Coordinating Product Market Strategies Using Market Feedback

Xingjia Zhang
{"title":"Coordinating Product Market Strategies Using Market Feedback","authors":"Xingjia Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3919986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a model where firms learn from stock price movements about their product market competitors. The firm uses market feedback to adjust its best responses to its rivals' strategies, and these adjustments help to increase profits. We find consumers are worse off. To understand the role of information, we consider two scenarios: first, a public-private, and second, a public-public combination. We find firms are better off and consumers are worse off in the second relative to the first scenario. The informed investor earns less in the second scenario implying that, in equilibrium, she picks one stock to trade. We find market feedback is socially valuable. Our results have important normative implications: we highlight the partial irrelevance of direct regulatory efforts and the role of corporate taxes in mitigating consumers' resentments in a free-market economy.","PeriodicalId":260048,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We develop a model where firms learn from stock price movements about their product market competitors. The firm uses market feedback to adjust its best responses to its rivals' strategies, and these adjustments help to increase profits. We find consumers are worse off. To understand the role of information, we consider two scenarios: first, a public-private, and second, a public-public combination. We find firms are better off and consumers are worse off in the second relative to the first scenario. The informed investor earns less in the second scenario implying that, in equilibrium, she picks one stock to trade. We find market feedback is socially valuable. Our results have important normative implications: we highlight the partial irrelevance of direct regulatory efforts and the role of corporate taxes in mitigating consumers' resentments in a free-market economy.
利用市场反馈协调产品市场策略
我们开发了一个模型,在这个模型中,公司可以从其产品市场竞争对手的股价变动中学习。公司利用市场反馈来调整其对竞争对手策略的最佳反应,这些调整有助于增加利润。我们发现消费者的情况更糟。为了理解信息的作用,我们考虑两种情况:第一种是公共-私人,第二种是公共-公共组合。我们发现,相对于第一种情况,第二种情况下企业的境况更好,消费者的境况更差。在第二种情况下,知情的投资者赚得较少,这意味着,在均衡情况下,她会选择一只股票进行交易。我们发现市场反馈具有社会价值。我们的研究结果具有重要的规范意义:我们强调了在自由市场经济中,直接监管努力和公司税在减轻消费者不满方面的作用之间的部分不相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信