Post-legalization Consumption of Cannabis at Massachusetts General Hospital Dental Group.

Samantha Parad, H. Hadad, H. Matheus, K. Klein, F. Guastaldi
{"title":"Post-legalization Consumption of Cannabis at Massachusetts General Hospital Dental Group.","authors":"Samantha Parad, H. Hadad, H. Matheus, K. Klein, F. Guastaldi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nThe aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of patients undergoing dental treatment in relation to cannabis use.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nA comprehensive questionnaire was used to address the type of cannabis preparations, route of intake, frequency of usage, and potential reasoning for use (recreational vs medical use) of patients from the MGH Dental Group.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSeventy-six adult patients completed the survey. Sixty-one percent of the participants were female, with the majority (59%) of the participants being ≥51 years or older. Twelve of the 76 participants (16%) were 18-30 years old. The remaining 19 patients (25%) who participated in the study were 31-50 years old. The sample included participants who were predominately non-Hispanic (63 patients, 83%) and White (59 patients, 78%). The majority of patients either had their first use of cannabis prior to 18 years of age (36%) or did not respond to this question (34%) at all. The predominant age at consistent cannabis use was 18-30 years (13%). The most common method of cannabis intake in the preceding year for participants was smoking, followed by ingesting, using cannabidiol (CBD), and vaping (least common). Recreational cannabis use was reported in 47% of the participants vs 28% of participants who reported cannabis intake for medical use.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis preliminary study characterized the profile of patients undergoing dental treatment in relation to marijuana use. Diminishing restraints to cannabis use may affect the dental profession.\n\n\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\nIt is important for dentists to understand cannabis-related oral health conditions to provide customized patient treatments.","PeriodicalId":225753,"journal":{"name":"The journal of contemporary dental practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of contemporary dental practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of patients undergoing dental treatment in relation to cannabis use. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive questionnaire was used to address the type of cannabis preparations, route of intake, frequency of usage, and potential reasoning for use (recreational vs medical use) of patients from the MGH Dental Group. RESULTS Seventy-six adult patients completed the survey. Sixty-one percent of the participants were female, with the majority (59%) of the participants being ≥51 years or older. Twelve of the 76 participants (16%) were 18-30 years old. The remaining 19 patients (25%) who participated in the study were 31-50 years old. The sample included participants who were predominately non-Hispanic (63 patients, 83%) and White (59 patients, 78%). The majority of patients either had their first use of cannabis prior to 18 years of age (36%) or did not respond to this question (34%) at all. The predominant age at consistent cannabis use was 18-30 years (13%). The most common method of cannabis intake in the preceding year for participants was smoking, followed by ingesting, using cannabidiol (CBD), and vaping (least common). Recreational cannabis use was reported in 47% of the participants vs 28% of participants who reported cannabis intake for medical use. CONCLUSION This preliminary study characterized the profile of patients undergoing dental treatment in relation to marijuana use. Diminishing restraints to cannabis use may affect the dental profession. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE It is important for dentists to understand cannabis-related oral health conditions to provide customized patient treatments.
麻州总医院牙科组大麻合法化后的消费情况。
目的:本研究的目的是评估接受牙科治疗的患者与大麻使用的关系。材料和方法采用一份全面的问卷调查来解决MGH牙科组患者的大麻制剂类型、摄入途径、使用频率和潜在使用原因(娱乐与医疗用途)。结果76例成人患者完成了调查。61%的参与者为女性,大多数(59%)参与者年龄≥51岁。76名参与者中有12人(16%)年龄在18-30岁之间。其余19例(25%)参与研究的患者年龄为31-50岁。样本包括主要是非西班牙裔(63例,83%)和白人(59例,78%)的参与者。大多数患者要么在18岁之前首次使用大麻(36%),要么根本没有回答这个问题(34%)。持续使用大麻的主要年龄为18-30岁(13%)。在过去的一年中,参与者最常见的大麻摄入方式是吸烟,其次是摄入、使用大麻二酚(CBD)和吸电子烟(最不常见)。47%的参与者报告使用娱乐性大麻,而28%的参与者报告使用大麻用于医疗用途。结论本初步研究描述了与大麻使用有关的牙科治疗患者的概况。减少对大麻使用的限制可能会影响牙科行业。临床意义了解与大麻相关的口腔健康状况对牙医提供个性化治疗具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信