Identification of Partial Discharge Fault Type and Sensitivity Analysis of Joint Detection Based on Clustering Algorithm

Q. Feng, Zhenhua Shao
{"title":"Identification of Partial Discharge Fault Type and Sensitivity Analysis of Joint Detection Based on Clustering Algorithm","authors":"Q. Feng, Zhenhua Shao","doi":"10.1109/AIAM54119.2021.00079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Partial discharge (PD) is the initial manifestation of insulation deterioration in power equipment. When PD accumulates to a certain extent, it will lead to equipment damage. PD detection in advance is an effective method to prevent insulation deterioration. In this paper, AE method, TEV method and UHF method are used to study the internal discharge, suspension discharge and surface discharge respectively, pointing out the limitations of a single detection method, and using clustering method to extract the discharge characteristic parameters of different defect types to classify. The results of K-means clustering show that the accuracy of internal discharge is 83%, surface discharge is 65%, and suspension discharge is 66%. FCM clustering results show that the accuracy of internal discharge is 63%, surface discharge is 60%, and suspension discharge is 50%. The results of hierarchical clustering show that the accuracy of internal discharge is 73%, surface discharge is 70%, and suspension discharge is 67%. From the perspective of sensitivity, TEV method has the highest sensitivity, AE method and UHF method have their advantages in the sensitivity of different discharge defects. In order to overcome the limitation of a single detection method, combined with the experimental results and the actual noise interference and local location requirements, the application of multi-means combined detection is analyzed to provide some reference for the selection of joint detection method. UHF/AE method can avoid electromagnetic interference. UHF/TEV method can avoid acoustic interference; TEV/AE method can improve the localization accuracy.","PeriodicalId":227320,"journal":{"name":"2021 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacture (AIAM)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacture (AIAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIAM54119.2021.00079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partial discharge (PD) is the initial manifestation of insulation deterioration in power equipment. When PD accumulates to a certain extent, it will lead to equipment damage. PD detection in advance is an effective method to prevent insulation deterioration. In this paper, AE method, TEV method and UHF method are used to study the internal discharge, suspension discharge and surface discharge respectively, pointing out the limitations of a single detection method, and using clustering method to extract the discharge characteristic parameters of different defect types to classify. The results of K-means clustering show that the accuracy of internal discharge is 83%, surface discharge is 65%, and suspension discharge is 66%. FCM clustering results show that the accuracy of internal discharge is 63%, surface discharge is 60%, and suspension discharge is 50%. The results of hierarchical clustering show that the accuracy of internal discharge is 73%, surface discharge is 70%, and suspension discharge is 67%. From the perspective of sensitivity, TEV method has the highest sensitivity, AE method and UHF method have their advantages in the sensitivity of different discharge defects. In order to overcome the limitation of a single detection method, combined with the experimental results and the actual noise interference and local location requirements, the application of multi-means combined detection is analyzed to provide some reference for the selection of joint detection method. UHF/AE method can avoid electromagnetic interference. UHF/TEV method can avoid acoustic interference; TEV/AE method can improve the localization accuracy.
基于聚类算法的局部放电故障类型识别及联合检测灵敏度分析
局部放电是电力设备绝缘劣化的初始表现。当PD积累到一定程度时,会导致设备损坏。PD提前检测是防止绝缘劣化的有效方法。本文采用声发射法、TEV法和UHF法分别对内部放电、悬浮放电和表面放电进行研究,指出单一检测方法的局限性,并采用聚类方法提取不同缺陷类型的放电特征参数进行分类。K-means聚类结果表明,内部放电的准确率为83%,表面放电的准确率为65%,悬浮放电的准确率为66%。FCM聚类结果表明,内部放电精度为63%,表面放电精度为60%,悬浮放电精度为50%。分层聚类结果表明,内部放电准确率为73%,表面放电准确率为70%,悬浮放电准确率为67%。从灵敏度上看,TEV法灵敏度最高,AE法和UHF法在不同放电缺陷的灵敏度上各有优势。为了克服单一检测方法的局限性,结合实验结果和实际噪声干扰及局部定位要求,对多手段组合检测的应用进行了分析,为联合检测方法的选择提供一定的参考。UHF/AE方法可以避免电磁干扰。UHF/TEV方法可以避免声干扰;TEV/AE方法可以提高定位精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信