Video analysis of throwing techniques in Collegiate Shot-Put athletes: A visual exploration of throwing styles and performance factors

M. Anusha, Vinod Kumar Kanakapura Chananke Gowda, S. Subramanian, Yasmeen Imtiaz, Arul Pragassame, M. Subramanian, Naresh Bhaskar Raj, Saira Afzal, Majed Albadi, R. A. Gaowgzeh
{"title":"Video analysis of throwing techniques in Collegiate Shot-Put athletes: A visual exploration of throwing styles and performance factors","authors":"M. Anusha, Vinod Kumar Kanakapura Chananke Gowda, S. Subramanian, Yasmeen Imtiaz, Arul Pragassame, M. Subramanian, Naresh Bhaskar Raj, Saira Afzal, Majed Albadi, R. A. Gaowgzeh","doi":"10.52756/ijerr.2023.v32.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study delves into the realm of collegiate shot-put athletes' throwing techniques, aiming to undertake a comprehensive comparative video analysis of various throwing styles. The primary objective is to visually explore these athletes' diverse throwing techniques and shed light on the critical performance factors associated with each style. By employing video analysis tools and techniques, this research intends to provide a detailed examination of the biomechanical nuances and body movements in different throwing methods. Through an extensive collection of video footage featuring collegiate shot-put athletes, the study will meticulously dissect and compare the variations in throwing techniques. The aim is to analyse the different types of throwing techniques used and the technique that produces the best result by collegiate shot-put athletes in and around Bangalore. 220 shot-put athletes of age group between 18-25 years, representing colleges from different Universities were approached to analyse their shot-put throwing technique with two high-definition cameras and analysed using Kinovea software. The mean rank for velocity was higher in the glide technique for both male and female athletes compared to the rotational technique. Male athletes with higher BMI used rotational technique in comparison to athletes with lower BMI, in female athletes with higher BMI used glide technique in comparison to athletes with lower BMI (p-0.0001.) Based on the results obtained from our study, the glide technique was the most prevalent technique used by collegiate athletes. The gliding technique showed better throwing distance than the rotational technique. The findings of this study hold the potential to offer valuable insights to coaches, athletes, and researchers in the field of shot-put training and sports biomechanics. The comparative video analysis approach provides a unique visual perspective that supplements the existing body of knowledge concerning shot put techniques.","PeriodicalId":190842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Experimental Research and Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Experimental Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2023.v32.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study delves into the realm of collegiate shot-put athletes' throwing techniques, aiming to undertake a comprehensive comparative video analysis of various throwing styles. The primary objective is to visually explore these athletes' diverse throwing techniques and shed light on the critical performance factors associated with each style. By employing video analysis tools and techniques, this research intends to provide a detailed examination of the biomechanical nuances and body movements in different throwing methods. Through an extensive collection of video footage featuring collegiate shot-put athletes, the study will meticulously dissect and compare the variations in throwing techniques. The aim is to analyse the different types of throwing techniques used and the technique that produces the best result by collegiate shot-put athletes in and around Bangalore. 220 shot-put athletes of age group between 18-25 years, representing colleges from different Universities were approached to analyse their shot-put throwing technique with two high-definition cameras and analysed using Kinovea software. The mean rank for velocity was higher in the glide technique for both male and female athletes compared to the rotational technique. Male athletes with higher BMI used rotational technique in comparison to athletes with lower BMI, in female athletes with higher BMI used glide technique in comparison to athletes with lower BMI (p-0.0001.) Based on the results obtained from our study, the glide technique was the most prevalent technique used by collegiate athletes. The gliding technique showed better throwing distance than the rotational technique. The findings of this study hold the potential to offer valuable insights to coaches, athletes, and researchers in the field of shot-put training and sports biomechanics. The comparative video analysis approach provides a unique visual perspective that supplements the existing body of knowledge concerning shot put techniques.
大学铅球运动员投掷技术录像分析:投掷风格与表现因素的视觉探索
本研究以大学铅球运动员的投掷技术为研究对象,旨在对各种投掷方式进行全面的录像对比分析。主要目的是直观地探索这些运动员的各种投掷技术,并阐明与每种风格相关的关键性能因素。通过使用视频分析工具和技术,本研究旨在提供不同投掷方法的生物力学细微差别和身体运动的详细检查。通过大量收集大学铅球运动员的录像片段,这项研究将细致地剖析和比较投掷技术的变化。目的是分析不同类型的投掷技术的使用和技术,产生最好的结果在班加罗尔和周边地区的大学铅球运动员。220名年龄在18-25岁之间的铅球运动员,代表来自不同大学的学院接近分析他们的铅球投掷技术用两个高清摄像机和Kinovea软件进行分析。与旋转技术相比,男女运动员在滑翔技术中速度的平均排名都更高。BMI较高的男性运动员比BMI较低的运动员使用旋转技术,BMI较高的女性运动员比BMI较低的运动员使用滑行技术(p-0.0001)。根据我们的研究结果,滑行技术是大学生运动员使用的最普遍的技术。滑行技术比旋转技术投掷距离好。这项研究的发现有可能为铅球训练和运动生物力学领域的教练、运动员和研究人员提供有价值的见解。对比视频分析方法提供了一个独特的视觉视角,补充了现有的铅球技术知识体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信