Complications after duodenopancreatectomy within eras protocols in a developing country

Juan Pablo Aristizábal Linares, Jose Julian Estrada Quiroz, Diego Fernando Davila Martinez, Carolina Hoyos Gomez, Ó. Palacios, P. Zapata
{"title":"Complications after duodenopancreatectomy within eras protocols in a developing country","authors":"Juan Pablo Aristizábal Linares, Jose Julian Estrada Quiroz, Diego Fernando Davila Martinez, Carolina Hoyos Gomez, Ó. Palacios, P. Zapata","doi":"10.15406/jaccoa.2019.11.00413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent studies have suggested that intraoperative fluid overload is associated with the presence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after duodenopancreatectomy. Finding the ideal balance between hypoperfusion and tissue edema with fluids administration during major gastrointestinal surgery is challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative fluid management along with enhanced recovery protocols could affect the outcome after a major pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from 67 consecutive patients who underwent duodenopancreatectomy from January 2012 to January 2017 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Patients in ERAS protocols had a fluid therapy algorithm which consists: Systolic Volume Variation (SVV) less than 13%, Cardiac Index (CI) higher than 2.5 L/Min/M2 and Delta CO2 less than 6 mmHg. Results: A total of 67 patients were analyzed from July 2012 to January 2017, of these 49.3 % correspond to the female gender. The most frequent diagnosis was Pancreatic Cancer n:48 (71.6%), followed by Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) n:6 (9%). The majority of patients were in the ERAS Group with a total of 46 patients (68.7%). In the ERAS group, 80.4% and 95.7% did not develop POPF and Delayed Gastric Emptying (DGE) respectively. The incidence of POFP in all the patients was 11.94% (Grade A are considered biochemical leak and NOT a proper fistula). The incidence of DGE was 11.94%. The probability of intraoperative blood loss less than 300ml was higher in the ERAS group; however, the probability to need a transfusion was lower in the ERAS Group. The probability to use less than 5000ml of fluid therapy was higher in the ERAS group. The total length of stay was statistically significant shorter in the ERAS group. No differences in 30-days mortality were found. Conclusion: The implementation of ERAS protocols in PD did show a decrease in intraoperative blood loss, intravenous fluids therapy, need for transfusion, DGE, and total hospital stay; however, intraoperative fluid restriction in PD did not show to significantly affect POPF.","PeriodicalId":228896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2019.11.00413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have suggested that intraoperative fluid overload is associated with the presence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after duodenopancreatectomy. Finding the ideal balance between hypoperfusion and tissue edema with fluids administration during major gastrointestinal surgery is challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative fluid management along with enhanced recovery protocols could affect the outcome after a major pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from 67 consecutive patients who underwent duodenopancreatectomy from January 2012 to January 2017 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Patients in ERAS protocols had a fluid therapy algorithm which consists: Systolic Volume Variation (SVV) less than 13%, Cardiac Index (CI) higher than 2.5 L/Min/M2 and Delta CO2 less than 6 mmHg. Results: A total of 67 patients were analyzed from July 2012 to January 2017, of these 49.3 % correspond to the female gender. The most frequent diagnosis was Pancreatic Cancer n:48 (71.6%), followed by Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) n:6 (9%). The majority of patients were in the ERAS Group with a total of 46 patients (68.7%). In the ERAS group, 80.4% and 95.7% did not develop POPF and Delayed Gastric Emptying (DGE) respectively. The incidence of POFP in all the patients was 11.94% (Grade A are considered biochemical leak and NOT a proper fistula). The incidence of DGE was 11.94%. The probability of intraoperative blood loss less than 300ml was higher in the ERAS group; however, the probability to need a transfusion was lower in the ERAS Group. The probability to use less than 5000ml of fluid therapy was higher in the ERAS group. The total length of stay was statistically significant shorter in the ERAS group. No differences in 30-days mortality were found. Conclusion: The implementation of ERAS protocols in PD did show a decrease in intraoperative blood loss, intravenous fluids therapy, need for transfusion, DGE, and total hospital stay; however, intraoperative fluid restriction in PD did not show to significantly affect POPF.
发展中国家十二指肠胰切除术后的并发症
背景:最近的研究表明,术中液体超载与十二指肠胰切除术后胰瘘的存在有关。在大胃肠手术中,在灌注不足和组织水肿之间寻找理想的平衡是具有挑战性的。本研究的目的是评估术中液体处理和增强恢复方案是否会影响胰腺大切除术后的预后。方法:对2012年1月至2017年1月连续67例十二指肠胰切除术患者的数据进行分析。根据术后增强恢复方案的使用将患者分为两组。ERAS方案患者的液体治疗算法包括:收缩期容积变化(SVV)小于13%,心脏指数(CI)高于2.5 L/Min/M2, δ CO2小于6 mmHg。结果:2012年7月至2017年1月共分析67例患者,其中女性占49.3%。最常见的诊断是胰腺癌n:48(71.6%),其次是导管内乳头状粘液瘤(IPMN) n:6(9%)。ERAS组患者居多,共46例(68.7%)。在ERAS组中,80.4%和95.7%的患者分别未发生POPF和胃排空延迟(DGE)。所有患者的POFP发生率为11.94% (A级为生化泄漏,非适当瘘管)。DGE的发生率为11.94%。ERAS组术中出血量小于300ml的概率较高;然而,ERAS组需要输血的可能性较低。ERAS组使用少于5000ml液体治疗的概率更高。ERAS组总住院时间显著缩短。30天死亡率无差异。结论:在PD中实施ERAS方案确实显示术中出血量、静脉输液治疗、输血需求、DGE和总住院时间的减少;然而,PD术中限制液体并没有显示出对POPF的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信