Arc Conductance and Contact Erosion in Liquid Nitrogen under DC Current Interruption

Hongxu Li, B. Xiang, M. Junaid, Yingsan Geng, Zhiyuan Liu, Jianhua Wang
{"title":"Arc Conductance and Contact Erosion in Liquid Nitrogen under DC Current Interruption","authors":"Hongxu Li, B. Xiang, M. Junaid, Yingsan Geng, Zhiyuan Liu, Jianhua Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICEPE-ST.2019.8928670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous Studies showed that liquid nitrogen (LN2) has good insulating properties and reseasonable DC current breaking performance. However, there is still no research on arc conductance of liquid nitrogen and on contact erosion in DC current interruption. The objective of this paper is to understand the arc conductance of LN2 and the contact erosion in DC current interruption. Air arc was also studied as a benchmark. DC Current of 110-210 A were applied, which is initiated by a C-L-R discharging. Butt type contacts were chosen. The contact diameter was 25 mm and the contact gaps were 20 mm. Two kinds of contact materials were chosen, which were pure copper and tungsten copper, respectively. A drawn arc was initiated. The average opening velocity was 0.6 m/s. Experimental results showed the arc conductance during arcing in LN2 and in air. In successful breaking, the arc conductance declined to zero quickly without a \"plateau\" before current zero. While in failed breaking, there was a \"plateau\" after a quick decline of the arc conductance. The plateau of the arc conductance increased from 0.3 S to 1.3 S when the current increased from 185 to 210 A. Arc conductance in LN2 was approximatley two-thirds of that in air.The contact erosion area in LN2 was nearly half of that in air after arcing, while depth of erosion was nearly the same. SEM photos revealed that the droplet-like metal balls on the contact surfaces in LN2 were much higher than that in air, which implied the contact surface after arcing in LN2 was rougher than in air.","PeriodicalId":392306,"journal":{"name":"2019 5th International Conference on Electric Power Equipment - Switching Technology (ICEPE-ST)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 5th International Conference on Electric Power Equipment - Switching Technology (ICEPE-ST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE-ST.2019.8928670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous Studies showed that liquid nitrogen (LN2) has good insulating properties and reseasonable DC current breaking performance. However, there is still no research on arc conductance of liquid nitrogen and on contact erosion in DC current interruption. The objective of this paper is to understand the arc conductance of LN2 and the contact erosion in DC current interruption. Air arc was also studied as a benchmark. DC Current of 110-210 A were applied, which is initiated by a C-L-R discharging. Butt type contacts were chosen. The contact diameter was 25 mm and the contact gaps were 20 mm. Two kinds of contact materials were chosen, which were pure copper and tungsten copper, respectively. A drawn arc was initiated. The average opening velocity was 0.6 m/s. Experimental results showed the arc conductance during arcing in LN2 and in air. In successful breaking, the arc conductance declined to zero quickly without a "plateau" before current zero. While in failed breaking, there was a "plateau" after a quick decline of the arc conductance. The plateau of the arc conductance increased from 0.3 S to 1.3 S when the current increased from 185 to 210 A. Arc conductance in LN2 was approximatley two-thirds of that in air.The contact erosion area in LN2 was nearly half of that in air after arcing, while depth of erosion was nearly the same. SEM photos revealed that the droplet-like metal balls on the contact surfaces in LN2 were much higher than that in air, which implied the contact surface after arcing in LN2 was rougher than in air.
直流电流中断下液氮的电弧电导和接触侵蚀
前人的研究表明,液氮(LN2)具有良好的绝缘性能和合理的直流分断性能。然而,液氮的电弧电导和直流断流过程中触点侵蚀的研究尚缺乏。本文的目的是了解LN2的电弧电导和直流电流中断时的触点侵蚀。空气弧也作为基准进行了研究。直流电流为110-210 A,由C-L-R放电启动。选择对接型触点。接触直径为25 mm,接触间隙为20 mm。选择两种触点材料,分别为纯铜和钨铜。一个绘制的弧被启动。平均开启速度为0.6 m/s。实验结果显示了在LN2和空气中电弧的电导。在成功断开时,电弧电导迅速下降到零,在电流为零之前没有“平台”。断弧失败时,电弧电导迅速下降后出现“平台期”。当电流从185 A增加到210 A时,电弧电导的平台从0.3 S增加到1.3 S。LN2中的电弧电导约为空气中的三分之二。电弧形成后,LN2中的接触侵蚀面积几乎是空气中的一半,而侵蚀深度几乎相同。SEM照片显示,在LN2中接触表面上的液滴状金属球比在空气中要高得多,这表明在LN2中电弧后的接触表面比在空气中粗糙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信