Pandemic as a Metaphor for Moral Degeneration in Tagore’s Rajarshi

Ananya Chatterjee
{"title":"Pandemic as a Metaphor for Moral Degeneration in Tagore’s Rajarshi","authors":"Ananya Chatterjee","doi":"10.48189/nl.2021.v02i2.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shall unpack the Pandemic by reading the metaphor of moral degradation that gets regularly associated with disease and death. Tagore’s novel contemplates this metaphorical association and undoes it by locating human agency outside of naturalized morality. The paper establishes Tagore’s modernist understanding of human agency and responsibility through two characters – Gobindamanikya and Bilwan. The protagonist, Gobindamanikya, exemplifies Tagore’s personal form of Virtue ethics, whereas in Bilwan we see a more practical equivalent of that Virtue ethics in the form of an ethics of care. A formidable opposition to their ethical positions is provided by the character of Raghupati, who invokes the natural order to establish a deontological view of reality. Within this naturalistic deontological worldview, calamities like the pandemic become almost an agreeable occurrence, thus testing the validity of both the positions of Bilwan and Gobindamanikya. By looking at the thanatopolitics of the pandemic situation in the Indian subcontinent, this paper will analyse the assumptions about moral degeneration that cropped up during an epidemic in Tripura. The absence of a mature understanding of the human-nature relation results in conflicting moral stances on both the individual level and between two different religious communities. The paper will explain how the central characters stage a denaturalization of traditional authority through the moral intervention of the central characters. Tagore’s novel establishes a mature vintage point from which humanitarian action can be conducted in the event of an epidemic or pandemic.","PeriodicalId":205595,"journal":{"name":"New Literaria","volume":"7981 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2021.v02i2.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper shall unpack the Pandemic by reading the metaphor of moral degradation that gets regularly associated with disease and death. Tagore’s novel contemplates this metaphorical association and undoes it by locating human agency outside of naturalized morality. The paper establishes Tagore’s modernist understanding of human agency and responsibility through two characters – Gobindamanikya and Bilwan. The protagonist, Gobindamanikya, exemplifies Tagore’s personal form of Virtue ethics, whereas in Bilwan we see a more practical equivalent of that Virtue ethics in the form of an ethics of care. A formidable opposition to their ethical positions is provided by the character of Raghupati, who invokes the natural order to establish a deontological view of reality. Within this naturalistic deontological worldview, calamities like the pandemic become almost an agreeable occurrence, thus testing the validity of both the positions of Bilwan and Gobindamanikya. By looking at the thanatopolitics of the pandemic situation in the Indian subcontinent, this paper will analyse the assumptions about moral degeneration that cropped up during an epidemic in Tripura. The absence of a mature understanding of the human-nature relation results in conflicting moral stances on both the individual level and between two different religious communities. The paper will explain how the central characters stage a denaturalization of traditional authority through the moral intervention of the central characters. Tagore’s novel establishes a mature vintage point from which humanitarian action can be conducted in the event of an epidemic or pandemic.
泰戈尔《拉贾什》中对道德堕落的隐喻——流行病
本文将通过解读经常与疾病和死亡联系在一起的道德退化的隐喻来揭示大流行。泰戈尔的小说思考了这种隐喻的联系,并通过将人类的能动性置于自然化的道德之外来消解它。本文通过戈宾达曼尼亚和比尔万这两个人物,确立了泰戈尔对人的能动性和责任的现代主义理解。主人公Gobindamanikya,体现了泰戈尔个人形式的美德伦理,而在比尔万中,我们看到了更实际的美德伦理,以关怀伦理的形式。拉古帕蒂(Raghupati)的角色为他们的伦理立场提供了强大的反对意见,他援引自然秩序来建立对现实的义务论观点。在这种自然主义的义务论世界观中,像大流行病这样的灾难几乎成为一件令人愉快的事情,从而检验了比尔万和戈宾达曼尼亚的立场是否正确。通过观察印度次大陆流行病形势的死亡政治,本文将分析关于特里普拉流行病期间出现的道德退化的假设。由于缺乏对人与自然关系的成熟理解,导致在个人层面和两个不同宗教团体之间的道德立场相互冲突。本文将解释中心人物如何通过中心人物的道德干预来实现传统权威的变性。泰戈尔的小说建立了一个成熟的复古点,在流行病或大流行的情况下,人道主义行动可以从这个点进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信