"Cognitive PNF" to implement adolescent muscle-tendon flexibility

Francesca Siano, Matteo Aquino, Simona Fattore
{"title":"\"Cognitive PNF\" to implement adolescent muscle-tendon flexibility","authors":"Francesca Siano, Matteo Aquino, Simona Fattore","doi":"10.14198/JHSE.2021.16.PROC4.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to evaluate the significance of concept of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation \" Cognitive PNF \" training in increasing muscle-tendon flexibility over the course of 4 weeks (8 training sessions) in a group of 10 participants aged between 13 and 14 years old, comparing it with another group of 10 participants of the same age, subjected instead to 8 sessions of static stretching. The 20 participants underwent a series of entrance tests, in order to identify the level of flexibility and relative joint mobility of the hip, lumbar spine and shoulder joints: Thomas test, hip extension test, lumbar spine flexion, shoulder range test. Subsequently, through the flexibility index, a lack of flexibility in the participants emerged. The statistical model used for both samples is the T-Test for dependent samples. In the control group, the value of the Stat t (-1.17) falls within the acceptance region which is given by the two-tailed critical t (-2.30; 2.30), therefore, the difference between two averages is not significant. In the experimental group, the value of the Stat t (-5.73) falls outside the acceptance region which is given by the two-tailed critical t (-2.26; 2.26), in other words, in the rejection region rejecting the null hypothesis which states that the difference between the two averages is not significant.","PeriodicalId":166047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2021 - Spring Conferences of Sports Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2021 - Spring Conferences of Sports Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/JHSE.2021.16.PROC4.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the significance of concept of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation " Cognitive PNF " training in increasing muscle-tendon flexibility over the course of 4 weeks (8 training sessions) in a group of 10 participants aged between 13 and 14 years old, comparing it with another group of 10 participants of the same age, subjected instead to 8 sessions of static stretching. The 20 participants underwent a series of entrance tests, in order to identify the level of flexibility and relative joint mobility of the hip, lumbar spine and shoulder joints: Thomas test, hip extension test, lumbar spine flexion, shoulder range test. Subsequently, through the flexibility index, a lack of flexibility in the participants emerged. The statistical model used for both samples is the T-Test for dependent samples. In the control group, the value of the Stat t (-1.17) falls within the acceptance region which is given by the two-tailed critical t (-2.30; 2.30), therefore, the difference between two averages is not significant. In the experimental group, the value of the Stat t (-5.73) falls outside the acceptance region which is given by the two-tailed critical t (-2.26; 2.26), in other words, in the rejection region rejecting the null hypothesis which states that the difference between the two averages is not significant.
“认知PNF”实现青少年肌肉肌腱柔韧性
本研究的目的是评估本体感觉神经肌肉促进“认知PNF”训练概念在增加13 - 14岁的一组10名参与者的4周(8次训练)中肌肉肌腱柔韧性的意义,并将其与另一组10名同龄参与者进行8次静态拉伸进行比较。20名参与者接受了一系列的入门测试,以确定髋关节、腰椎和肩部关节的灵活性和相对关节活动度:托马斯测试、髋关节伸展测试、腰椎屈曲测试、肩部范围测试。随后,通过灵活性指数,发现参与者缺乏灵活性。这两个样本使用的统计模型是依赖样本的t检验。在对照组中,Stat(-1.17)的值落在由双尾临界t (-2.30;2.30),因此,两个平均值之间的差异不显著。在实验组中,Stat(-5.73)的值落在由双尾临界t (-2.26;2.26),换句话说,在拒绝区域拒绝零假设,即两个平均值之间的差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信