feature points, and the total running time is recorded in this study. The quantitative results show that the ORB and SURF algorithms detect and match more features than other algorithms. Furthermore, they are computationally less expensive and robust compared to other algorithms. In addition, the robustness of ORB and SURF is quite high in terms of outliers, and the amount of time taken to match with the reference is also significantly less. However, the efficiency of SURF reduces against blur transformation. FAST is good in detecting corners but lacks efficiency under different transformations. Experiments show that when each algorithm is subjected to numerous alterations, it has its own set of advantages and limitations.
增强现实应用中特征提取算法的比较分析
基于图像特征检测和匹配的算法是计算机视觉领域的关键。特征提取和匹配算法用于许多计算机视觉问题,包括物体识别和运动结构。每种特征检测器和描述子算法的计算效率和鲁棒性对图像匹配精度和时间利用率有重要影响。使用昂贵的描述符进行检测和匹配的图像匹配算法的性能使用现有的方法来解决。该算法的效率是通过对给定的一对图像进行评估时发现的匹配数量和发现的错误数量来衡量的。它还取决于检测特征并在更短的时间内匹配它们的算法。牛津数据集用于评估它们对感兴趣的参数的鲁棒性和效率。本研究记录了特征检测时间、图像匹配时间、识别出的特征点数量以及总运行时间。定量结果表明,ORB和SURF算法比其他算法检测和匹配的特征更多。此外,与其他算法相比,它们的计算成本更低,鲁棒性更强。此外,ORB和SURF的鲁棒性在离群值方面相当高,与参考匹配所需的时间也明显更少。然而,SURF在模糊变换时效率降低。FAST在拐角检测方面表现良好,但在不同变换条件下效率不高。实验表明,当每一种算法经过多次修改时,都有其自身的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信