Maximizing Productivity Index by Minimizing Fluid, Proppant and Additive Volumes

J. Rueda, Abdullah Alzamil, Abdulrahman Alowaid, J. Valbuena, Rashed Alnaimi
{"title":"Maximizing Productivity Index by Minimizing Fluid, Proppant and Additive Volumes","authors":"J. Rueda, Abdullah Alzamil, Abdulrahman Alowaid, J. Valbuena, Rashed Alnaimi","doi":"10.2118/213271-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As part of the stimulation plan to obtain the optimum slickwater frac design in the main source rock play in Saudi Arabia, a series of systematic trials were carried out testing different frac design parameters, such as the proppant volumes and types, and fluid & additives volumes (friction reducers, spearhead acid etc.). These trials were carefully designed in several 4-well pads across the field, comparing different designs in wells next to each other in the same pad, to allow consistency in reservoir and geology conditions allowing the trials to be conclusive. Wells were flowed back for a relatively short period of time and different production analysis techniques were used to compare the different designs against the standard.\n In this paper, the Normalized Initial Productivity Index of the wells was compared using the Gas, Gas Equivalent, Total Fluid Downhole Flow Rates Productivity Index (PI), and the Effective Fracture Lengths from rate transient analysis were used to help on selecting the optimum frac designs. In these trials, other important completion parameters were kept constant: the number of clusters per stage, cluster spacing, type of perforation guns, frac fluid and proppant type. The flowrates are measured using the three phase separators and the corresponding bottom-hole flowing pressures are estimated using multi-phase flow parameters, and the matched wellbore hydraulic models. The reservoir pressure is estimated from the pressure decline analysis of the frac stages along the lateral.\n The results show that there was almost no change in the productivity results by lowering the proppant volumes 25%. The results also show that better wells are obtained by lowering fluid volumes by 33% and decreasing the additive volumes by more than 75%. Overall, the improved PI obtained with lower proppant and fluid volumes and less additive concentrations, provided an optimized frac design that is being carried into the development phase wells.\n This paper helps in understanding and maximizing the productivity of the wells and optimizing the design including chemicals, to capitalize the value generation from the individual wells on the multi-well pads.","PeriodicalId":249245,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213271-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of the stimulation plan to obtain the optimum slickwater frac design in the main source rock play in Saudi Arabia, a series of systematic trials were carried out testing different frac design parameters, such as the proppant volumes and types, and fluid & additives volumes (friction reducers, spearhead acid etc.). These trials were carefully designed in several 4-well pads across the field, comparing different designs in wells next to each other in the same pad, to allow consistency in reservoir and geology conditions allowing the trials to be conclusive. Wells were flowed back for a relatively short period of time and different production analysis techniques were used to compare the different designs against the standard. In this paper, the Normalized Initial Productivity Index of the wells was compared using the Gas, Gas Equivalent, Total Fluid Downhole Flow Rates Productivity Index (PI), and the Effective Fracture Lengths from rate transient analysis were used to help on selecting the optimum frac designs. In these trials, other important completion parameters were kept constant: the number of clusters per stage, cluster spacing, type of perforation guns, frac fluid and proppant type. The flowrates are measured using the three phase separators and the corresponding bottom-hole flowing pressures are estimated using multi-phase flow parameters, and the matched wellbore hydraulic models. The reservoir pressure is estimated from the pressure decline analysis of the frac stages along the lateral. The results show that there was almost no change in the productivity results by lowering the proppant volumes 25%. The results also show that better wells are obtained by lowering fluid volumes by 33% and decreasing the additive volumes by more than 75%. Overall, the improved PI obtained with lower proppant and fluid volumes and less additive concentrations, provided an optimized frac design that is being carried into the development phase wells. This paper helps in understanding and maximizing the productivity of the wells and optimizing the design including chemicals, to capitalize the value generation from the individual wells on the multi-well pads.
通过最小化流体、支撑剂和添加剂的体积来最大化产能指数
作为增产计划的一部分,为了在沙特阿拉伯的主要烃源岩区获得最佳滑溜水压裂设计,进行了一系列系统试验,测试了不同的压裂设计参数,如支撑剂的体积和类型,以及流体和添加剂的体积(减摩剂、先锋酸等)。这些试验是在整个油田的几个4口井中精心设计的,比较了同一区块中相邻井的不同设计,以确保油藏和地质条件的一致性,从而得出结论。井的回流时间相对较短,并使用不同的生产分析技术将不同的设计与标准进行比较。本文采用气、气当量、总流体井下流量产能指数(PI)对井的归一化初始产能指数进行了比较,并利用速率瞬态分析得出的有效裂缝长度来帮助选择最佳压裂设计。在这些试验中,其他重要的完井参数保持不变:每级簇数、簇间距、射孔枪类型、压裂液和支撑剂类型。使用三相分离器测量流量,并使用多相流参数和匹配的井筒水力模型估算相应的井底流动压力。通过分析压裂段沿水平段的压降,估算出储层压力。结果表明,将支撑剂体积降低25%后,产能结果几乎没有变化。结果还表明,将流体体积降低33%,将添加剂体积减少75%以上,可以获得更好的井。总的来说,通过更低的支撑剂和流体体积以及更低的添加剂浓度,获得了改进的PI,为开发阶段的井提供了优化的压裂设计。本文有助于理解和最大限度地提高油井的生产率,优化包括化学品在内的设计,以充分利用多井平台上单井的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信