A Comparative Study of Mathematical Models for Fractured Reservoirs: Anomalous Diffusion and Continuum Approach.

M. Karim, M. Hossain, Mahamudul Hashan, S. Imtiaz
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Mathematical Models for Fractured Reservoirs: Anomalous Diffusion and Continuum Approach.","authors":"M. Karim, M. Hossain, Mahamudul Hashan, S. Imtiaz","doi":"10.2118/191203-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study aims to determine an appropriate representative flow-model of a fractured reservoir after comparing two existing approaches: the anomalous diffusion and the continuum approach. A fractured reservoir is assumed in this paper that drains the fluid in transient condition, to a hydraulically fractured horizontal well. To investigate the comparison, dimensional consistency is maintained for both the anomalous diffusion and the continuum approach. Chen and Raghavan's (2015) model is considered as the anomalous diffusion model with modified boundary conditions. Continuum approach model considers the linear flow in a triple continuum structure that consists of matrix slab, micro-fracture, and hydraulic fracture. An analysis of the pressure response curves and the field data evaluates the proper approach for the analysis of the flow behavior. The solution of the wellbore pressure is derived in Laplace domain and is inverted by the Stehfest algorithm. Slope of the pressure response curve depends on the order of differentiation at the anomalous diffusion model. Conversely, the permeability of the hydraulic fracture controls the transient behavior at the continuum approach. The first set of analyses states that the continuum-based model considers the physical structure of the reservoir and increases the accuracy in the prediction of the reservoir behavior; however, more reservoir parameters are required for new continuum those are difficult to be determined. Alternatively, anomalous diffusion approach requires less parameter compare to the continuum approaches, but a high uncertainty exists in the precise determination of the order of the differentiation or the fractal exponent. The anomalous diffusion shows a good agreement with the synthesized field data at the early time whereas the continuum approach matches better at late time response.","PeriodicalId":352851,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, June 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191203-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to determine an appropriate representative flow-model of a fractured reservoir after comparing two existing approaches: the anomalous diffusion and the continuum approach. A fractured reservoir is assumed in this paper that drains the fluid in transient condition, to a hydraulically fractured horizontal well. To investigate the comparison, dimensional consistency is maintained for both the anomalous diffusion and the continuum approach. Chen and Raghavan's (2015) model is considered as the anomalous diffusion model with modified boundary conditions. Continuum approach model considers the linear flow in a triple continuum structure that consists of matrix slab, micro-fracture, and hydraulic fracture. An analysis of the pressure response curves and the field data evaluates the proper approach for the analysis of the flow behavior. The solution of the wellbore pressure is derived in Laplace domain and is inverted by the Stehfest algorithm. Slope of the pressure response curve depends on the order of differentiation at the anomalous diffusion model. Conversely, the permeability of the hydraulic fracture controls the transient behavior at the continuum approach. The first set of analyses states that the continuum-based model considers the physical structure of the reservoir and increases the accuracy in the prediction of the reservoir behavior; however, more reservoir parameters are required for new continuum those are difficult to be determined. Alternatively, anomalous diffusion approach requires less parameter compare to the continuum approaches, but a high uncertainty exists in the precise determination of the order of the differentiation or the fractal exponent. The anomalous diffusion shows a good agreement with the synthesized field data at the early time whereas the continuum approach matches better at late time response.
裂缝性储层数学模型的比较研究:异常扩散与连续体方法。
本研究旨在通过对比现有的两种方法:异常扩散方法和连续介质方法,确定一个合适的裂缝性油藏的代表性流动模型。本文假设有一裂缝性储层,流体处于暂态状态,向水力压裂水平井中泄放。为了进行比较,对异常扩散和连续介质方法都保持了尺寸一致性。Chen和Raghavan(2015)的模型被认为是带有修正边界条件的异常扩散模型。连续介质方法模型考虑了由基质板、微裂缝和水力裂缝组成的三重连续介质结构中的线性流动。通过对压力响应曲线和现场数据的分析,对流动特性分析的合适方法进行了评价。在Laplace域中推导了井筒压力的解,并用Stehfest算法进行了反演。压力响应曲线的斜率取决于异常扩散模式下的微分阶数。相反,水力裂缝的渗透率控制着连续介质的瞬态行为。第一组分析表明,基于连续体的模型考虑了储层的物理结构,提高了储层动态预测的准确性;然而,新的连续体需要更多的储层参数,这些参数很难确定。与连续介质法相比,异常扩散法需要较少的参数,但在精确确定分形指数或微分阶数时存在很大的不确定性。异常扩散方法在早期与现场综合数据吻合较好,而连续统方法在后期响应中吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信