Harmonization Of State Administrative Court Law And Other Laws Concerning The State Administrative Courts Exclusive Authority

Nurwigati Nurwigati
{"title":"Harmonization Of State Administrative Court Law And Other Laws Concerning The State Administrative Courts Exclusive Authority","authors":"Nurwigati Nurwigati","doi":"10.20885/plr.vol4.iss2.art6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study describes and analyzes the urgency of harmonizing the exclusive authority of State Administrative Court as stipulated in the State Administrative Court Law and Non-State Administrative Court Law, and how to do this harmonization in relation to the implementation of legality principles, the theory of hierarchical regulations, and laws on the establishment of laws and regulations. As normative research using statutory and conceptual approaches, this research used a descriptive qualitative analytical method. It is expected that the results of this research can contribute to the development of Constitutional law and State Administrative Law, as well as to contribute ideas to policymakers in making and formulating various regulations related to appropriate methods to overcome disharmony in regulating the exclusive authority of the State Administrative Court to ensure that the law issued on the exclusive authority of the State Administrative Court meets society’s needs for good laws and regulations. This study concluded the following points: first, it is necessary to harmonize the State Administrative Court Law and laws other than State Administrative Court on the exclusive authority of the State Administrative Court to avoid any overlap to ensure harmonization of the laws. Secondly, the usual drafting method is more appropriate than the omnibus method because we only need to amend the State Administrative Court Law, while the other laws remain unamended.","PeriodicalId":330493,"journal":{"name":"Prophetic Law Review","volume":"17 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prophetic Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/plr.vol4.iss2.art6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study describes and analyzes the urgency of harmonizing the exclusive authority of State Administrative Court as stipulated in the State Administrative Court Law and Non-State Administrative Court Law, and how to do this harmonization in relation to the implementation of legality principles, the theory of hierarchical regulations, and laws on the establishment of laws and regulations. As normative research using statutory and conceptual approaches, this research used a descriptive qualitative analytical method. It is expected that the results of this research can contribute to the development of Constitutional law and State Administrative Law, as well as to contribute ideas to policymakers in making and formulating various regulations related to appropriate methods to overcome disharmony in regulating the exclusive authority of the State Administrative Court to ensure that the law issued on the exclusive authority of the State Administrative Court meets society’s needs for good laws and regulations. This study concluded the following points: first, it is necessary to harmonize the State Administrative Court Law and laws other than State Administrative Court on the exclusive authority of the State Administrative Court to avoid any overlap to ensure harmonization of the laws. Secondly, the usual drafting method is more appropriate than the omnibus method because we only need to amend the State Administrative Court Law, while the other laws remain unamended.
国家行政法院法律与其他有关国家行政法院专有权的法律的协调
本研究从法制化原则的实施、层级规制理论、法律法规的制定等方面阐述和分析了《国家行政法院法》和《非国家行政法院法》中规定的国家行政法院专有权的协调紧迫性,以及如何协调国家行政法院专有权。作为使用法定和概念方法的规范性研究,本研究使用了描述性定性分析方法。希望本文的研究成果能够为我国宪法和国家行政法的发展做出贡献,并为政策制定者制定和制定各种法规提供思路,以适当的方式克服国家行政法院排他性权力规制中的不和谐,确保国家行政法院排他性权力颁布的法律能够满足社会对良好法律法规的需求。本研究得出以下几点结论:第一,有必要协调国家行政法院法律与国家行政法院以外的法律对国家行政法院的专属权限,以避免任何重叠,以确保法律的协调。其次,通常的起草方法比综合法更合适,因为我们只需要修改《国家行政法院法》,而其他法律保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信