Heuristic evaluation of online satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service: Applying analytical hierarchical process

S. Yusoh, Sureena Matayong
{"title":"Heuristic evaluation of online satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service: Applying analytical hierarchical process","authors":"S. Yusoh, Sureena Matayong","doi":"10.1109/ICITISEE.2017.8285551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to evaluate usability factors of online satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service. The evaluation was performed to analyze issues of usability factors, which is relevant to user interface design by applying Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize their level of challenges. The study focuses on 10 Jakob Nielsen's heuristics principles as main usability factors. Based on main factors, 43 sub-factors are determined. Relevant data was collected through questionnaires by surveying 24 persons, including programmers, system analyst, students, lecturers, and general users. Next, researchers calculated values of data by using Expert Choice. The result shows the first 5 levels of usability factors that are challenges in a form of percentage rate respectively. The factors of recognition rather than recall (81%); help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors (78%); match between system and real world (77%); user control and freedom (76%) and consistency and standards (74%). The challenge rate of all usability factors reveal 72% while non-challenge rate is only 28%. From the result of this study we can conclude that existing online applications of satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service need to be improved. The improvement can be taken by prioritizing the usability factors based on level of challenges that found in this study.","PeriodicalId":130873,"journal":{"name":"2017 2nd International conferences on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 2nd International conferences on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITISEE.2017.8285551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate usability factors of online satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service. The evaluation was performed to analyze issues of usability factors, which is relevant to user interface design by applying Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize their level of challenges. The study focuses on 10 Jakob Nielsen's heuristics principles as main usability factors. Based on main factors, 43 sub-factors are determined. Relevant data was collected through questionnaires by surveying 24 persons, including programmers, system analyst, students, lecturers, and general users. Next, researchers calculated values of data by using Expert Choice. The result shows the first 5 levels of usability factors that are challenges in a form of percentage rate respectively. The factors of recognition rather than recall (81%); help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors (78%); match between system and real world (77%); user control and freedom (76%) and consistency and standards (74%). The challenge rate of all usability factors reveal 72% while non-challenge rate is only 28%. From the result of this study we can conclude that existing online applications of satisfaction survey system for public healthcare service need to be improved. The improvement can be taken by prioritizing the usability factors based on level of challenges that found in this study.
公共卫生服务在线满意度调查系统的启发式评价:应用层次分析法
本文旨在评价公共卫生服务在线满意度调查系统的可用性因素。运用层次分析法(AHP)对与用户界面设计相关的可用性因素进行排序,分析其存在的问题。该研究将10个Jakob Nielsen的启发式原则作为主要的可用性因素。在主因子的基础上,确定了43个子因子。通过对程序员、系统分析员、学生、讲师、普通用户等24人进行问卷调查,收集相关数据。接下来,研究人员使用Expert Choice计算数据值。结果显示,前5个级别的可用性因素分别以百分比的形式构成挑战。记忆因素为识别因素,而非回忆因素(81%);帮助用户识别、诊断错误并从错误中恢复(78%);系统与现实世界的匹配度(77%);用户控制和自由(76%),一致性和标准(74%)。所有可用性因素的挑战率为72%,而非挑战率仅为28%。从本研究的结果可以看出,现有的公共医疗服务满意度调查系统的在线应用需要改进。改进可以通过根据本研究中发现的挑战级别对可用性因素进行优先级排序来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信