Is the Tax System Beyond Reform?

G. Yin
{"title":"Is the Tax System Beyond Reform?","authors":"G. Yin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.893888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immediately after the 1994 election giving the Republicans control of the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years, Congressman Bill Archer (R., Tex.), who was in line to become the new chairman of the House tax-writing committee, announced his intention to abandon the income tax system altogether. According to Archer, the current system is too broken to be fixed and therefore needed to be replaced with something completely different, such as a national retail sales tax.This paper first explains why a national sales tax is not a viable alternative as a complete replacement for the income tax. Although Archer retired from the Congress after the 2000 election without having made any progress on his objective, subsequent events have made clear the continuing interest in this plan. The paper describes and analyzes H.R. 25, a bill to replace all income, payroll, and estate and gifts taxes with a national sales tax. This proposal was recently popularized in a book entitled, The FairTax Book: Saying Goodbye to the Income Tax and the IRS, authored by Neal Boortz and Congressman John Linder, the lead sponsor of H.R. 25.Second, the paper explains why Archer's pessimism about reforming the income tax may be well placed, although perhaps not for the reasons he had in mind. The paper explains why the current legislative process is not conducive to enacting the type of amendments necessary for real tax reform.","PeriodicalId":297504,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.893888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Immediately after the 1994 election giving the Republicans control of the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years, Congressman Bill Archer (R., Tex.), who was in line to become the new chairman of the House tax-writing committee, announced his intention to abandon the income tax system altogether. According to Archer, the current system is too broken to be fixed and therefore needed to be replaced with something completely different, such as a national retail sales tax.This paper first explains why a national sales tax is not a viable alternative as a complete replacement for the income tax. Although Archer retired from the Congress after the 2000 election without having made any progress on his objective, subsequent events have made clear the continuing interest in this plan. The paper describes and analyzes H.R. 25, a bill to replace all income, payroll, and estate and gifts taxes with a national sales tax. This proposal was recently popularized in a book entitled, The FairTax Book: Saying Goodbye to the Income Tax and the IRS, authored by Neal Boortz and Congressman John Linder, the lead sponsor of H.R. 25.Second, the paper explains why Archer's pessimism about reforming the income tax may be well placed, although perhaps not for the reasons he had in mind. The paper explains why the current legislative process is not conducive to enacting the type of amendments necessary for real tax reform.
税收制度是否无法改革?
在1994年的选举中,共和党人40年来首次控制了美国众议院,即将成为众议院税收起草委员会新主席的德克萨斯州共和党众议员比尔•阿彻(Bill Archer)立即宣布,他打算完全放弃所得税制度。据阿彻说,目前的制度已经支离破碎,无法修复,因此需要用完全不同的东西来取代,比如全国零售销售税。本文首先解释了为什么全国销售税不是完全替代所得税的可行选择。虽然阿彻在2000年大选后从国会退休,但他的目标没有取得任何进展,但随后发生的事件表明,人们对这一计划的兴趣仍在继续。本文描述并分析了H.R. 25法案,该法案将用全国销售税取代所有的所得税、工资税、遗产税和赠与税。这一提议最近在一本名为《公平税收书:告别所得税和国税局》的书中得到了普及,这本书的作者是尼尔·布尔茨和国会议员约翰·林德,他是H.R. 25法案的主要发起人。其次,这篇论文解释了为什么阿彻对所得税改革的悲观情绪可能是正确的,尽管可能不是出于他所想的原因。本文解释了为什么目前的立法程序不利于制定真正的税收改革所必需的修正案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信