Associations of visual functions with attitudes about motor vehicle dashboards among older drivers

Thomas A. Swain, Scott W. Snyder, Jr Gerald McGwin, C. Owsley
{"title":"Associations of visual functions with attitudes about motor vehicle dashboards among older drivers","authors":"Thomas A. Swain, Scott W. Snyder, Jr Gerald McGwin, C. Owsley","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2022.918781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Proper understanding and interaction with the dashboard is an essential aspect of safely operating a motor vehicle. A portion of this task is dependent on vision, yet no published information exists regarding dashboard ergonomics and visual function. This study sought to associate visual functions and person abilities of dashboard ergonomic dimensions relevant to older driver design preferences and attitudes. Methods In this population-based study of drivers, participants completed functional testing for habitual distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field sensitivity, visual processing speed, and spatial ability. A questionnaire assessed attitudes and understanding of dashboard design, with questionnaire items generated from the content of focus groups of older drivers. Dashboard design domains identified in Rasch analysis of questionnaire responses were quantified using person ability measures for the cognitive processing, lighting, obstructions, and pattern recognition domains. Visual functions and person abilities were correlated using Spearman partial correlations, adjusting for age and sex. Results A total of 997 participants completed functional testing and the dashboard questionnaire. The mean age was 77.4 ± 4.6 years, and the majority were male (55%) and white (81%). The sample had a range of person abilities and visual functions. Contrast and visual field sensitivities were significantly associated with the cognitive processing, lighting, and pattern recognition dashboard design dimensions (p ≤ 0.0052). For all significant associations, increased visual function was indicative of better person ability. Visual processing speed, as measured by Trails B and UFOV2, was significantly associated with the lighting domain (p = 0.0008 and p = 0.0007, respectively). The UFOV2 measure was correlated with pattern recognition (p = 0.0165). Spatial ability was the only visual function associated with the visual obstruction dimension (p = 0.0347). Conclusions Person ability for dashboard design domains are related to visual function in older drivers. Results show person ability for domains increased with improved visual function. Future automotive engineering and design initiatives should consider these associations in improving dashboard designs to increase vehicle utility and accessibility.","PeriodicalId":207447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2022.918781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Proper understanding and interaction with the dashboard is an essential aspect of safely operating a motor vehicle. A portion of this task is dependent on vision, yet no published information exists regarding dashboard ergonomics and visual function. This study sought to associate visual functions and person abilities of dashboard ergonomic dimensions relevant to older driver design preferences and attitudes. Methods In this population-based study of drivers, participants completed functional testing for habitual distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field sensitivity, visual processing speed, and spatial ability. A questionnaire assessed attitudes and understanding of dashboard design, with questionnaire items generated from the content of focus groups of older drivers. Dashboard design domains identified in Rasch analysis of questionnaire responses were quantified using person ability measures for the cognitive processing, lighting, obstructions, and pattern recognition domains. Visual functions and person abilities were correlated using Spearman partial correlations, adjusting for age and sex. Results A total of 997 participants completed functional testing and the dashboard questionnaire. The mean age was 77.4 ± 4.6 years, and the majority were male (55%) and white (81%). The sample had a range of person abilities and visual functions. Contrast and visual field sensitivities were significantly associated with the cognitive processing, lighting, and pattern recognition dashboard design dimensions (p ≤ 0.0052). For all significant associations, increased visual function was indicative of better person ability. Visual processing speed, as measured by Trails B and UFOV2, was significantly associated with the lighting domain (p = 0.0008 and p = 0.0007, respectively). The UFOV2 measure was correlated with pattern recognition (p = 0.0165). Spatial ability was the only visual function associated with the visual obstruction dimension (p = 0.0347). Conclusions Person ability for dashboard design domains are related to visual function in older drivers. Results show person ability for domains increased with improved visual function. Future automotive engineering and design initiatives should consider these associations in improving dashboard designs to increase vehicle utility and accessibility.
老年驾驶员对汽车仪表板态度与视觉功能的关系
正确理解和与仪表盘的互动是安全操作机动车辆的重要方面。这项任务的一部分依赖于视觉,但没有关于仪表板人体工程学和视觉功能的公开信息。本研究试图将视觉功能和仪表盘人机工程学维度与老年驾驶员的设计偏好和态度联系起来。方法在这项以人群为基础的研究中,参与者完成了习惯距离视力、对比灵敏度、视野灵敏度、视觉处理速度和空间能力的功能测试。一份问卷评估了对仪表盘设计的态度和理解,问卷项目来自老年司机焦点小组的内容。在Rasch对问卷回答的分析中确定的仪表盘设计领域,使用认知处理、照明、障碍物和模式识别领域的个人能力测量来量化。视觉功能和人的能力使用斯皮尔曼部分相关,调整了年龄和性别。结果共有997名参与者完成了功能测试和仪表板问卷。平均年龄77.4±4.6岁,以男性(55%)和白人(81%)居多。这些样本具有一系列的人的能力和视觉功能。对比度和视野敏感度与认知加工、照明和模式识别仪表板设计维度显著相关(p≤0.0052)。在所有显著的关联中,视觉功能的增强表明人的能力更好。由Trails B和UFOV2测量的视觉处理速度与光照域显著相关(p = 0.0008和p = 0.0007分别)。UFOV2测量与模式识别相关(p = 0.0165)。空间能力是唯一与视觉障碍尺寸相关的视觉功能(p = 0.0347)。结论老年驾驶员仪表盘设计领域的人的能力与视觉功能有关。结果表明,人的领域能力随着视觉功能的改善而提高。未来的汽车工程和设计计划应该考虑这些联系,以改进仪表盘设计,增加车辆的实用性和可达性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信