"BETTER HOPE, LESS DEPRESSED": THE POTENTIAL MEDIATING ROLE OF PATHWAYS THINKING BETWEEN NEGATIVE EMOTIONS AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS AMONG CHINESE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Stephen C Y Chan, Qingbo Huang
{"title":"\"BETTER HOPE, LESS DEPRESSED\": THE POTENTIAL MEDIATING ROLE OF PATHWAYS THINKING BETWEEN NEGATIVE EMOTIONS AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS AMONG CHINESE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS","authors":"Stephen C Y Chan, Qingbo Huang","doi":"10.1142/s0219246222000031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depression is a significant public health issue, particularly in young adults of university age, and it is important to explore a protective factor to minimize the adverse effects of negative emotions. This study examined the mediating role of two hope components, agency thinking and pathways thinking, in the association between negative emotions and depressive symptoms in university students. Three hundred and fifteen Chinese undergraduates (211 females and 104 males) participated in this study (mean age = 22.08 years; SD = 2.74). The participants were invited to complete a self-administered online questionnaire measuring negative emotions, hope and depressive symptoms. In terms of bootstrapped mediation testing, the results indicated that negative emotions were partially associated with depressive symptoms through pathways thinking, but not agency thinking. These findings consolidate the complex nature of hope, and suggest that hope (through pathways thinking in particular) can be a protective factor in terms of university students' psychological outcomes. Possible explanations and clinical implications of our findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":328832,"journal":{"name":"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219246222000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Depression is a significant public health issue, particularly in young adults of university age, and it is important to explore a protective factor to minimize the adverse effects of negative emotions. This study examined the mediating role of two hope components, agency thinking and pathways thinking, in the association between negative emotions and depressive symptoms in university students. Three hundred and fifteen Chinese undergraduates (211 females and 104 males) participated in this study (mean age = 22.08 years; SD = 2.74). The participants were invited to complete a self-administered online questionnaire measuring negative emotions, hope and depressive symptoms. In terms of bootstrapped mediation testing, the results indicated that negative emotions were partially associated with depressive symptoms through pathways thinking, but not agency thinking. These findings consolidate the complex nature of hope, and suggest that hope (through pathways thinking in particular) can be a protective factor in terms of university students' psychological outcomes. Possible explanations and clinical implications of our findings are discussed.
“多一点希望,少一点沮丧”:路径思维在大学生负性情绪与抑郁症状之间的潜在中介作用
抑郁症是一个重要的公共卫生问题,特别是在大学年龄的年轻人中,探索一种保护因素以尽量减少负面情绪的不利影响是很重要的。本研究考察了代理思维和路径思维这两个希望成分在大学生消极情绪与抑郁症状之间的中介作用。315名中国大学生(女211名,男104名)参与本研究,平均年龄22.08岁;Sd = 2.74)。参与者被邀请完成一份自我管理的在线问卷,测量负面情绪、希望和抑郁症状。在自举中介检验方面,结果表明消极情绪通过路径思维与抑郁症状部分相关,而不通过代理思维与抑郁症状部分相关。这些发现巩固了希望的复杂性,并表明希望(特别是通过路径思维)可以成为大学生心理结果的保护因素。本文还讨论了本研究结果的可能解释和临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信